| |
Main
Date: 31 Dec 2006 18:22:49
From: samsloan
Subject: I need dirt!
|
I'm fighting for my political life right now. If Polgar is elected, I'm
fucked. She'll probably ban me for life. I need your help. I need to
get rid of Goichberg, Channing and Hough fast. I need dirt on them. I
want to destroy CCA too. Leroy Dubeck and Beatriz inello fully
support me on this issue. And don't forget to vote for me for another 4
years.
Sam Sloan
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Jan 2007 06:23:56
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: I need dirt!
|
Why does Bill defend Polgar? Bill needs to go!
Sam Sloan
samsloan wrote:
> chessoffice wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
> I find the story on the Frank Niro posting about the lengths that Paul
> Truong and Susan Polgar went to get the computer Frank Niro had been
> using from the USCF office after Niro has disappeared due to a claimed
> "heart attack" to be interesting. That computer no doubt contained
> correspondence between Niro and Truong and Polgar which would have
> provided incriminating evidence.
>
>
> How can you say it "no doubt" would have provided incriminating
> evidence? What proof do you have? So far you have been unable to
> present any evidence to back up your various attacks on Polgar.
>
> Quote:
> This very likely explains why they would go to such lengths to get it
> away from the USCF. This was also theft. The computer belonged to the
> USCF, not to Frank Niro.
>
> Sam Sloan
>
>
> Sam, do you read your own posts? You just quoted Niro as saying:
>
> "Not only did Susan and Paul approach the Board of Directors on my
> behalf, they offered to pay for it!"
>
> Does this sound like theft, or does it sound like the Board was
> approached with an offer to buy Niro's computer? Sure seems like the
> latter to me. If you offer to buy something and its owner accepts the
> offer, is that theft?
>
> Bill Goichberg
>
> I continue to be astounded by the lengths to which Bill Goichberg will
> go to defend the obviously improper activities of his political allies,
> Susan Polgar and Paul Truong.
>
> The laptop computer in question obviously belonged to the USCF, not to
> Frank Niro. That is why Niro writes that Polgar and Truong ofered to
> pay the USCF for it.
>
>
> Yes, it clearly belonged to USCF. Just as clearly, there is zero
> evidence that it was stolen from USCF. You should retract that
> outrageous charge immediately.
>
> Quote:
> I assume that this incident occurred in the few days immediately after
> Frank Niro disappeared and nobody knew where he was. Beatriz inello
> was elected USCF President on August 11, 2003 in Los Angeles. On August
> 20, 2003, Beatriz walked into the USCF Offices in New Windsor NY and
> immediately fired 17 staff members. I was severely critical of her at
> that time, but I did not know then a fact that I know now that I am on
> the board, which is that the USCF was overdrawn at the bank by
> $121,641.25. (This figure is found on page 37 of the CD that was
> prepared after I got on the board and demanding an accounting of the
> funds.)
>
>
> It was worse than that, USCF also owed about $400,000 to creditors. But
> how does this justify your alleging that a computer was stolen, when
> there is no proof of this?
>
> Quote:
> I have a recollection of the incident involving the computer because at
> that time Paul Truong was often calling me and informing me of the
> latest goings on. (We were allies at that time, or at least I thought
> that we were.)
>
> What needs to be done now and what I call upon Bill Goichberg to do is
> find out who has the computer now and take steps to get it back. The
> data on that computer clearly belongs to the USCF and would be helpful
> in finding out what happened to the two million dollars the USCF lost,
> most of which was lost when Frank Niro and his immediate predecessor
> George DeFeis were Executive Director.
>
>
> I would assume that USCF sold the computer to Niro and that he either
> still owns it, or it has since been junked and important data copied to
> another computer. In either case, we would have no grounds for trying
> to compel Niro to return the computer or the data.
>
> It seems very unlikely that the computer has data valuable to USCF. If
> it does, we can't force Niro to turn it over to us.
>
> Quote:
> We also need to know who on the board was "approached" (especially
> since the board was fractured at that point in time. Was this before or
> after McCrary and Caatta resigned?), and who authorized Paul Truong
> and Susan Polgar to take that computer from the USCF's office, or did
> they just steal it.
>
> Sam Sloan
>
>
> You say above of the transfer of the computer, "This was also theft."
> It's outrageous to say this as you have no evidence, but now you have
> added, "did they just steal it."
>
> Charging people with illegal activity with no evidence is despicible.
> These are smear attacks, using an old technique- say it enough times
> and some people will believe it.
>
> You talk about USCF losing money, about your former dealings with
> Truong, and about how important recovery of this computer would be to
> USCF. None of this backs up your charges of theft or hiding
> incriminating data.
>
> Obviously you have no evidence to support your claims, or we would have
> heard it by now. You should retract and apoloigize for your charges.
>
> Bill Goichberg
>
> Back to top
>
>
> JGoins 13492105
>
>
>
> Joined: 27 Dec 2006
> Posts: 1
> Location: Tennessee
> Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 8:29 am Post subject:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Mr. Sloan,
>
> You've been asked repeatedly to discuss some serious topics and answer
> to/defend yourself from some serious allegations. Instead of doing this
> it seems you're simply bouncing ideas for a trashy spy novel off the
> members of this forum.
