| |
Main
Date: 02 Apr 2007 03:40:14
From: samsloan
Subject: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
Since all sides have referred to it and the members have the right and
the need to know, I feel that the Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
should no longer remain secret and therefore I have just posted it.
It is at
http://www.ishipress.com/polgar-opening-secrets.pdf
http://www.samsloan.com/polgar-opening-secrets.pdf
Please note that the file is more than one megabyte and it is a slow
download.
The "agreement" consists of nothing more than a letter dated September
9, 2002 from Frank Niro to Susan Polgar and her reply dated September
19, 2002.
That is all there is. There is nothing more.
There was no follow-up. There was no formal signed agreement. There
was just these two letters.
I do not believe that any judge of any court would uphold this
agreement by REQUIRING the USCF to publish the Polgar column. Polgar
through Truong has repeatedly threatened to sue the USCF if it did not
publish her column.
There were tremendous objections to this agreement at the time that it
was made. Among the objections was that Polgar who had never
previously written a column, was being paid more than any of the
regular columnists. Also, none of the regular columnists had
contracts.
Because of this, the board passed a motion that in the future the
Executive Director may not make agreements like this one without board
approval.
Polgar stopped writing "Opening Secrets" more than one year ago. As a
result, I feel that any rights she may have still had under this
agreement have been extinguished.
Sam Sloan
|
|
| |
Date: 03 Apr 2007 07:18:13
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivot
Subject: Sam Sloan for President
|
On 2 Apr, 16:30, "[email protected]"
<[email protected] > wrote:
> On Apr 2, 4:01 pm, "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > [quote="chrisfalter"][quote="SamSloan"]
> > To everyone's surprise, the Executive Director reported back a few
> > days later that Polgar had agreed to this. [/quote]
>
> > I have never seen Polgar act with less than 100% integrity in her
> > financial affairs, so I am not surprised at all.[/quote]
>
> > I have known Miss Polgar for 22 years.
>
> > You have known her for what, three months? If indeed you know her at
> > all.
>
> > Who do you think knows her better?
>
> > Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell Me, if
> > you have understanding.
>
> > Who determined its measurements? Surely you know! Or who stretched the
> > line upon it?
>
> > To what were its foundations fastened? Or who laid its cornerstone?
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> Sam thrashing again with the usual 'I assume...' without **facts** and
> 'There is no paper trail...' but that won't stop me, nosirreee. I will
> fabricate, insinuate, and slander as much as I can and put forth
> baseless Sam-fantasies regarding Susan Polgar for the express purpose
> of destroying her reputation, the continuation of the political
> hacking I am so famous for, and the propogation of half-truths nobody
> can verify and are impossible to confirm.
>
> But hey, it's what Sam does best. Yep, you're the guy I want on the
> E.B. .... NOT.
>
> Total Hack you are.
>
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Sam Sloan is the most qualified individual.
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2007 13:30:15
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
On Apr 2, 4:01 pm, "samsloan" <[email protected] > wrote:
> [quote="chrisfalter"][quote="SamSloan"]
> To everyone's surprise, the Executive Director reported back a few
> days later that Polgar had agreed to this. [/quote]
>
> I have never seen Polgar act with less than 100% integrity in her
> financial affairs, so I am not surprised at all.[/quote]
>
> I have known Miss Polgar for 22 years.
>
> You have known her for what, three months? If indeed you know her at
> all.
>
> Who do you think knows her better?
>
> Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell Me, if
> you have understanding.
>
> Who determined its measurements? Surely you know! Or who stretched the
> line upon it?
>
> To what were its foundations fastened? Or who laid its cornerstone?
>
> Sam Sloan
Sam thrashing again with the usual 'I assume...' without **facts** and
'There is no paper trail...' but that won't stop me, nosirreee. I will
fabricate, insinuate, and slander as much as I can and put forth
baseless Sam-fantasies regarding Susan Polgar for the express purpose
of destroying her reputation, the continuation of the political
hacking I am so famous for, and the propogation of half-truths nobody
can verify and are impossible to confirm.
But hey, it's what Sam does best. Yep, you're the guy I want on the
E.B. .... NOT.
Total Hack you are.
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
|
| | |
Date: 03 Apr 2007 11:20:55
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
The members should consider the entire series of events. Polgar entered
into a five year agreement with the USCF to write a monthly Chess Secrets
column for Chess Life. The value of that contract over five years was
$30,000. The contract was agreed to by Frank Nero, Executive Director of
the USCF at that time. The date of the agreement was September 19, 2002.
In 2003 the Susan Polgar Foundation was created and Frank Niro was made a
Trustee of the Susan Polgar Foundation according to the SPF's 2003 IRS form
990EZ. One had does wash the other in chess politics.
<[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Apr 2, 4:01 pm, "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [quote="chrisfalter"][quote="SamSloan"]
>> To everyone's surprise, the Executive Director reported back a few
>> days later that Polgar had agreed to this. [/quote]
>>
>> I have never seen Polgar act with less than 100% integrity in her
>> financial affairs, so I am not surprised at all.[/quote]
>>
>> I have known Miss Polgar for 22 years.
>>
>> You have known her for what, three months? If indeed you know her at
>> all.
>>
>> Who do you think knows her better?
>>
>> Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell Me, if
>> you have understanding.
>>
>> Who determined its measurements? Surely you know! Or who stretched the
>> line upon it?
>>
>> To what were its foundations fastened? Or who laid its cornerstone?
