|
Main
Date: 19 May 2008 04:08:00
From: samsloan
Subject: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa What Polgar actually wrote seems reasonable unless one considers the fact that when they ran for election they knew that the board met four times a year and the most important part of their duties was that they would be expected to attend those four meeting. It was known months in advance that there would be a meeting this past weekend in Tulsa. No doubt some details were not provided but they knew that there would be a meeting. It is to be recalled that they announced that they would not be attending the first meeting of the board, which was held in Crossville, because of a "security breach". However, to everybody's surprise, they showed up anyway. That is where they were served with a summons and complaint. The second meeting was held online because Truong refused to travel to California to attend and Goichberg refused to travel to any other state because he was living in California at the time. Here is what Polgar (or Trollgar as they are known because it is impossible to tell which are written by Polgar and which are written by Truong) actually wrote explaining why she did not remain for another day in Tulsa so that she attend the third meeting, that was concluded in Tulsa yesterday: "A. Because the exact details were presented to us too late to make the proper arrangements. Randy Bauer complained about this as well. The details should have been given to all board members at least a month in advance and not a week or so. Some board members do not have children or just grown children. Their schedules are more flexible. "B. Many board members have attended the meetings by phone in the past. This is nothing unusual about this. I worry more about the state of the USCF and not this issue. I am currently on 3 non-profit boards and we do many of our meetings by phone with the other two. "We met Bill G., Bill H., Jim B., Pat Knight and others in Tulsa. The only 2 we did not meet were Randy Hough and Randy Bauer. Overall, the meeting went quite well I think. I think we covered a lot of issues which I believe will help the USCF. As I stated before, we obviously have a number of differences in opinion and some compromises were made. Most of the votes went 6-0 with a few minor abstentions. "There will be more discussions with Bill Hall and Bill Goichberg in the near future about increasing the USCF revenues via sponsorship, advertisement, and donation. It is up to them to accept our offer to help or not. "Susan Polgar"
|
|
|
Date: 22 May 2008 15:46:04
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
From: <[email protected] > Date: Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:52 AM Subject: Show me the money Frank K. Berry and Jim Berry made a generous offer to pay for a top of the line $7,500 a night hotel suite, $100,000 in appearance fees, a priceless chess set, 33% stock holdings in Stillwater National Bank, a spanking new Mercedes S-class, and many more incredible perks. All board members walked away from the meeting with a bag full of cash, gold Rolex, and so much more. Tell that someone who is asking to try running for the board himself. It is good to be a board member of the very rich USCF. Shhhhhh, but you must not leak this out to the general public. Otherwise, there would be nothing left for the rest of us in the future. On May 22, 10:39 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa > for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and > therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday > and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel > expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? > > Does anybody know the answer to this question? > > Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 29 May 2008 14:59:37
From: Anonymous Sender
Subject: Texas Third Court of Appeals
|
samsloan <[email protected] > wrote on 22 May 2008: > From: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:52 AM > Subject: Show me the money > > Frank K. Berry and Jim Berry made a generous offer to pay for a top of > the line $7,500 a night hotel suite, $100,000 in appearance fees, a > priceless chess set, 33% stock holdings in Stillwater National Bank, a > spanking new Mercedes S-class, and many more incredible perks. > > All board members walked away from the meeting with a bag full of > cash, gold Rolex, and so much more. Tell that someone who is asking to > try running for the board himself. It is good to be a board member of > the very rich USCF. Shhhhhh, but you must not leak this out to the > general public. Otherwise, there would be nothing left for the rest of > us in the future. There's a gold Rolex on line 7, Sammy-boy. Got it? If you are a good Sammy-boy, we'll show you another gold Rolex from 2006. Can you then join the dots, hey boy? If you join the dots you'll probably find the folk who canceled hundreds of your posts and got them remove from the google-archive. > On May 22, 10:39 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa > > for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and > > therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday > > and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel > > expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? > > > > Does anybody know the answer to this question? I thought you knew the answer, Sam H. Sloan. Who wrote what is below? Or do you now