| |
Main
Date: 12 Dec 2008 16:28:41
From: samsloan
Subject: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
fray.
Sam Sloan
|
|
| |
Date: 13 Jan 2009 14:16:10
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Sam the Slug to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Jan 13, 4:14=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Jan 13, 7:39 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Where is mine??? Oh my! Sloanster.. what about you inside report?
>
> I am so deeply disappointed that you did not run.
> And here, I promised you my full undying support
> You just cannot count on anybody any more
> This, after all the things I did for you to help you run.
>
> And what about all those nifty little slogans I thought up, to help
> you during your campaign?
> Here is one that I decided not to use, because it is out of meter. It
> does not rhyme right.
> Perhaps you can fix it up and use it during your next campaign.
>
> Rob the Robber really likes you
> He will tell sue to screw you blue
> Vote for Rob the Robber
>
> You can see that there is a problem.
Yes, there is. Sue is a name, and the first letter should be
capitalized.
> Let me know when you have got it fixed.
|
| |
Date: 13 Jan 2009 13:14:11
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Sam the Slug to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Jan 13, 7:39 am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
>
> Where is mine??? Oh my! Sloanster.. what about you inside report?
I am so deeply disappointed that you did not run.
And here, I promised you my full undying support
You just cannot count on anybody any more
This, after all the things I did for you to help you run.
And what about all those nifty little slogans I thought up, to help
you during your campaign?
Here is one that I decided not to use, because it is out of meter. It
does not rhyme right.
Perhaps you can fix it up and use it during your next campaign.
Rob the Robber really likes you
He will tell sue to screw you blue
Vote for Rob the Robber
You can see that there is a problem.
Let me know when you have got it fixed.
|
| |
Date: 08 Jan 2009 06:11:50
From: Rob
Subject: Re:Sam the Slug to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 31 2008, 10:29=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 31, 10:19=A0am, The Historian <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 31, 11:08=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > Excuse for what? For asking you why you are publishing NDA's in a
> > > public newsgroup -
>
> > Did Mr. Sloan sign a NDA?
>
> I can say this. There were 4 revisions of the "operating agreement"
> What Sloan has linked to his site is version 3. The other party
> violated the NDA. The other party has already lost one 21 million
> dollar lawsuit.
>
I wish Mr. Sloan much success with Ishi press. Perhaps one day he
will
have assets =A0worth suing him for. Until that time he continues to be
little more than a bothersome gadfly.
|
| |
Date: 08 Jan 2009 05:55:04
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Jan 8, 6:10=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> Rob the Robber is for you
> His gal sue will screw you too
> Vote for Rob the Robber
"Sue" should have a capital "S".
|
| |
Date: 08 Jan 2009 03:10:46
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
Rob the Robber is for you
His gal sue will screw you too
Vote for Rob the Robber
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 08:29:41
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 31, 10:19=A0am, The Historian <[email protected] >
wrote:
> On Dec 31, 11:08=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Excuse for what? For asking you why you are publishing NDA's in a
> > public newsgroup -
>
> Did Mr. Sloan sign a NDA?
I can say this. There were 4 revisions of the "operating agreement"
What Sloan has linked to his site is version 3. The other party
violated the NDA. The other party has already lost one 21 million
dollar lawsuit.
I wish Mr. Sloan much success with Ishi press. Prehaps one day he will
have assetts worth suing him for.
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 08:19:31
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 31, 11:08=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> Excuse for what? For asking you why you are publishing NDA's in a
> public newsgroup -
Did Mr. Sloan sign a NDA?
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 08:08:20
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 31, 10:37=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 31, 9:25=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
> > > What is your excuse or explanation for this?
>
> > > Sam Sloan
>
> > I understand that Sam Sloan has already been informed that there is a
> > confidentiality clause binding both parties. If he forgot, then here
> > is a reminder, so that he doesn't excite even more legal tangles by
> > his enthusiasms. But why is he Sam Sloan actually asking anything at
> > all? Is it because he fears a chess-politics opponent?
>
> > What does Sam Sloan want in terms of 'explanation'? Explain what,
> > exactly? How much tv programs cost to make in Iceland?
>
> > I have Fischer's 'buddy-guard's' e-mail and his cell number, and a
> > record of his conversations with me. Some dozen people know about the
> > propositions flying around concerning a match which would be televised
> > - [2 regularly contribute here]. I am not bound by any confidentiality
> > agreement, so can say as I wish.
>
> > But why should I wish to say anything at all? What is the import of
> > the matter to Sam Sloan, or to anyone else?
>
> > Phil Innes
> > Vermont
>
> Fischer is dead and your counter part has posted the contract on his
> website, so if there ever was a confidentiality agreement, it is no
> longer binding.
As I understand it the contract referenced is not with Fischer - it is
between Gothic Chess and CMM.
Sam Sloan gets things completely wrong as an excuse to avoid answering
what Sam Sloan or anyone else's interest in this could be. Sloan asks
questions about what exactly?
> So, what is your next excuse?
Excuse for what? For asking you why you are publishing NDA's in a
public newsgroup - and why you think anyone is robbing anyone else,
and how much Sam Sloan thinks a big-deal movie would cost to make in
Iceland?
> Thanks for finally admitting above that Rob the Robber is at least
> thinking of running.
Running what?
I say you perceive him as a political opponent and this is your motive
for doing as you have. I didn't say he was running for any post. I
said you thought he was. Get it? Do you actually understand how
screwed up you are over such simple issues.
1) An NDA exists which proscribes Rob Mitchell answering your question
to him.
2) You are unable to say why you think anyone is trying to rob anyone
else
3) You assert that I say Rob Mitchell is 'running' when what I said is
that you think he is running, and therefore 'the treatment'.
