|
Main
Date: 09 Aug 2008 02:10:12
From: Sam Sloan
Subject: Here is the case filed by the USCF in San Francisco last week
|
Here is the case filed by the USCF in the Superior Court of San Francisco last week. The name of the case is USCF vs. Does 1-10 http://www.anusha.com/uscf-does.pdf It is on the basic of this case that a legal proceeding was instituted against Polgar and Truong in Lubbock Texas last week, as obviously the persons who filed the case in San Francisco believe that the true identities of John Doe 1 and 2 are Susan Polgar and Paul Truong Sam Sloan
|
|
|
Date: 08 Aug 2008 21:59:33
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Here is the case filed by the USCF in San Francisco last week
|
On Aug 8, 9:10=A0pm, [email protected] (Sam Sloan) wrote: > Here is the case filed by the USCF in the Superior Court of San > Francisco last week. > > The name of the case is USCF vs. Does 1-10 > > http://www.anusha.com/uscf-does.pdf > > It is on the basic of this case that a legal proceeding was instituted > against Polgar and Truong in Lubbock Texas last week, as obviously the > persons who filed the case in San Francisco believe that the true > identities of John Doe 1 and 2 are Susan Polgar and Paul Truong > > Sam Sloan John Doe 1 could be BG and John Doe 2 could be Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 09 Aug 2008 18:32:33
From:
Subject: Re: Here is the case filed by the USCF in San Francisco last week
|
Rob wrote: > On Aug 8, 9:10=EF=BF=BDpm, [email protected] (Sam Sloan) wrote: > > Here is the case filed by the USCF in the Superior Court of San > > Francisco last week. > > > > The name of the case is USCF vs. Does 1-10 > > > > http://www.anusha.com/uscf-does.pdf > > > > It is on the basic of this case that a legal proceeding was instituted > > against Polgar and Truong in Lubbock Texas last week, as obviously the > > persons who filed the case in San Francisco believe that the true > > identities of John Doe 1 and 2 are Susan Polgar and Paul Truong > > > > Sam Sloan > > John Doe 1 could be BG and John Doe 2 could be Sam Sloan Really? It would be difficult for Bill Goichberg to obtain unauthorized access to his own account. And why exactly would Goichberg or Sloan have given the illegally obtained e-mails to Polgar to post on her forum? The bottom line is that either Polgar is responsible for hacking the accounts, or she knows who is.
|
| | |
Date: 10 Aug 2008 01:57:32
From: Brian Lafferty
Subject: Re: Here is the case filed by the USCF in San Francisco last week
|
[email protected] wrote: > > Rob wrote: >> On Aug 8, 9:10�pm, [email protected] (Sam Sloan) wrote: >>> Here is the case filed by the USCF in the Superior Court of San >>> Francisco last week. >>> >>> The name of the case is USCF vs. Does 1-10 >>> >>> http://www.anusha.com/uscf-does.pdf >>> >>> It is on the basic of this case that a legal proceeding was instituted >>> against Polgar and Truong in Lubbock Texas last week, as obviously the >>> persons who filed the case in San Francisco believe that the true >>> identities of John Doe 1 and 2 are Susan Polgar and Paul Truong >>> >>> Sam Sloan >> John Doe 1 could be BG and John Doe 2 could be Sam Sloan > > > Really? It would be difficult for Bill Goichberg to obtain > unauthorized access to his own account. And why exactly would > Goichberg or Sloan have given the illegally obtained e-mails to Polgar > to post on her forum? The bottom line is that either Polgar is > responsible for hacking the accounts, or she knows who is. I've read through the complaint a few times. It strikes me that one or more John Doe could be facing Federal wire fraud charges. That's a felony that leads to time in prison under mandatory sentencing, IIRC. I really do hope for his sake that Gregory Alexander did not cross the line for Trolgar. Time will tell. It's going to be a very interesting time, especially since Polgar and her attorney have sued Kronenberger personally and his firm. Polgar and some Lubbock lawyers must have mad cow disease.
|
|