deny it, blame it on a forger or? While you were looking for the gold Rolexes (the second one is on the 7th line from the bottom), did she abort another of them? Now the Texas Third Court of Appeals has ruled that the kids were not proven to be in any immediate danger, that means they were snatched illegally from the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Isn't this great news for all those who seek to dupe naive stupid women and then enslave them? It even justifies >>> my $50,000 annual expense account Now that I have been elected, I must implement my agenda, which includes a $60,000 annual expense account for myself, an amendment to OMOV to SMHV (Some Members Hundred Votes) which will make my re-election after the one year ends an unnecessary cost which can be dispensed with, a $70,000 annual expense account for myself, apparent greater transparency for the one-tiered USCF membership with the compulsory use of Khowar for BINFO material and strict adherence to Chitrali accounting standards, an $80,000 annual expense account for myself, a reduction in the dues for all female members except Truong and Brock, a $90,000 annual expense account for myself, appointment of Larry Parr and Peter A. Sloan (a chess writter) as joint editors-in-chief of Chess Life with Larry's cute daughter often on the front cover, a $100,000 annual expense account for myself, use of my photographs, profile, books and websites as marketing tools for the USCF with anusha.com linked to the official USCF site, a $110,000 annual expense account for myself, 100 free rating points to all my supporters in rgcp and 200 free rating points to all my detractors, critics, confessed anonymice and forgers, a $120,000 annual expense account for myself, a quick sale of the Crossville property to some of my contacts at a bargain price for the federation, a $130,000 annual expense account for myself, legal actions to get back all the hundreds of thousands of dollars in total paid in fees, salaries or expenses to Marinello and many others, some suits going back to 1982, a $140,000 annual expense account for myself, very special individual treatment and personal couching on the Damiano etc. for a three-tiered sideways selection from the 50,000+ young members of the USCF and a modest $150,000 annual expense account for myself. But I need a little help to ensure that the other members of the EB cannot subvert my agenda, which if I may recall included a modest $160,000 annual expense account for myself. The best way to get people to co-operate is to persuade them, but folk like Hough can't be persuaded. Look what happened to him at the tournament on Thursday. And that was before he heard about the $170,000 annual expense account for myself and my plans to exempt practising Muslims from Ethics Committee purview and to reinstate Booby Fischer in the Chess Hall of Fame. If people can't be persuaded then they can be bribed or blackmailed. Of course I would never approve or allow bribes or blackmail. For one thing, if there were a lot of bribes paid from the LMF liable, there might not be enough money for the $180,000 annual expense account for myself. That leaves blackmail, but not by me, naturally, as I strongly disapprove of being blackmailed. If anyone reading this has any dirt on any of my fellow EB members or USCF officials, please email it to [email protected] who has no connection with me or with my $190,000 annual expense account. The sort of thing he might be interested in includes, not just for them but for any one close to them, extramarital affairs, payments to hookers, IRS investigations, transvestisism, gay liaisons, felonies, bastards, financial irregularities, failed marriages, date rapes, suspicious foreign travel, use of sexist, homophobic, ageist, racist language, slave children, past business failures, prosecutions (even if unsuccessful), expense account abuse, securities fraud, alligations, imprisonments, child abuse, past failed businesses, inappropriate websites, embarassing personal photographs of them or their family members, bull-dykery. Really, anything they'd prefer not to get widely known, unlike my $200,000 annual expense account which, in the interests of transparency and of annoying people (except Susan Polgar, who I am confident is warming up to me again) I am openly advertising. That way, my fellow EB members may be more likely to assist in the agenda, without all demanding expense accounts too. If you want you can send the information anonymously by opening a webmail account with gmail or usa.com, but then you won't get the 300 free rating points because we won't have a name or USCF membership number. You can still get an allowance from the soon-to-be-opened USCF playpal account to you one, but not from my $210,000 annual expense account. I have completed updating my pages at the Wikipedia, mentioning my triumph (technically, as I explain, I got more votes than Randy), my resignation from the Libertarian Party, my Gold Rolex from Kirsan but not as yet mentioning my $220,000 annual expense account. Your help with my agenda will save the planet and the USCF faces a bright future as it adopts Shogi and Chess960 on an equal footing to chess. Did I remember to tell you about the $230,000 annual expense account for myself, which will all go to the most worthy causes? > > Sam Sloan So do not miss the other gold Rolex 7, lines above the end. Coincidence? haha. SURE. Didja connect the dots, Sammy-boy?
