| |
Main
Date: 27 Aug 2007 03:09:02
From: Sanny
Subject: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
Last time An error was corrected but that brought new errors. I feel
now all errors have been removed.
You can restart your game and complete them Quickly.
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
I played and saw the game is playing very fast and very strong moves.
So Sorry for troubles, Now you can have pleasent games at GetClub
Chess.
Still if any errors are found they will be removed immidietly.
Let me know your Experiences with new GetClub Game.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
| |
Date: 29 Aug 2007 22:23:13
From: Dave (from the UK)
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
Sanny wrote:
> I played and saw the game is playing very fast and very strong moves.
Given you admit you are a weak player, how would you know what is a very
strong move?
--
Dave (from the UK)
Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form: [email protected]
Hitting reply will work for a few months only - later set it manually.
http://chessdb.sourceforge.net/ - a Free open-source Chess Database
|
| |
Date: 28 Aug 2007 22:16:42
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
On Aug 29, 9:27 am, help bot <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Aug 28, 1:25 am, Sanny <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > What do you think of Rybka's chances if it gave Sanny's program a queen
> > > > odds? Do you think Rybka could manage a draw, or do you think Sanny's
> > > > program might actually be able to win if Rybka started a queen down?
>
> > > I think in the case of Rybka offering Queen odds, the
> > > game would perhaps go as far as three or four moves
> > > before one of the two programs would freeze up, making
> > > the result unclear since Sanny's would perhaps still
> > > retain a small material advantage. :>D
>
> > > -- help bot
>
> > Have you play a game recently?
>
> As a matter of fact, I have played several games
> lately. However, there is one site where I have not
> been able to complete even a single game of late:
> GetClub.com. It's buggy.
>
> Right now, I am in the midst of a pleasant winning
> streak, where even in those games where I unwisely
> tried the Latvian Gambit and Faulkbeer Countergambit
> (section B343, Kortchnoi and Zak "King's Gambit"),
> I was lucky enough to survive "book" yet obviously
> losing, positions. Part of this must be credited to my
> opponents, which include Rob Mitchell among others;
> bit part is a credit to my own *vast* experience with
> defending losing positions. You could say that I am
> one of the world's foremost authorities on winning
> losing positions, I guess; my opponents like to call
> it luck, but it is so persistent at times as to all but
> dissolve the boundaries between luck and skill, IMO.
>
> -- help bot
I feel now thegame is alright, Yesterday Bonsai, Myself and Landon6544
played game. I found most moves were played in 10-20 Seconds.
I agree last 2 days the game was not playing correctly. Butnow it is
playing very strong and quite fast.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.getclub.com/Chess.html
|
| |
Date: 28 Aug 2007 21:27:23
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
On Aug 28, 1:25 am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote:
> > > What do you think of Rybka's chances if it gave Sanny's program a queen
> > > odds? Do you think Rybka could manage a draw, or do you think Sanny's
> > > program might actually be able to win if Rybka started a queen down?
>
> > I think in the case of Rybka offering Queen odds, the
> > game would perhaps go as far as three or four moves
> > before one of the two programs would freeze up, making
> > the result unclear since Sanny's would perhaps still
> > retain a small material advantage. :>D
>
> > -- help bot
>
> Have you play a game recently?
As a matter of fact, I have played several games
lately. However, there is one site where I have not
been able to complete even a single game of late:
GetClub.com. It's buggy.
Right now, I am in the midst of a pleasant winning
streak, where even in those games where I unwisely
tried the Latvian Gambit and Faulkbeer Countergambit
(section B343, Kortchnoi and Zak "King's Gambit"),
I was lucky enough to survive "book" yet obviously
losing, positions. Part of this must be credited to my
opponents, which include Rob Mitchell among others;
bit part is a credit to my own *vast* experience with
defending losing positions. You could say that I am
one of the world's foremost authorities on winning
losing positions, I guess; my opponents like to call
it luck, but it is so persistent at times as to all but
dissolve the boundaries between luck and skill, IMO.
-- help bot
|
| |
Date: 27 Aug 2007 23:25:26
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
On Aug 28, 4:40 am, help bot <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Aug 27, 5:17 pm, "Dave (from the UK)" <see-my-signat...@see-
>
> below.com> wrote:
> > help bot wrote:
> > > A Rook-odds match against Rybka is in
> > > the cards, as I see it.
>
> > > -- amazed bot
>
> > What do you think of Rybka's chances if it gave Sanny's program a queen
> > odds? Do you think Rybka could manage a draw, or do you think Sanny's
> > program might actually be able to win if Rybka started a queen down?
>
> I think in the case of Rybka offering Queen odds, the
> game would perhaps go as far as three or four moves
> before one of the two programs would freeze up, making
> the result unclear since Sanny's would perhaps still
> retain a small material advantage. :>D
>
> -- help bot
Have you play a game recently?
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| |
Date: 27 Aug 2007 16:40:35
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
On Aug 27, 5:17 pm, "Dave (from the UK)" <see-my-signat...@see-
below.com > wrote:
> help bot wrote:
> > A Rook-odds match against Rybka is in
> > the cards, as I see it.
>
> > -- amazed bot
>
> What do you think of Rybka's chances if it gave Sanny's program a queen
> odds? Do you think Rybka could manage a draw, or do you think Sanny's
> program might actually be able to win if Rybka started a queen down?
I think in the case of Rybka offering Queen odds, the
game would perhaps go as far as three or four moves
before one of the two programs would freeze up, making
the result unclear since Sanny's would perhaps still
retain a small material advantage. : >D
-- help bot
|
| |
Date: 27 Aug 2007 13:32:56
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
On Aug 27, 8:15 am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote:
> Here is the revised rating as per the game GetClub is playing Now.
>
> Beginner: 1600
> Easy: 1700
> Notmal: 1800
> Master: 1900
> Advance: 2000.
>
> I have added +200 Rating to the game play. As by various improvements
> made in last 5 days the Games play rating has improved by +200. from
> 1400-> 1600. (Beginner Level.)
Wow! By making it neigh well impossible for the
likes of me, Taylor Kingston, or nearly-an-IM Innes
to play, Sanny has blown past us all and is now
hundreds of points stronger than everyone else on
the site. Incredible. What amazing improvements.
The program must now be so improved as to strike
fear in the hearts of all mortal men, including Bobby
Fischer. A Rook-odds match against Rybka is in
the cards, as I see it.
-- amazed bot
|
| | |
Date: 27 Aug 2007 23:17:13
From: Dave (from the UK)
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
help bot wrote:
> A Rook-odds match against Rybka is in
> the cards, as I see it.
>
>
> -- amazed bot
>
What do you think of Rybka's chances if it gave Sanny's program a queen
odds? Do you think Rybka could manage a draw, or do you think Sanny's
program might actually be able to win if Rybka started a queen down?
--
Dave (from the UK)
Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form: [email protected]
Hitting reply will work for a few months only - later set it manually.
http://chessdb.sourceforge.net/ - a Free open-source Chess Database
|
| |
Date: 27 Aug 2007 06:15:53
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Game Corrected (2 more errors removed.)
|
> Let me know your Experiences with new GetClub Game.
>
> Bye
> Sanny
>
> Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
Here is the revised rating as per the game GetClub is playing Now.
Beginner: 1600
Easy: 1700
Notmal: 1800
Master: 1900
Advance: 2000.
I have added +200 Rating to the game play. As by various improvements
made in last 5 days the Games play rating has improved by +200. from
1400- > 1600. (Beginner Level.)
Bye
Sanny
So, If you have a rating below 2000 you will find a tough challenge at
GetClub Chess.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