>>
>> Sam Sloan
>
> Sam thrashing again with the usual 'I assume...' without **facts** and
> 'There is no paper trail...' but that won't stop me, nosirreee. I will
> fabricate, insinuate, and slander as much as I can and put forth
> baseless Sam-fantasies regarding Susan Polgar for the express purpose
> of destroying her reputation, the continuation of the political
> hacking I am so famous for, and the propogation of half-truths nobody
> can verify and are impossible to confirm.
>
> But hey, it's what Sam does best. Yep, you're the guy I want on the
> E.B. .... NOT.
>
> Total Hack you are.
>
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
> VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR! VOTE FOR POLGAR!
>
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2007 13:01:09
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
[quote="chrisfalter"][quote="SamSloan"]
To everyone's surprise, the Executive Director reported back a few
days later that Polgar had agreed to this. [/quote]
I have never seen Polgar act with less than 100% integrity in her
financial affairs, so I am not surprised at all.[/quote]
I have known Miss Polgar for 22 years.
You have known her for what, three months? If indeed you know her at
all.
Who do you think knows her better?
Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell Me, if
you have understanding.
Who determined its measurements? Surely you know! Or who stretched the
line upon it?
To what were its foundations fastened? Or who laid its cornerstone?
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2007 12:20:07
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
[quote="JerryLMacDonald"]Doesn't it seem there is more than these 2
documents? Both reference information not disclosed in the two
documents linked here. I have no idea, but I suspect the formal
contracts will surface soon.[/quote]
I agree. It seems odd that the paper trail ends here.
I would like to see more documents, or else a definitive statement
that there are no more documents concerning this matter.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2007 12:13:44
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:21 am Post subject: Re: More
fabrications by Mr. Sam Sloan Reply with quote
SusanPolgar wrote:
To the FOC members,
Once again, Mr. Sloan has clearly fabricated a large number of items
on the following posts:
- Polgar Opening Secrets Contract
- Entire purpose defeated to suspension of Polgar articles
Both posts have clearly violated a number of forums rules as well as
the Standards of Conduct for Executive Board Members. I officially
request for the threads to be removed and severe sanctions be applied
as Mr. Sloan has repeatedly violated the rules.
How many more times will Mr. Sloan be allowed to fabricate information
as he goes along while violating one forum rule after another to
damage my personal and professional reputation as well as others? Does
he have free range to make things up because it is election time? His
posts are outrageous and unacceptable.
I realize that you have very hard and thankless jobs. I appreciate
your efforts. Thank you for your attention in this very serious
matter.
Best wishes,
Susan Polgar
Ms. Polgar, are you saying that Mr. Sloan has fabricated the letters
forming your agreement to write the Opening Secrets column?
As to Mr. Sloan's other post, please advise exactly what he has
allegedly fabricated?
In closing, I note that you are back from the double standard
"sanction" imposed by Mr. Winchester for calling me dishonest. Did Mr.
Winchester advise you that it was all right for you to post to the
forum again? [Post:37568 Posted: Sat 31, 2007 3:38 pm] I expect
the moderators and the FOC to apply the AUG to you as they would to
anyone else from this point forward.
All the best,
Brian Lafferty
_________________
End the Censorship or Shut Down the Issues Forum
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2007 08:40:42
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
[quote="Brian Lafferty"]Correct me if I'm incorrect, but I make the
value of this five year agreement to be $30,000. Would this need to
be approved by the Executive Board as the contract value is over
$10,000? If that is the case, was this agreement approved by the
board?
I note that Frank Nero is listed as a Trustee of the Susan Polgar
Foundation on the foundation's initial Federal Form 990EZ filing for
the year 2003, shortly after this agreement was entered into on
September 19, 2002. Cozy relationship, IMO. Proper agreement?[/quote]
No. This agreement was NOT approved by the board. However, the board
found out about it within a few weeks. It caused a relatively minor
flap compared with the subsequent secret deals between Polgar, Truong
and Niro that the board knew nothing about.
The subsequent deals which the board had no idea about until after
Niro disappeared caused much bigger problems, especially the ch
2003 "Four Way Contract" involving the Woman's Olympiad Training
Program. After Niro left office, Truong demanded payment in the amount
of $50,000. I posted that contract a few weeks ago.
Then there were the deals Niro made with Polgar to pay her $2500 to
give a simultaneous exhibition at the Newburgh Rotary club, to pay her
$2 per player for appearing at a National Scholastic Event in
Nashville and to pay her for attending a delegates meeting in Los
Angeles in August 2003. These is no paper trail on these deals. As
noted previously, nearly all the financial records from that period
have been lost, misplaced or destroyed.
Any documents that remain would have been on that laptop computer that
was removed from the USCF's offices on August 20, 2003.
I assume that the September, 2002 letters that I have posted here were
obtained by Lucas from Mr. Truong. Mr. Lucas emailed them to the board
on January 23, 2007. Bill Hall did not have the documents and Lucas is
relatively new, so he must have obtained them from Truong. Of course,
we have no way of knowing whether there might be other documents that
have not been produced yet.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2007 08:37:30
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Polgar Opening Secrets agreement
|
[quote="Robgetty"][quote="samsloan"] These is no paper trail on these
deals. As noted previously, nearly all the financial records from that
period have been lost, misplaced or destroyed.
Sam Sloan[/quote]
Hasn't that statement been proven false multiple times?[/quote]
No. It has not been proven false, and thus far in the eight months
that I have been on the board not one single document has ever been
produced dated prior to 2005 that did not come from some other source.
For example, the Seattle Chess Foundation Contract and the Four Way
Contract was found in Michael Matsler's files and the current 2002
letters came from Lucas who presumably got them from Truong.
Bill Hall was supposed to produce an inventory of what is in the 125
storage boxes. He promised to do that seven months ago. So far he
still has not yet produced it.
Sam Sloan
|
|