If you can do this to a simple post here on usenet, take 3 issues and
get them all wrong - then how does this recommend you for doing
anything more complicated than sweeping a straight corridor?
Phil Innes
> Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 07:37:30
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 31, 9:25=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> > What is your excuse or explanation for this?
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> I understand that Sam Sloan has already been informed that there is a
> confidentiality clause binding both parties. If he forgot, then here
> is a reminder, so that he doesn't excite even more legal tangles by
> his enthusiasms. But why is he Sam Sloan actually asking anything at
> all? Is it because he fears a chess-politics opponent?
>
> What does Sam Sloan want in terms of 'explanation'? Explain what,
> exactly? How much tv programs cost to make in Iceland?
>
> I have Fischer's 'buddy-guard's' e-mail and his cell number, and a
> record of his conversations with me. Some dozen people know about the
> propositions flying around concerning a match which would be televised
> - [2 regularly contribute here]. I am not bound by any confidentiality
> agreement, so can say as I wish.
>
> But why should I wish to say anything at all? What is the import of
> the matter to Sam Sloan, or to anyone else?
>
> Phil Innes
> Vermont
Fischer is dead and your counter part has posted the contract on his
website, so if there ever was a confidentiality agreement, it is no
longer binding.
So, what is your next excuse?
Thanks for finally admitting above that Rob the Robber is at least
thinking of running.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 06:25:30
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
> What is your excuse or explanation for this?
>
> Sam Sloan
I understand that Sam Sloan has already been informed that there is a
confidentiality clause binding both parties. If he forgot, then here
is a reminder, so that he doesn't excite even more legal tangles by
his enthusiasms. But why is he Sam Sloan actually asking anything at
all? Is it because he fears a chess-politics opponent?
What does Sam Sloan want in terms of 'explanation'? Explain what,
exactly? How much tv programs cost to make in Iceland?
I have Fischer's 'buddy-guard's' e-mail and his cell number, and a
record of his conversations with me. Some dozen people know about the
propositions flying around concerning a match which would be televised
- [2 regularly contribute here]. I am not bound by any confidentiality
agreement, so can say as I wish.
But why should I wish to say anything at all? What is the import of
the matter to Sam Sloan, or to anyone else?
Phil Innes
Vermont
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 04:31:51
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 29, 10:13=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 29, 5:57=A0am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > is because of your attempt to swindle that fledgling entrepreneur Ed
> > Trice out of $35,000 by claiming that you had made a deal with Bobby
> > Fischer to play in a chess match.
>
> I will not discuss this here. It is a lie. That is all I will say
> about it.
>
> The Mitch
We know why you will not discuss it here. You will not discuss it here
because we have proof that you are guilty.
On the Internet a letter is posted on your stationary and your
letterhead with your office address on it which states that you are in
contact with Bobby Fischer who has agreed to play a chess match that
you will videotape. The letter demands payment of $35,000 in advance
for arranging this chess match and videotaping.
Here is an exact quote from your letter:
http://www.gothicchess.com/images/blog/CMM_rev_3.jpg
7. CMM will be paid a one-time $35,000 stipend as an initial infusion
of capital to be used for the general operational budget of the
current project.
8. CMM, in good faith, will be responsible for obtaining initial
player contracts and maintaining player participation but will not be
held liable if the participants, for whatever reason, failed to agree
of perform. The players who have initially agreed to participate are
Mr. Robert James Fischer and Mr. Anatoly Karpov. In case of default by
the above named participant, alternate players will be sought by CMM
and agreed upon by GCF.
What is your excuse or explanation for this?
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 22:42:07
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
I'M THE REAL ROB THE ROBBER, YES, ME!!! I'M THE DREAD PIRATE ROBERT!
YOU'LL NEVER CATCH ME THOUGH, BECAUSE I STOLE THIS COMPUTER FROM THE
BACK OF A DELIVERY TRUCK!
OH DEARY ME, DEARY ME, THIS FLAMEWAR OVER MY REPUTATION IS SO
HILARIOUS, NONE OF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!
I'M ON A MISSION OF VENGEANCE BECAUSE SAM SLOAN IMPREGNATED MY
UNDERAGE THAI MOTHER, BUT I STILL LOST MY VIRGINITY BEFORE HIM!
I'M JUST REACHING OUT FOR MY DADDY, BUT HE HATES ME SO MUCH, WHY PAPA
SAMMIE, WHY? WE COULD PLAY CHESS TOGETHER IN THE PARKS! WE COULD SUE
THE LIVING HELL OUT OF RANDOM PEOPLE FOR THE HELL OF IT!
WE COULD EVEN TAKE A STRESS TEST FOR THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY!
p.s. I THINK HEATH LEDGER DID A GREAT JOB PLAYING AS BATMAN, AND
MORGAN FREEMAN DID A GREAT JOB AS PLAYING HOKE IN THE DARK KNIGHT.
AND I DID IT FOR THE LULZ.
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 14:20:26
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 4:54=A0pm, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 1:54=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Rob the Robber is best for you
> > His gal sue is great to screw
> > Vote for Rob the Robber
>
> And this is why he is know worldwide as "Sam the Slug"
I will only endorse Rob the Robber for this election.
I am not endorsing any other candidate.
Vote for Rob the Robber
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 14:20:03
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 4:54=A0pm, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 1:54=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Rob the Robber is best for you
> > His gal sue is great to screw
> > Vote for Rob the Robber
>
> And this is why he is know worldwide as "Sam the Slug"
Dear Frodo,
Its vile isn't it? Disgusting, and look-it! - Look at all these people
today who profess to have not 'understood' me about what a court does
in our society to resolve conflicts, and neither what is publicly
decent to suppose upon.