|
| |
Date: 29 May 2008 15:26:33
From: Anonymous Remailer (austria)
Subject: Texas Third Court of Appeals
|
samsloan <[email protected] > wrote on 22 May 2008: > From: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:52 AM > Subject: Show me the money > > Frank K. Berry and Jim Berry made a generous offer to pay for a top of > the line $7,500 a night hotel suite, $100,000 in appearance fees, a > priceless chess set, 33% stock holdings in Stillwater National Bank, a > spanking new Mercedes S-class, and many more incredible perks. > > All board members walked away from the meeting with a bag full of > cash, gold Rolex, and so much more. Tell that someone who is asking to > try running for the board himself. It is good to be a board member of > the very rich USCF. Shhhhhh, but you must not leak this out to the > general public. Otherwise, there would be nothing left for the rest of > us in the future. There's a gold Rolex on line 7, Sammy-boy. Got it? If you are a good Sammy-boy, we'll show you another gold Rolex from 2006. Can you then join the dots, hey boy? If you join the dots you'll probably find the folk who canceled hundreds of your posts and got them remove from the google-archive. > On May 22, 10:39 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa > > for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and > > therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday > > and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel > > expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? > > > > Does anybody know the answer to this question? I thought you knew the answer, Sam H. Sloan. Who wrote what is below? Or do you now deny it, blame it on a forger or? While you were looking for the gold Rolexes (the second one is on the 7th line from the bottom), did she abort another of them? Now the Texas Third Court of Appeals has ruled that the kids were not proven to be in any immediate danger, that means they were snatched illegally from the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Isn't this great news for all those who seek to dupe naive stupid women and then enslave them? It even justifies >>> my $50,000 annual expense account Now that I have been elected, I must implement my agenda, which includes a $60,000 annual expense account for myself, an amendment to OMOV to SMHV (Some Members Hundred Votes) which will make my re-election after the one year ends an unnecessary cost which can be dispensed with, a $70,000 annual expense account for myself, apparent greater transparency for the one-tiered USCF membership with the compulsory use of Khowar for BINFO material and strict adherence to Chitrali accounting standards, an $80,000 annual expense account for myself, a reduction in the dues for all female members except Truong and Brock, a $90,000 annual expense account for myself, appointment of Larry Parr and Peter A. Sloan (a chess writter) as joint editors-in-chief of Chess Life with Larry's cute daughter often on the front cover, a $100,000 annual expense account for myself, use of my photographs, profile, books and websites as marketing tools for the USCF with anusha.com linked to the official USCF site, a $110,000 annual expense account for myself, 100 free rating points to all my supporters in rgcp and 200 free rating points to all my detractors, critics, confessed anonymice and forgers, a $120,000 annual expense account for myself, a quick sale of the Crossville property to some of my contacts at a bargain price for the federation, a $130,000 annual expense account for myself, legal actions to get back all the hundreds of thousands of dollars in total paid in fees, salaries or expenses to Marinello and many others, some suits going back to 1982, a $140,000 annual expense account for myself, very special individual treatment and personal couching on the Damiano etc. for a three-tiered sideways selection from the 50,000+ young members of the USCF and a modest $150,000 annual expense account for myself. But I need a little help to ensure that the other members of the EB cannot subvert my agenda, which if I may recall included a modest $160,000 annual expense account for myself. The best way to get people to co-operate is to persuade them, but folk like Hough can't be persuaded. Look what happened to him at the tournament on Thursday. And that was before he heard about the $170,000 annual expense account for myself and my plans to exempt practising Muslims from Ethics Committee purview and to reinstate Booby Fischer in the Chess Hall of Fame. If people can't be persuaded then they can be bribed or blackmailed. Of course I would never approve or allow bribes or blackmail. For one thing, if there were a lot of bribes paid from the LMF liable, there might not be enough money for the $180,000 annual expense account for myself. That leaves blackmail, but not by me, naturally, as I strongly disapprove of being blackmailed. If anyone reading this has any dirt on any of my fellow EB members or USCF officials, please email it to [email protected] who has no connection with me or with my $190,000 annual expense account. The sort of thing he might be interested in includes, not just for them but for any one close to them, extramarital affairs, payments to hookers, IRS investigations, transvestisism, gay liaisons, felonies, bastards, financial