>
> I can see it now - - Ms. Polgar and Mr. Truong (or their actor
> stand-ins) in black catsuits, sneaking through USCF headquarters some
> moonless night, evading guard dogs, weaving through laser beam alarm
> systems, hacking into the mainframe to delete incriminating evidence
> then deposit a super-killer virus just for spite.
>
> Are you, Mr. Sloan, a convicted felon? Did you lie about your
> qualifications during the last election? Were you ever a Master - did
> you ever claim to be? Did you solicit under-age girls for sex?
>
> Please, Mr. Sloan, before I bring my young nephews into the USCF,
> debunk some of these serious allegations or lose my vote.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> JGoins
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 18:31:12
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: I need dirt!
|
chessoffice wrote:
samsloan wrote:
I find the story on the Frank Niro posting about the lengths that Paul
Truong and Susan Polgar went to get the computer Frank Niro had been
using from the USCF office after Niro has disappeared due to a claimed
"heart attack" to be interesting. That computer no doubt contained
correspondence between Niro and Truong and Polgar which would have
provided incriminating evidence.
How can you say it "no doubt" would have provided incriminating
evidence? What proof do you have? So far you have been unable to
present any evidence to back up your various attacks on Polgar.
Quote:
This very likely explains why they would go to such lengths to get it
away from the USCF. This was also theft. The computer belonged to the
USCF, not to Frank Niro.
Sam Sloan
Sam, do you read your own posts? You just quoted Niro as saying:
"Not only did Susan and Paul approach the Board of Directors on my
behalf, they offered to pay for it!"
Does this sound like theft, or does it sound like the Board was
approached with an offer to buy Niro's computer? Sure seems like the
latter to me. If you offer to buy something and its owner accepts the
offer, is that theft?
Bill Goichberg
I continue to be astounded by the lengths to which Bill Goichberg will
go to defend the obviously improper activities of his political allies,
Susan Polgar and Paul Truong.
The laptop computer in question obviously belonged to the USCF, not to
Frank Niro. That is why Niro writes that Polgar and Truong ofered to
pay the USCF for it.
Yes, it clearly belonged to USCF. Just as clearly, there is zero
evidence that it was stolen from USCF. You should retract that
outrageous charge immediately.
Quote:
I assume that this incident occurred in the few days immediately after
Frank Niro disappeared and nobody knew where he was. Beatriz inello
was elected USCF President on August 11, 2003 in Los Angeles. On August
20, 2003, Beatriz walked into the USCF Offices in New Windsor NY and
immediately fired 17 staff members. I was severely critical of her at
that time, but I did not know then a fact that I know now that I am on
the board, which is that the USCF was overdrawn at the bank by
$121,641.25. (This figure is found on page 37 of the CD that was
prepared after I got on the board and demanding an accounting of the
funds.)
It was worse than that, USCF also owed about $400,000 to creditors. But
how does this justify your alleging that a computer was stolen, when
there is no proof of this?
Quote:
I have a recollection of the incident involving the computer because at
that time Paul Truong was often calling me and informing me of the
latest goings on. (We were allies at that time, or at least I thought
that we were.)
What needs to be done now and what I call upon Bill Goichberg to do is
find out who has the computer now and take steps to get it back. The
data on that computer clearly belongs to the USCF and would be helpful
in finding out what happened to the two million dollars the USCF lost,
most of which was lost when Frank Niro and his immediate predecessor
George DeFeis were Executive Director.
I would assume that USCF sold the computer to Niro and that he either
still owns it, or it has since been junked and important data copied to
another computer. In either case, we would have no grounds for trying
to compel Niro to return the computer or the data.
It seems very unlikely that the computer has data valuable to USCF. If
it does, we can't force Niro to turn it over to us.
Quote:
We also need to know who on the board was "approached" (especially
since the board was fractured at that point in time. Was this before or
after McCrary and Caatta resigned?), and who authorized Paul Truong
and Susan Polgar to take that computer from the USCF's office, or did
they just steal it.
Sam Sloan
You say above of the transfer of the computer, "This was also theft."
It's outrageous to say this as you have no evidence, but now you have
added, "did they just steal it."
Charging people with illegal activity with no evidence is despicible.
These are smear attacks, using an old technique- say it enough times
and some people will believe it.
You talk about USCF losing money, about your former dealings with
Truong, and about how important recovery of this computer would be to
USCF. None of this backs up your charges of theft or hiding
incriminating data.
Obviously you have no evidence to support your claims, or we would have
heard it by now. You should retract and apoloigize for your charges.
Bill Goichberg
Back to top
JGoins 13492105
Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 1
Location: Tennessee
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 8:29 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Sloan,
You've been asked repeatedly to discuss some serious topics and answer
to/defend yourself from some serious allegations. Instead of doing this
it seems you're simply bouncing ideas for a trashy spy novel off the
members of this forum.
I can see it now - - Ms. Polgar and Mr. Truong (or their actor
stand-ins) in black catsuits, sneaking through USCF headquarters some
moonless night, evading guard dogs, weaving through laser beam alarm
systems, hacking into the mainframe to delete incriminating evidence
then deposit a super-killer virus just for spite.
Are you, Mr. Sloan, a convicted felon? Did you lie about your
qualifications during the last election? Were you ever a Master - did
you ever claim to be? Did you solicit under-age girls for sex?
Please, Mr. Sloan, before I bring my young nephews into the USCF,
debunk some of these serious allegations or lose my vote.
Sincerely,
JGoins
|
|