!
None of them either supported background checking for USCF board
members and senior officials.
But these slugs keep asking questions as if it actually meant
something to themselves or anyone else either, rather than the
patently juvenile technique of reducing other's standards to their
own, if any, buy asking then rubbishing abstractly as they can,
whatever response is offered them.
That is the size of this whole event! Projection of their own shadow
upon others is the level of the game.
But since only you and I occasionally engage these folk here at all,
putting our names to our posts, then at least it is some matter or
record that in this newsgroup there is resentment of Orcs, in all
their charming varieties.
Pity them! This is the only place left where they can do this without
immediate consequence and banning.
But pity them not overmuch since the overall nihilism which is
expressed combined with petty-ambition and resentment of anyone and
everything who do more they they have at chess, has nothing
to do with what furthers chess, a topic entirely theoretical to them,
with only token appearances.
Meanwhile, much elsewhere is afoot.
Paradoxically, I also wish Paul Truong and Susan Polgar out of USCF -
they did so much more outside it, and since they are both but children
to me, never appreciated this corporate level of blagh which has
maintained USCF all these years to its current crisis status, much
like Fide - financially broke, and without informed commentary and
useful intercourse with those who do promote chess.
Perhaps they thought it would fade like the fog before the sun? But
this is a very artificial fog indeed - as if someone had a smog-maker
going.
Well, we have, some of us, appreciated that awhile.
Cordially, Gandalf
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 13:54:22
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 1:54=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> Rob the Robber is best for you
> His gal sue is great to screw
> Vote for Rob the Robber
And this is why he is know worldwide as "Sam the Slug"
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 11:54:40
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
Rob the Robber is best for you
His gal sue is great to screw
Vote for Rob the Robber
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 09:57:09
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 10:06=A0am, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> Rob wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 9:16 am, The Historian <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Dec 30, 10:12 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
> >>> running.
> >> Well, are you? A Yes or No would seem to end this silly thread.
>
> > If Sam the Slug tells his source I will tell him if he was lied to or
> > not.
>
> Rob, tell us yes or no.
>
> Here's a possible list of EB candidates:
>Sam"The Slug" Sloan
> Rob"The Mitch" Mitchell
> Sevan Muradian
> Jack Lemoine
> Mark Nibbelin
> Donna Alarie
> Joe Lux
> David Quinn
> Brian" The Wheel Man" Lafferty
>Neil"The Historian" Brennen
> BTW, Rob the Robber has a ring to it that Sam the Slug does not.
But Sam the Slug has the correct stench to it to.
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 07:50:56
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 9:28=A0am, The Historian <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 10:19=A0am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 9:16=A0am, The Historian <[email protected]> wrote=
:
>
> > > On Dec 30, 10:12=A0am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
> > > > running.
>
> > > Well, are you? A Yes or No would seem to end this silly thread.
>
> > If Sam the Slug tells his source I will tell him if he was lied to or
> > not.
>
> Ah, so you are more interested in tracing a leak than stopping a
> rumor. Thought so!
Uncovering one also answers the other. Because with absence of a
source Sloan is proved to be a ......liar.( or honest)?
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 07:28:27
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 10:19=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 9:16=A0am, The Historian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 10:12=A0am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
> > > running.
>
> > Well, are you? A Yes or No would seem to end this silly thread.
>
> If Sam the Slug tells his source I will tell him if he was lied to or
> not.
Ah, so you are more interested in tracing a leak than stopping a
rumor. Thought so!
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 07:19:06
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 9:16=A0am, The Historian <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 10:12=A0am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
> > running.
>
> Well, are you? A Yes or No would seem to end this silly thread.
If Sam the Slug tells his source I will tell him if he was lied to or
not.
|
| | |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 16:06:52
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
Rob wrote:
> On Dec 30, 9:16 am, The Historian <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Dec 30, 10:12 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
>>> running.
>> Well, are you? A Yes or No would seem to end this silly thread.
>
> If Sam the Slug tells his source I will tell him if he was lied to or
> not.
Rob, tell us yes or no.
Here's a possible list of EB candidates:
Rob Mitchell
Sevan Muradian
Jack Lemoine
Mark Nibbelin
Donna Alarie
Joe Lux
David Quinn
BTW, Rob the Robber has a ring to it that Sam the Slug does not.
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 07:18:51
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 10:12=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 8:53=A0am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:> On Dec 29, 6=
:15=A0pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:> Having just looked at th=
is thread, could you please tell me whether or
> > > not you plan to run for the USCF EB? =A0Thanks.
>
> > =A0you can see, he has arrived, and now you know the answer.
>
> > Brian Lafferty correctly points out that Rob the Robber has yet to
> > specifically deny that he is running for the board.
>
> > Instead, Rob the Robber keeps asking, " Who told you I was running?"
>
> > Personally, I think that he would make a fine addition to the Susan
> > Polgar slate.
>
> > "Vote for Rob the Robber. He and Sue will do you too!"
>
> Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
> running.
> I asked first Sam the Slug. Notice how he fails to answer even the
> simplest question?
>
> We have yet to hear how he justifies having lewd and sexual postings
> on his website, touting how he enjoys having sex with teenagers under
> the age of 16 with his public claim to want to "do something to
> promote chess to children".
Of course, there is no such thing on my website.
This is a good example of why I should have sued you for the same
things that I sued Bill Brock for.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 07:16:58
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 10:12=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
> running.
Well, are you? A Yes or No would seem to end this silly thread.
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 07:12:26
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 30, 8:53=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 29, 6:15=A0pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:> Having jus=
t looked at this thread, could you please tell me whether or
> > not you plan to run for the USCF EB? =A0Thanks.
