| |
Main
Date: 28 Nov 2008 18:46:04
From: thumbody..
Subject: Quantity Of Shit - (aka) Quantum Of Solace..
|
I mean gruppe, this is just the stupidest thing - really..
No 1. I haven't seen the movie so I can't honestly comment but I will
anyway..
No 2. All of us know that Sean Connery is _the_ definitive James Bond &
that subsequent actors like Roger Moore, Piers Brosnan & that faggot
australian git Russell Jackaman don't make the grade. So what - uh?..
Well, this is what chaps! - Ian Fleming never in his gin-soaked excuse
of a life penned anything remotely similar to this pretentiously titled
hollywood excuse?..
Some stunted turd pom & his not so attractive brown-person female
side-copulant do'nt make a good james bond movie. I decline to absorb
this crude hollywood crap unless otherwise forced..
The thing is Sean & Roger & Michael, stand tall among small people..
t.
|
|
| |
Date: 28 Nov 2008 05:23:47
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Quantity Of Shit - (aka) Quantum Of Solace..
|
On Nov 28, 2:46=A0am, "thumbody.." <[email protected] > wrote:
> I mean gruppe, this is just the stupidest thing - really..
>
> No 1. I haven't seen the movie so I can't honestly comment but I will
> anyway..
Thy toungue rattleth, but thy mind sleeps.
> No 2. All of us know that Sean Connery is _the_ definitive James Bond &
> that subsequent actors like Roger Moore, Piers Brosnan & that faggot
> australian git Russell Jackaman don't make the grade.
Non sequitur. My favorite James Bond is
also SC, however, that does not mean I want
to watch his dead or dying corpse computer-
mapped into every new Bond movie that
comes along. At some point in time, one
must learn to accept the process of aging,
and that life goes on (Bobby Fischer fanatics
take note).
> So what - uh?..
>
> Well, this is what chaps! - Ian Fleming never in his gin-soaked excuse
> of a life penned anything remotely similar to this pretentiously titled
> hollywood excuse?..
You know, Aron Nimzowitch never penned
the famous parody of him, yet it still was a
big success.
> Some stunted turd pom & his not so attractive brown-person female
> side-copulant do'nt make a good james bond movie.
One suspects -- merely suspects, mind you
-- that you desire to view women as objects.
They must stay firmly in their places, as mere
props in the movie-- like the Aston Martin car,
the Walther PPK pistol, and so forth.
> I decline to absorb
> this crude hollywood crap unless otherwise forced..
You are so right. Far better is the stuff
produced back home: Rumpole of the Bailey,
the Apollo moon landings, the life of Winston
Churchill, etc., etc.
Hollywood just keeps rehashing the same
old stuff, and much like some folks here in
rgc, is utterly obsessed with New York City,
with the ultra-wealthy, and last but certainly
not least, with violence.
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 29 Nov 2008 06:56:19
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Quantity Of Shit - (aka) Quantum Of Solace..
|
On Nov 29, 2:46=A0am, "thumbody.." <[email protected] > wrote:
> I dost not thinketh my present environment support the presence of
> mojave rattl'ers.
It's not the rattlers you need to worry about;
it's the scortching sun and the lack of water.
> > > No 2. All of us know that Sean Connery is _the_ definitive James Bond=
&
> > > that subsequent actors like Roger Moore, Piers Brosnan & that faggot
> > > australian git Russell Jackaman don't make the grade.
>
> > =A0 Non sequitur.
>
> All my life it seems to me people throw fancy sounding logical
> constructs in my face & retire with some gloat..
Ah, but these days you have merely to type
the confusing words into a Google search box,
press the "enter" key, and POW-- deliverance
from ignorance!
Granted, I ought to learn to use plain English,
leaving off archaic terms which serve mainly
to appease the haughty scholastic types.
> The twat under consideration @ the moment help-spam is the star of such
> famous movies as gladiator, masta & commander etc. This is no Victor
> Mature, Humphrey Heston or Robert Mitcham - you dig?..
If you can produce *objective* standards by
which to judge famous actors, I'm all ears.
But if "the best you've got" is personal opinion,
well then, "I'm just gonna have to kill you" (Steven
Segal quote).
> For examps. - last week I attempted to weigh through this 'gladiator'
> offering (shades of sparticus) & with some disgust changed channels a
> third of the way through to re-visit 'a clockwork orange' a movie by the
> chess afficiando director Kubrik S. (pom).
> This was much more worthwhile! & without saying so there was no return
> to gladiator..
I think I saw Gladiator a while back; the fact
that I'm not quite certain tells the tale, for who
could forget any /real movie/, like say, Ben Hur?
> > =A0 =A0You know, Aron Nimzowitch never penned
> > the famous parody of him, yet it still was a
> > big success.
> Look here blot - I have no idea whatsoever you mean to reference Nimzo &
> his 'system' see;http://www.historyguide.org/europe/lecture2.html& if
> you are prone to prevaricate you may consider "the will to a system is a
> lack of integrity" - Nietzshe aphorism 23..
Power? That's a bunch of hooey. What really
matters in life is not to become an isolani, but
instead to enjoy the pleasure of having many
(or else one really good) beautiful Queens all
around, as after advancing and promoting a
group of connected passed pawns.
