| |
Main
Date: 06 Apr 2005 00:39:54
From: Sanny
Subject: My recent game with Computer Can you do it's analysis.
|
Below is the Game I played with the Computer Online. Can I know my
rating by the moves I & the computer made.
http://www.softtanks.com/chessgame/Chess.html
The Game is as Below.
(White) (Black)
(Myself) (Computer)
1. P-e4 P-d6
2. P-d3 N-c6
3. N-f3 Q-d7
4. B-e3 N-e5
5. N*e5 P*e5
6. N-c3 Q-d8
7. B-e2 P-g6
8. o-o P-b6
9. P-d4 P*d4
10. B*d4 N-f6
11. B*f6 P*f6
12. Q*d8 K*d8
13. f1-d1 B-d6
14. N-d5 B-b7
15. B-c4 K-e8
Later I was able to trap the Bishop using my Rook. The game was Played
with Normal Level of the Computer at
http://www.softtanks.com/chessgame/Chess.html
Can anyone suggest the Ranking of the game by seeing the moves?
Bye
Sanjay.
|
|
| |
Date: 07 Apr 2005 19:39:15
From: Ron
Subject: Re: My recent game with Computer Can you do it's analysis.
|
In article <[email protected] >,
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote:
> Can anyone suggest the Ranking of the game by seeing the moves?
With any precision? No. But both players are clearly not very skilled
at all. Black neglects his development and shuffles his pieces around.
White plays with unneccesary passivity without any sort of plan, and
misses a fairly straightforward chance to play for the advantage.
I doubt either player would break 1000, but that's little more than a
wild-ass guess.
|
| |
Date: 06 Apr 2005 23:57:10
From: Bark!
Subject: Re: My recent game with Computer Can you do it's analysis.
|
Na njuzima:[email protected],
Sanny <[email protected] > mukotrpnim radom iznade ovu umotvorinu:
> Below is the Game I played with the Computer Online. Can I know my
> rating by the moves I & the computer made.
>
> http://www.softtanks.com/chessgame/Chess.html
>
>
> The Game is as Below.
> (White) (Black)
> (Myself) (Computer)
>
> 1. P-e4 P-d6
> 2. P-d3 N-c6
> 3. N-f3 Q-d7
> 4. B-e3 N-e5
> 5. N*e5 P*e5
> 6. N-c3 Q-d8
> 7. B-e2 P-g6
> 8. o-o P-b6
> 9. P-d4 P*d4
> 10. B*d4 N-f6
> 11. B*f6 P*f6
> 12. Q*d8 K*d8
> 13. f1-d1 B-d6
> 14. N-d5 B-b7
> 15. B-c4 K-e8
>
> Later I was able to trap the Bishop using my Rook. The game was Played
> with Normal Level of the Computer at
>
> http://www.softtanks.com/chessgame/Chess.html
>
> Can anyone suggest the Ranking of the game by seeing the moves?
>
> Bye
> Sanjay.
Check my post 4.4.2005. Rating from moves?? below.
|
| |
Date: 06 Apr 2005 13:35:40
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus-J=FCrgen_Heigl?=
Subject: Re: My recent game with Computer Can you do it's analysis.
|
Sanny wrote:
> Later I was able to trap the Bishop using my Rook. The game was Played
> with Normal Level of the Computer at
> Can anyone suggest the Ranking of the game by seeing the moves?
I'd say Black played like having no clue, shuffling his pieces back and
forth with no sense and largely ignoring development. White I would rate
at the beginner level or intermediate, following standard advice to
develop his pieces quickly but he didn't deploy them on the most
effective squares. White was keen to avoid blunders but this led him to
play passively. Also White didn't have an effective plan to exploit
Black's play.
> 1. P-e4 P-d6
> 2. P-d3 N-c6
> 3. N-f3 Q-d7
> 4. B-e3 N-e5
> 5. N*e5 P*e5
> 6. N-c3 Q-d8
> 7. B-e2 P-g6
> 8. o-o P-b6
> 9. P-d4 P*d4
> 10. B*d4 N-f6
> 11. B*f6 P*f6
> 12. Q*d8 K*d8
> 13. f1-d1 B-d6
> 14. N-d5 B-b7
> 15. B-c4 K-e8
For example 2. d3 was passive, d4 instead doesn't restrict the Bf1 in
its movement and takes better control of the center. 4. Be3 is an ok
move, but the bishop may be more effective elsewhere, so I would have
developed another piece instead, like Nc3 or Be2. 5. Nxe5 loses time. If
you wanted to trade the knights you could have played d4 dislodging the
black knight from the center. If Black trades, Black had moved his
knight three times to trade it against a piece that has moved only once,
where by capturing Nxe5 both knights have moved twice. 11. Bxf6 gives
away most of the decisive advantage White already had. 11. e5 c5
(11...Nd7 12. e6 Nf6 13. Bb5+ loses material big time) 12. exf6 cxd4 13.
Bb5+ Bd7 14. fxe7 Bxe7 15. Qxd4 gives White an overwhelming attack.
Claus-Juergen
|
|