>
> =A0you can see, he has arrived, and now you know the answer.
>
> Brian Lafferty correctly points out that Rob the Robber has yet to
> specifically deny that he is running for the board.
>
> Instead, Rob the Robber keeps asking, " Who told you I was running?"
>
> Personally, I think that he would make a fine addition to the Susan
> Polgar slate.
>
> "Vote for Rob the Robber. He and Sue will do you too!"
Sam the Slug has yet to answer who told him the "rumor" that I was
running.
I asked first Sam the Slug. Notice how he fails to answer even the
simplest question?
We have yet to hear how he justifies having lewd and sexual postings
on his website, touting how he enjoys having sex with teenagers under
the age of 16 with his public claim to want to "do something to
promote chess to children".
|
| |
Date: 30 Dec 2008 06:53:11
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 29, 6:15=A0pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> Having just looked at this thread, could you please tell me whether or
> not you plan to run for the USCF EB? =A0Thanks.
you can see, he has arrived, and now you know the answer.
Brian Lafferty correctly points out that Rob the Robber has yet to
specifically deny that he is running for the board.
Instead, Rob the Robber keeps asking, " Who told you I was running?"
Personally, I think that he would make a fine addition to the Susan
Polgar slate.
"Vote for Rob the Robber. He and Sue will do you too!"
|
| |
Date: 29 Dec 2008 14:48:14
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 29, 11:37=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 15, 12:33=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 4:28 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
> > > USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>
> > > If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
> > > fray.
>
> > > Sam Sloan
>
> > Who is Rob the Robber???
> As you can see, he has arrived, and now you know the answer.
Look. You are simply unable to answer three questions honestly and in
an accurate manner:
1. Who told you I was running?
2. Why would I want to run?
3.Why do you continue a lie told by someone who is now calling you a
liar( Mr. 61)
|
| | |
Date: 29 Dec 2008 23:15:29
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
Having just looked at this thread, could you please tell me whether or
not you plan to run for the USCF EB? Thanks.
Rob wrote:
> On Dec 29, 11:37 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 12:33 am, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 12, 4:28 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
>>>> USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>>>> If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
>>>> fray.
>>>> Sam Sloan
>>> Who is Rob the Robber???
>
>
>
>> As you can see, he has arrived, and now you know the answer.
>
> Look. You are simply unable to answer three questions honestly and in
> an accurate manner:
>
> 1. Who told you I was running?
> 2. Why would I want to run?
> 3.Why do you continue a lie told by someone who is now calling you a
> liar( Mr. 61)
|
| |
Date: 29 Dec 2008 09:37:21
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 15, 12:33=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 12, 4:28 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
> > USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>
> > If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
> > fray.
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> Who is Rob the Robber???
As you can see, he has arrived, and now you know the answer.
|
| |
Date: 29 Dec 2008 07:13:04
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 29, 5:57=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 28, 3:44=A0pm, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 14, 11:33=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 12, 4:28 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for th=
e
> > > > USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>
> > > > If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
> > > > fray.
>
> > > > Sam Sloan
> > > Who is Rob the Robber???
>
> > A figment of Samantha Sloans vivid imagination.
>
> Since you keep posting to this thread, that must mean that you really
> are running.
Really? Who told you? Or is this just another fanciful drug induced
acid trip on your part?
> There is no such person as Samantha Sloan, but you already knew that.
We know no such thing. Prove there is no Samantha Sloan, Samantha.
> Others include overwriting and thereby deleting
> title threads
Something you have done yourself as has anyone who wishes to accuratly
describe a thread drift, but go on Samantha.
>of threads others started that you do not happen to like
> and sending unwanted videos into my private email group after you have
> been banned.
This is a lie. It never happened and I have no idea why you want to
drag anyone back into the abyss you call yahoo group. LOL Still
spamming your own board and answering yourself over there?
>
>
> is because of your attempt to swindle that fledgling entrepreneur Ed
> Trice out of $35,000 by claiming that you had made a deal with Bobby
> Fischer to play in a chess match.
I will not discuss this here. It is a lie. That is all I will say
about it.
> Sam Sloan
There is no "Rob the Robber" But their is a Samantha Sloan. after
undergoing intensive hormone therapy she now lives in the Ishi-stan
region of NYC.
The Mitch
|
| |
Date: 29 Dec 2008 03:57:52
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 28, 3:44=A0pm, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 14, 11:33=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 4:28 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
> > > USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>
> > > If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
> > > fray.
>
> > > Sam Sloan
> > Who is Rob the Robber???
>
> A figment of Samantha Sloans vivid imagination.
Since you keep posting to this thread, that must mean that you really
are running.
There is no such person as Samantha Sloan, but you already knew that.
That is one of the kinds of things you do that preserve your nickname
of "Rob the Robber". Others include overwriting and thereby deleting
title threads of threads others started that you do not happen to like
and sending unwanted videos into my private email group after you have
been banned.
But the original reason that you started being called "Rob the Robber"
is because of your attempt to swindle that fledgling entrepreneur Ed
Trice out of $35,000 by claiming that you had made a deal with Bobby
Fischer to play in a chess match.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 28 Dec 2008 12:44:02
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 14, 11:33=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 12, 4:28 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
> > USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>
> > If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
> > fray.
>
> > Sam Sloan
> Who is Rob the Robber???
A figment of Samantha Sloans vivid imagination.
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 16:50:47
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 6:25=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 26, 6:28=A0pm, help bot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 5:11=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > > =A0 We, the USCF membership, want someone
> > > > who will not be looking for all-expenses-paid
> > > > "junkets" or other perks, like free paper and
> > > > pencils, just to perform very simple tasks.
