Main
Date: 01 Feb 2009 14:52:18
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Dilbert Speaks to Trolgar About Their Book Reviews
http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-02-01/




 
Date: 01 Feb 2009 18:54:41
From:
Subject: Re: Dilbert Speaks to Trolgar About Their Book Reviews

B. Lafferty wrote:
> http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-02-01/

And your qualifications for critiquing book reviews by people seven
rating classes above you would be?


  
Date: 02 Feb 2009 06:06:28
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Dilbert Speaks to Trolgar About Their Book Reviews
On Feb 1, 9:54=A0pm, jkh...@aim.com wrote:
> B. Lafferty =A0wrote:
> >http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-02-01/
>
> And your qualifications for critiquing book reviews by people seven
> rating classes above you would be?

Since forming an opinion on the qualities of a piece of writing has
nothing to do with chess, your remark is a non-sequitur.


  
Date: 02 Feb 2009 12:02:54
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Dilbert Speaks to Trolgar About Their Book Reviews
jkh001@aim.com wrote:
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>> http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-02-01/
>
> And your qualifications for critiquing book reviews by people seven
> rating classes above you would be?

ROTFL! Is your aging mind forgetting the fake reviews put on Amazon
trashing another's book and praising Polgar/Truong's book? One of them
being a give-away of Trolgar. It has nothing to do with my wring reviews.