irregularities, failed marriages, date rapes, suspicious foreign travel, use of sexist, homophobic, ageist, racist language, slave children, past business failures, prosecutions (even if unsuccessful), expense account abuse, securities fraud, alligations, imprisonments, child abuse, past failed businesses, inappropriate websites, embarassing personal photographs of them or their family members, bull-dykery. Really, anything they'd prefer not to get widely known, unlike my $200,000 annual expense account which, in the interests of transparency and of annoying people (except Susan Polgar, who I am confident is warming up to me again) I am openly advertising. That way, my fellow EB members may be more likely to assist in the agenda, without all demanding expense accounts too. If you want you can send the information anonymously by opening a webmail account with gmail or usa.com, but then you won't get the 300 free rating points because we won't have a name or USCF membership number. You can still get an allowance from the soon-to-be-opened USCF playpal account to you one, but not from my $210,000 annual expense account. I have completed updating my pages at the Wikipedia, mentioning my triumph (technically, as I explain, I got more votes than Randy), my resignation from the Libertarian Party, my Gold Rolex from Kirsan but not as yet mentioning my $220,000 annual expense account. Your help with my agenda will save the planet and the USCF faces a bright future as it adopts Shogi and Chess960 on an equal footing to chess. Did I remember to tell you about the $230,000 annual expense account for myself, which will all go to the most worthy causes? > > Sam Sloan So do not miss the other gold Rolex 7, lines above the end. Coincidence? haha. SURE. Didja connect the dots, Sammy-boy? Extra - -- - Adolfuss is rogue canceling your postings, Sammy-boy.
|
|
Date: 22 May 2008 07:39:27
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? Does anybody know the answer to this question? Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 22 May 2008 17:10:16
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R.?=
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
"samsloan" <[email protected] > schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:5ac0a69e-8fba-451c-a11a-1486570c2486@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa > for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and > therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday > and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel > expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? > > Does anybody know the answer to this question? Yes, several people are sure to know. Why don't you ask one of your many friends and admirers on the USCF staff? Or on the board?
|
|
Date: 19 May 2008 08:08:15
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa What Polgar actually wrote seems reasonable unless one considers the fact that when they ran for election they knew that the board met four times a year and the most important part of their duties was that they would be expected to attend those four meeting. It was known months in advance that there would be a meeting this past weekend in Tulsa. No doubt some details were not provided but they knew that there would be a meeting. It is to be recalled that they announced that they would not be attending the first meeting of the board, which was held in Crossville, because of a "security breach". However, to everybody's surprise, they showed up anyway. That is where they were served with a summons and complaint. The second meeting was held online because Truong refused to travel to California to attend and Goichberg refused to travel to any other state because he was living in California at the time. Here is what Polgar (or Trollgar as they are known because it is impossible to tell which are written by Polgar and which are written by Truong) actually wrote explaining why she spent three days in Tulsa last week but did not remain for another day in Tulsa so that she could attend the third meeting that was concluded in Tulsa yesterday: "A. Because the exact details were presented to us too late to make the proper arrangements. Randy Bauer complained about this as well. The details should have been given to all board members at least a month in advance and not a week or so. Some board members do not have children or just grown children. Their schedules are more flexible. "B. Many board members have attended the meetings by phone in the past. This is nothing unusual about this. I worry more about the state of the USCF and not this issue. I am currently on 3 non-profit boards and we do many of our meetings by phone with the other two. "We met Bill G., Bill H., Jim B., Pat Knight and others in Tulsa. The only 2 we did not meet were Randy Hough and Randy Bauer. Overall, the meeting went quite well I think. I think we covered a lot of issues which I believe will help the USCF. As I stated before, we obviously have a number of differences in opinion and some compromises were made. Most of the votes went 6-0 with a few minor abstentions. "There will be more discussions with Bill Hall and Bill Goichberg in the near future about increasing the USCF revenues via sponsorship, advertisement, and donation. It is up to them to accept our offer to help or not. "Susan Polgar"
|
|