> > > You ain't no farmer! The trick of mowing is to find the route around
> > > your area which requires the minimum of travel - its actually quite
> > > complicated mechanically, and evolved from plowing... [but I digress]
>
> > =A0 At one point, right in the middle of a lecture on
> > the pathetic history of mankind, we were told how
> > clever folk managed to improve the design of the
> > ox or horse drawn plow, such as to no longer
> > choke the animal... (at which point I suggested
> > we hang the chap who had invented the prior
> > design-- the one which did choke the poor
> > creatures, while they labored; unfortunately, he
> > was already dead).
>
> I hope you do not refer to my own lecture here on the self same
> subject. I merely mentioned that in 500 years the Anglo Saxons didn't
> invent the mulboard - the bit that turns the furrow over, so for 500
> years these 'clod-hoppers' followed the plow with girt-great mallets,
> and broke up the clumps, &c.
>
> Besides, both horses and oxen were smaller then.
>
> > > > =A0 Learn from those who have gone before: it is
> > > > virtually impossible to get anything done with
> > > > just a single vote on the board. =A0 This we have
> > > > been told by such reliables as Mr. Sloan, and
> > > > Mr. Alburt and if I am not mistaken, even the
> > > > two-person team of SP and PT.
> > > We will kick them all 'upstairs', and they can do whatever they do
> > > from there. But sakes! Can't a man mow the lawn without chess
> > > government meddling with it? Sign of the times if you ask me.
>
> > =A0 What about installing one of those lawn-mowing
> > robots?
>
> A lawn-bot?
>
> > =A0 Set it, and forget it. =A0 Okay-- call me
> > biased; I just happen to think that we bots are
> > better than most humans at many things.
>
> Hmm - these things are okay until they go wrong and need rebooting.
> Any USCF lawn-bot is going to get itself sued for mowing the entire
> town, flower beds and all, or forever getting mired in the local
> swamp. That's why we humans should maintain control of things,
> especially the aforesaid Rob Mitchell.
>
> > > > If such be the case, why bother running? =A0 Is the idea to
> > > > serve as toady to the BG clan?
> > > I had simpler idea - that Rob Mitchell takes over from all clans, no
> > > matter how toady they want - and cut the grass. Why would anyone ever
> > > encourage a politician to do anything new, when they never, ever
> > > finish anything they already started? Randy Bauer reads here, and he
> > > could probably tell you what other politicians never completed. Its
> > > all impulse, you see? Impulse to power which tragically does not
> > > translate to ability to do squat.
>
> > =A0 =A0No, no, no! =A0 A board member should not
> > be the lawn mower man; there are a number
> > of potential conflicts of interest, you see.
>
> I do? S'far as I care doesn't matter which board member does it, old
> ones or new ones - its the doing it which is important. Given that no
> board member has ever done what they said they would, I think this is
> an important point - not some abstraction about all board members.
>
> > > > =A0 Is it the fame, or the glory? =A0 Certainly, you do
> > > > not imagine single-handedly tackling BG and his
> > > > whole regime... .
> > > Its ben done. All you gotta do is outsource USCF's Media, Ratings and
> > > Event Management - and guarantee not to lose more than they current
> > > achieve by doing this themselves, and its logically persuasive to
> > > voters, and Ring Wraiths alike.
>
> > =A0 Hmm... using logic to sway voters? =A0 Never
> > been done, but it /might/ work.
>
> I have a way with wurds.
>
> or, to be old-fashioned...
>
> Leave it to Beaver.
>
> > =A0 Generally speaking, the mass media seems
> > to strongly favor the use of a wide variety of
> > "cheap tricks" to manipulate-- er, I mean to
> > persuade the voters.
>
> To cut the grass? Naturally, on occasions, celebrities could do it;
> visiting GMs and such and be photographed at 'chipping-in', for Chess
> Junior, the national Chess Youth Magazine. But do GMs visit ChessHut?
> Possibly as you suggest they could be photographed in a studio with a
> clever background of HQ and its surrounding swamp.
>
> > > BTW: you need a job?
>
> > =A0 =A0I have a lawn mower, but it's much too far to
> > drive; from here to Tennessee via side-roads
> > on my John Deere would take well over two
> > hours, even in top gear! =A0 No, no-- give it to Mr.
> > Mitchell. =A0 I was just kidding around. =A0 I don't
> > care if I'm a master gardener, and he doesn't
> > know crabgrass from red seedum.
>
> Frankly I have worried about that too. Maybe the cheapest thing to do
> would be to put down some of that fabric stuff and make a gravel
> garden with inspiring sculptures of Bobby Fischer? One-time cost and
> its all over.
>
> > > Its hard to think of what would happen after the
> > > Rule-of-3 takes hold, but cutting the grass is one thing I thought of=
,
> > > also finding out while you are there what's in the archive.
>
> > =A0 No pictures, that's for sure; Mr Parr claims
> > that Edward Winter made off with them (just
> > after EW tried to destroy the world, joined the
> > Nazi party, and converted to that human-
> > sacrifice Aztec sect).
>
> Converted from what? Jacobins?
>
> & Don't mention Andeans! Its a tricky subject and you can be misquoted
> or taken out of context by net-dweebs who then pretend you were
> writing about Hitler, eg.
>
> > > You think of anything else? If so let's make a plank of it and get yo=
u
> > > some member's money. But I can't think of nuthin else at the moment.
>
> > =A0 Yes, yes-- send me money, by all means.
> > I will invest it, just like I did my own money,
> > and one day you too will get to meet my
> > brilliant investment advisor, Mr. Madoff... .
>
> All my money is in treasuries, matey and a spot o' gold.
