| |
Main
Date: 03 Feb 2009 15:20:28
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Did Donna Alarie Leak It??
|
Try to follow the convoluted "logic" and false assumption of Doug
Forsythe. Not his stellar conclusion:
"It is interesting that Lafferty that has not been interested in over
the board chess in nineteen (19) years and Lafferty that has only been
active with over the board chess only now twenty four (24) months would
have established a personal bonding with each other so deep that
Mottershead would have given Lafferty the Mottershead Report before it
was released to the New York Times. It is also interesting that three
(3) out of the four (4) over the board tournaments that Lafferty did
play in before the releasing of the Mottershead Report that Donna Alarie
was the Chief Tournament Director of the tournaments that Lafferty was in.
There is an old saying, it does not matter what you know it is who you
know that is important. Lafferty had his first over the board tournament
in February 2007 and the releasing of the Mottershead Report was in
August 2007, so that would be only be seven (7) months Lafferty was a
member of the United States Chess Federation. It begs the question:
someone introduced Brian Lafferty to Brian Mottershead, and had
connections with the United States Chess Federation to make Brian
Mottershead have confidence to release the Mottershead Report to
Lafferty before it was released to the New York Times.
With Lafferty having limited depth of experience before the releasing of
the Mottershead Report, the person in my judgment had the most contact
hours with Lafferty before the releasing of the Mottershead Report was
Donna Alarie. As Lafferty went to three (3) out of his four (4) over the
board tournaments to her events, therefore they were both in the same
building during these events and must had personal contact with each other.
This really begs the question, why is there this deep relationship with
Alarie, Mottershead and Lafferty. They are all from the same state of
Massachusetts, Alarie has thought of a run for the United States Chess
Federation Executive Board and Mottershead and Lafferty are now
candidates for the United States Chess Federation Executive Board. They
all have deep connections with posting information on the United States
Chess Federation Issue Forum.
In my judgment, the person that best fits the introduction of Brian
Lafferty to Brian Mottershead and would have made Mottershead feel a
need to release the Mottershead Report to Lafferty before it was release
to the public in a leak to the New York Times was Donna Alarie.
Now we are back to the unknown, as someone with authority within the
United States Chess Federation and had established connections with the
New York Times before the leaking had to be the unknown. Brian
Mottershead said he did not leak the information to the New York Times,
and Brian Lafferty was just a new member to the United States Chess
Federation at the time. Out of the three (3), Alarie, Lafferty and
Mottershead � Alarie had more connections with the New York Times.
In my judgment, the unknown is the unknown but in my judgment the
strongest candidate for this unknown person is Donna Alarie."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
| |
Date: 03 Feb 2009 08:04:43
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: Did Donna Alarie Leak It??
|
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:20:28 GMT, "B. Lafferty " <[email protected] >
wrote:
>Try to follow the convoluted "logic" and false assumption of Doug
>Forsythe. Not his stellar conclusion:
I think this guy posts over there under several different handles and
holds the record for most times using the phrase, "begs the question"
improperly. Why does "gibber" come to mind when reading him?
|
| |
Date: 03 Feb 2009 07:34:25
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Did Donna Alarie Leak It??
|
On Feb 3, 10:20=A0am, "B. Lafferty " <[email protected] > wrote:
(Snip conspiracy-mania.)
> ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Agreed. Thanks for sharing the nuttery.
|
|