Like Albert Einstein, Socrates and so many
other famous wits, Mr. Nietzshe simply failed
to understand chess.
> Women should be enthroned bot, maybe placed on a pedestal bot certainly
> not subjected to sati in my view. If you're not clear on 'sati' bot,
> query subcontinental swammy - dig?..
Pip pip!
> Memorably though, the Speilberg direction & production of H G Wells's
> 'War Of The Worlds' was the best & I did appreciate 'Saving Private
> Ryan'..
I never saw that one. Perhaps the best of the
war genre are those movies which, instead of
glorifying war and attempting to morph its
innumerable blunders into "dying for one's
country/religion/rock band", make an honest
attempt at portraying wars' reality; and if I
may grasp at straws, those which somehow
manage to show both sides-- not just the
perspective of the so-called winners. For
instance, Goodbye to All That.
OTOH, I did enjoy the slanted movie: The
Best Years of Our Lives.
Most of the modern war movies seem to be
all hat and no cattle; I mean, all special effects
and no significant story. Yet despite their
narrow focus on computer-effects and/or
explosives, most seem to utterly fail when it
comes to grasping simple laws of physics.
One can only conclude that the folks behind
the computers and the directors/producers
are nitwits, raised on "Duke Nukem" games
instead of wholesome stuff, like "Lassie"... .
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 29 Nov 2008 18:46:03
From: thumbody..
Subject: Re: Quantity Of Shit - (aka) Quantum Of Solace..
|
help bot wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2:46 am, "thumbody.." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I mean gruppe, this is just the stupidest thing - really..
> >
> > No 1. I haven't seen the movie so I can't honestly comment but I will
> > anyway..
>
> Thy toungue rattleth, but thy mind sleeps.
I dost not thinketh my present environment support the presence of
mojave rattl'ers. Doubtless, I may perforce be proven erroneous -
venious vipers such as;http://www.kidcyber.com.au/topics/taipan.htm are
@ _all_ times worthy of consideration - no?..
>
> > No 2. All of us know that Sean Connery is _the_ definitive James Bond &
> > that subsequent actors like Roger Moore, Piers Brosnan & that faggot
> > australian git Russell Jackaman don't make the grade.
>
> Non sequitur.
All my life it seems to me people throw fancy sounding logical
constructs in my face & retire with some gloat..
The twat under consideration @ the moment help-spam is the star of such
famous movies as gladiator, masta & commander etc. This is no Victor
Mature, Humphrey Heston or Robert Mitcham - you dig?..
For examps. - last week I attempted to weigh through this 'gladiator'
offering (shades of sparticus) & with some disgust changed channels a
third of the way through to re-visit 'a clockwork orange' a movie by the
chess afficiando director Kubrik S. (pom).
This was much more worthwhile! & without saying so there was no return
to gladiator..
>My favorite James Bond is
> also SC, however, that does not mean I want
> to watch his dead or dying corpse computer-
> mapped into every new Bond movie that
> comes along.
Yes. Quite so! - I need to say 'they' (the bond series of movies
starring sc) turned me on from the beginning & in the eventuality of the
genre there was one, just recently, I don't recall it's provenance which
excelled & starred the bros. (Brosnan)..
> At some point in time, one
> must learn to accept the process of aging,
> and that life goes on (Bobby Fischer fanatics
> take note).
>
> > So what - uh?..
> >
> > Well, this is what chaps! - Ian Fleming never in his gin-soaked excuse
> > of a life penned anything remotely similar to this pretentiously titled
> > hollywood excuse?..
>
> You know, Aron Nimzowitch never penned
> the famous parody of him, yet it still was a
> big success.
Look here blot - I have no idea whatsoever you mean to reference Nimzo &
his 'system' see; http://www.historyguide.org/europe/lecture2.html & if
you are prone to prevaricate you may consider "the will to a system is a
lack of integrity" - Nietzshe aphorism 23..
>
> > Some stunted turd pom & his not so attractive brown-person female
> > side-copulant do'nt make a good james bond movie.
>
> One suspects -- merely suspects, mind you
> -- that you desire to view women as objects.
> They must stay firmly in their places, as mere
> props in the movie-- like the Aston Martin car,
> the Walther PPK pistol, and so forth.
Women should be enthroned bot, maybe placed on a pedestal bot certainly
not subjected to sati in my view. If you're not clear on 'sati' bot,
query subcontinental swammy - dig?..
>
> > I decline to absorb
> > this crude hollywood crap unless otherwise forced..
>
> You are so right. Far better is the stuff
> produced back home: Rumpole of the Bailey,
> the Apollo moon landings, the life of Winston
> Churchill, etc., etc.
> Hollywood just keeps rehashing the same
> old stuff,
I suppose so..
Memorably though, the Speilberg direction & production of H G Wells's
'War Of The Worlds' was the best & I did appreciate 'Saving Private
Ryan'..
t.
>and much like some folks here in
> rgc, is utterly obsessed with New York City,
> with the ultra-wealthy, and last but certainly
> not least, with violence.
>
> -- help bot
|
|