>
> Cordially, lawn-bot
>
> or
>
> can they get them to do those nice gravel patterns yet? Anyway, can
> you cite one of these lawn-bots saying it never went wrong and
> ravished the irises? eh?
>
> > =A0 -- help bot
I would prefer to plant what small unpaved portion of yard their is
with white clover. It thrives in most weather, goes not require mowing
and feed many of natures small furries!. In a pinch, It can be served
as a salad in the cafateria!
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 16:25:34
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 6:28=A0pm, help bot <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 26, 5:11=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > =A0 We, the USCF membership, want someone
> > > who will not be looking for all-expenses-paid
> > > "junkets" or other perks, like free paper and
> > > pencils, just to perform very simple tasks.
> > You ain't no farmer! The trick of mowing is to find the route around
> > your area which requires the minimum of travel - its actually quite
> > complicated mechanically, and evolved from plowing... [but I digress]
>
> =A0 At one point, right in the middle of a lecture on
> the pathetic history of mankind, we were told how
> clever folk managed to improve the design of the
> ox or horse drawn plow, such as to no longer
> choke the animal... (at which point I suggested
> we hang the chap who had invented the prior
> design-- the one which did choke the poor
> creatures, while they labored; unfortunately, he
> was already dead).
I hope you do not refer to my own lecture here on the self same
subject. I merely mentioned that in 500 years the Anglo Saxons didn't
invent the mulboard - the bit that turns the furrow over, so for 500
years these 'clod-hoppers' followed the plow with girt-great mallets,
and broke up the clumps, &c.
Besides, both horses and oxen were smaller then.
> > > =A0 Learn from those who have gone before: it is
> > > virtually impossible to get anything done with
> > > just a single vote on the board. =A0 This we have
> > > been told by such reliables as Mr. Sloan, and
> > > Mr. Alburt and if I am not mistaken, even the
> > > two-person team of SP and PT.
> > We will kick them all 'upstairs', and they can do whatever they do
> > from there. But sakes! Can't a man mow the lawn without chess
> > government meddling with it? Sign of the times if you ask me.
>
> =A0 What about installing one of those lawn-mowing
> robots?
A lawn-bot?
> =A0 Set it, and forget it. =A0 Okay-- call me
> biased; I just happen to think that we bots are
> better than most humans at many things.
Hmm - these things are okay until they go wrong and need rebooting.
Any USCF lawn-bot is going to get itself sued for mowing the entire
town, flower beds and all, or forever getting mired in the local
swamp. That's why we humans should maintain control of things,
especially the aforesaid Rob Mitchell.
> > > If such be the case, why bother running? =A0 Is the idea to
> > > serve as toady to the BG clan?
> > I had simpler idea - that Rob Mitchell takes over from all clans, no
> > matter how toady they want - and cut the grass. Why would anyone ever
> > encourage a politician to do anything new, when they never, ever
> > finish anything they already started? Randy Bauer reads here, and he
> > could probably tell you what other politicians never completed. Its
> > all impulse, you see? Impulse to power which tragically does not
> > translate to ability to do squat.
>
> =A0 =A0No, no, no! =A0 A board member should not
> be the lawn mower man; there are a number
> of potential conflicts of interest, you see.
I do? S'far as I care doesn't matter which board member does it, old
ones or new ones - its the doing it which is important. Given that no
board member has ever done what they said they would, I think this is
an important point - not some abstraction about all board members.
> > > =A0 Is it the fame, or the glory? =A0 Certainly, you do
> > > not imagine single-handedly tackling BG and his
> > > whole regime... .
> > Its ben done. All you gotta do is outsource USCF's Media, Ratings and
> > Event Management - and guarantee not to lose more than they current
> > achieve by doing this themselves, and its logically persuasive to
> > voters, and Ring Wraiths alike.
>
> =A0 Hmm... using logic to sway voters? =A0 Never
> been done, but it /might/ work.
I have a way with wurds.
or, to be old-fashioned...
Leave it to Beaver.
> =A0 Generally speaking, the mass media seems
> to strongly favor the use of a wide variety of
> "cheap tricks" to manipulate-- er, I mean to
> persuade the voters.
To cut the grass? Naturally, on occasions, celebrities could do it;
visiting GMs and such and be photographed at 'chipping-in', for Chess
Junior, the national Chess Youth Magazine. But do GMs visit ChessHut?
Possibly as you suggest they could be photographed in a studio with a
clever background of HQ and its surrounding swamp.
> > BTW: you need a job?
>
> =A0 =A0I have a lawn mower, but it's much too far to
> drive; from here to Tennessee via side-roads
> on my John Deere would take well over two
> hours, even in top gear! =A0 No, no-- give it to Mr.
> Mitchell. =A0 I was just kidding around. =A0 I don't
> care if I'm a master gardener, and he doesn't
> know crabgrass from red seedum.
Frankly I have worried about that too. Maybe the cheapest thing to do
would be to put down some of that fabric stuff and make a gravel
garden with inspiring sculptures of Bobby Fischer? One-time cost and
its all over.
> > Its hard to think of what would happen after the
> > Rule-of-3 takes hold, but cutting the grass is one thing I thought of,
> > also finding out while you are there what's in the archive.
>
> =A0 No pictures, that's for sure; Mr Parr claims
> that Edward Winter made off with them (just
> after EW tried to destroy the world, joined the
> Nazi party, and converted to that human-
> sacrifice Aztec sect).
Converted from what? Jacobins?
& Don't mention Andeans! Its a tricky subject and you can be misquoted
or taken out of context by net-dweebs who then pretend you were
writing about Hitler, eg.
> > You think of anything else? If so let's make a plank of it and get you
> > some member's money. But I can't think of nuthin else at the moment.
>
> =A0 Yes, yes-- send me money, by all means.
> I will invest it, just like I did my own money,
> and one day you too will get to meet my
> brilliant investment advisor, Mr. Madoff... .
All my money is in treasuries, matey and a spot o' gold.
Cordially, lawn-bot
or
can they get them to do those nice gravel patterns yet? Anyway, can
you cite one of these lawn-bots saying it never went wrong and
ravished the irises? eh?
> =A0 -- help bot
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 15:28:38
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 5:11=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> > =A0 We, the USCF membership, want someone
> > who will not be looking for all-expenses-paid
> > "junkets" or other perks, like free paper and
> > pencils, just to perform very simple tasks.
> You ain't no farmer! The trick of mowing is to find the route around
> your area which requires the minimum of travel - its actually quite
> complicated mechanically, and evolved from plowing... [but I digress]
At one point, right in the middle of a lecture on
the pathetic history of mankind, we were told how
clever folk managed to improve the design of the
ox or horse drawn plow, such as to no longer
choke the animal... (at which point I suggested
we hang the chap who had invented the prior
design-- the one which did choke the poor
creatures, while they labored; unfortunately, he
was already dead).
> > =A0 Learn from those who have gone before: it is
> > virtually impossible to get anything done with
> > just a single vote on the board. =A0 This we have
> > been told by such reliables as Mr. Sloan, and
> > Mr. Alburt and if I am not mistaken, even the
> > two-person team of SP and PT.
> We will kick them all 'upstairs', and they can do whatever they do
> from there. But sakes! Can't a man mow the lawn without chess
> government meddling with it? Sign of the times if you ask me.
What about installing one of those lawn-mowing
robots? Set it, and forget it. Okay-- call me
biased; I just happen to think that we bots are
better than most humans at many things.
> > If such be the case, why bother running? =A0 Is the idea to
> > serve as toady to the BG clan?
> I had simpler idea - that Rob Mitchell takes over from all clans, no
> matter how toady they want - and cut the grass. Why would anyone ever
> encourage a politician to do anything new, when they never, ever
> finish anything they already started? Randy Bauer reads here, and he
> could probably tell you what other politicians never completed. Its
> all impulse, you see? Impulse to power which tragically does not
> translate to ability to do squat.
No, no, no! A board member should not
be the lawn mower man; there are a number
of potential conflicts of interest, you see.
> > =A0 Is it the fame, or the glory? =A0 Certainly, you do
> > not imagine single-handedly tackling BG and his
> > whole regime... .
> Its ben done. All you gotta do is outsource USCF's Media, Ratings and
> Event Management - and guarantee not to lose more than they current
> achieve by doing this themselves, and its logically persuasive to
> voters, and Ring Wraiths alike.
Hmm... using logic to sway voters? Never
been done, but it /might/ work.
Generally speaking, the mass media seems
to strongly favor the use of a wide variety of
"cheap tricks" to manipulate-- er, I mean to
persuade the voters.
> BTW: you need a job?
I have a lawn mower, but it's much too far to
drive; from here to Tennessee via side-roads
on my John Deere would take well over two
hours, even in top gear! No, no-- give it to Mr.
Mitchell. I was just kidding around. I don't
care if I'm a master gardener, and he doesn't
know crabgrass from red seedum.
> Its hard to think of what would happen after the
> Rule-of-3 takes hold, but cutting the grass is one thing I thought of,
> also finding out while you are there what's in the archive.
No pictures, that's for sure; Mr Parr claims
that Edward Winter made off with them (just
after EW tried to destroy the world, joined the
Nazi party, and converted to that human-
sacrifice Aztec sect).
> You think of anything else? If so let's make a plank of it and get you
> some member's money. But I can't think of nuthin else at the moment.
Yes, yes-- send me money, by all means.
I will invest it, just like I did my own money,
and one day you too will get to meet my
brilliant investment advisor, Mr. Madoff... .
-- help bot
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 14:11:22
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 4:21=A0pm, help bot <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 26, 8:32=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Therefore USCF's expenses are considerably reduced to (a) the cost of
> > Rob Mitchell's gas to get there
>
> =A0 Strike one: Mr. Mitchell is apparently not green
> enough; he burns up gasoline just to get to HQ;
Sure nuff; its greener to walk, but after all, he will be a board
member, or lawnmower man, and can use his own car if he wants
> > (b) gas for the lawn mower
>
> =A0 Strike two: Mr. Mitchell even burns gasoline in
> his smoke-sputtering lawn mower;
Since I live in town I have one of them no-noise push mowers - but is
he expected to run his ride-on on? Corn?
> > (c) a legal pad and 2 sharp pencils to record anything found in the arc=
hive.
>
> =A0 Strike three: Mr. Mitchell cannot even seem to
> afford to provide scrap paper on which to record
> his thoughts, nor remember them otherwise.
Like you and I are any better! What if he was provided one pencil by
USCF, and supplied the back-up himself? As for legal pads, I admit
that was a poor choice of words on my part given recent history - but
anything will do - like stapled together Christmas wrapping - which
the rest of us just chucked into the trash. That would be green -
unfortunately you prob need one of them grease pencils to write on the
back. I admit my ignorance of this subject - but a 75cent experiment
may be warranted.
> =A0 We, the USCF membership, want someone
> who will not be looking for all-expenses-paid
> "junkets" or other perks, like free paper and
> pencils, just to perform very simple tasks.
You ain't no farmer! The trick of mowing is to find the route around
your area which requires the minimum of travel - its actually quite
complicated mechanically, and evolved from plowing... [but I digress]
> > I suppose he could also do tours =A0"... and this is where the Presiden=
t
> > used to sit and make interesting decisions..." =A0"...and this is where
> > Bill Hal sat when he was actually here..." "... and from this very
> > seat Board Member A sued Board Member B for 39 Quadrillion dollars...
> > "
>
> > Vote for Mitchell and the Rule-of-3 =A0!!
>
> =A0 Learn from those who have gone before: it is
> virtually impossible to get anything done with
> just a single vote on the board. =A0 This we have
> been told by such reliables as Mr. Sloan, and
> Mr. Alburt and if I am not mistaken, even the
> two-person team of SP and PT.
We will kick them all 'upstairs', and they can do whatever they do
from there. But sakes! Can't a man mow the lawn without chess
government meddling with it? Sign of the times if you ask me.
> =A0 If such be
> the case, why bother running? =A0 Is the idea to
> serve as toady to the BG clan?
I had simpler idea - that Rob Mitchell takes over from all clans, no
matter how toady they want - and cut the grass. Why would anyone ever
encourage a politician to do anything new, when they never, ever
finish anything they already started? Randy Bauer reads here, and he
could probably tell you what other politicians never completed. Its
all impulse, you see? Impulse to power which tragically does not
translate to ability to do squat.
> =A0 Or to just be
> impotent, like Mr. Sloan was?
A psychological comment that I will defer my own psychological
response thereunto until another occasion. I have December 30th in
mind.
> =A0 Is it the fame,
> or the glory? =A0 Certainly, you do not imagine
> single-handedly tackling BG and his whole
> regime... .
Its ben done. All you gotta do is outsource USCF's Media, Ratings and
Event Management - and guarantee not to lose more than they current
achieve by doing this themselves, and its logically persuasive to
voters, and Ring Wraiths alike.
BTW: you need a job? Its hard to think of what would happen after the
Rule-of-3 takes hold, but cutting the grass is one thing I thought of,
also finding out while you are there what's in the archive.
You think of anything else? If so let's make a plank of it and get you
some member's money. But I can't think of nuthin else at the moment.
Good luck with your thinking.
Phil Innes
Chair,
Rule-of-3 advisory committee
> =A0 -- help bot
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 13:26:33
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 8:51=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> The benefits of contracting out these services can save thousands of
> dollars in workers comp and insurance costs. The building itself could
> become a permanent tournament facility or could be leased to the KCF
There you have it: Mr. Mitchell wants to turn
the USCF headquarters into a fried chicken
drive-thru restaurant. If he succeeds, I will be
forced to sell every share I own of YUM brands,
for everything the USCF touches, it turns to
dust (this brings us right back to the subject of
vampires and how they may be permanently
extinguished).
-- help bot
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 13:21:25
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 8:32=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> Therefore USCF's expenses are considerably reduced to (a) the cost of
> Rob Mitchell's gas to get there
Strike one: Mr. Mitchell is apparently not green
enough; he burns up gasoline just to get to HQ;
> (b) gas for the lawn mower
Strike two: Mr. Mitchell even burns gasoline in
his smoke-sputtering lawn mower;
> (c) a legal pad and 2 sharp pencils to record anything found in the archi=
ve.
Strike three: Mr. Mitchell cannot even seem to
afford to provide scrap paper on which to record
his thoughts, nor remember them otherwise.
We, the USCF membership, want someone
who will not be looking for all-expenses-paid
"junkets" or other perks, like free paper and
pencils, just to perform very simple tasks.
> I suppose he could also do tours =A0"... and this is where the President
> used to sit and make interesting decisions..." =A0"...and this is where
> Bill Hal sat when he was actually here..." "... and from this very
> seat Board Member A sued Board Member B for 39 Quadrillion dollars...
> "
>
> Vote for Mitchell and the Rule-of-3 =A0!!
Learn from those who have gone before: it is
virtually impossible to get anything done with
just a single vote on the board. This we have
been told by such reliables as Mr. Sloan, and
Mr. Alburt and if I am not mistaken, even the
two-person team of SP and PT. If such be
the case, why bother running? Is the idea to
serve as toady to the BG clan? Or to just be
impotent, like Mr. Sloan was? Is it the fame,
or the glory? Certainly, you do not imagine
single-handedly tackling BG and his whole
regime... .
-- help bot
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 05:51:01
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 7:32=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 26, 8:00=A0am, The Historian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 26, 7:17=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > 1) Chessville is subcontacted instead of CL ]live and dead version]
>
> > I agree Chessvile should be subcontacted, to use P Innes' word. It's a
> > sub-rate contact if ever I saw one. And the Alekhine's Parrot column
> > is pretty brain-dead.
>
> 60,000 readers a month, including ace-sleuth Brennan who keeps close
> tabs on things, can't all be wrong.
>
> The trouble is, if CL goes away and Chessville who provide twice as
> much coverage as well as being a weekly instead of monthly, and
> already has bi-lingual news-services, huge amount of downloads, and
> friends around the word [our Christams card wnet to contributors in
> about 20 countries] - and and which incidentally has 2 shrinks and 3
> lawyers - [the recommended proportions] ...
>
> and CXR do the national ratings in living color & cheaper too, in fact
> the information they supply is not just a number, but all sorts of
> data on scores with white and black, and scores against various
> strength of opponents - A rating service for the C21st!
>
> then SPICE take-over event management - didn't the first 4 months of
> this FY lose $50,000?
>
> - what will there be left to do back at ChessHut HQ in Crossville?
>
> Now, if we elect Rob Mitchell, he can hike up there every couple of
> weeks and mow the lawn until someone thinks of what to do with the
> building.
>
> Other board members can hold virtual discussions on this proven
> business basis for successful boards: they can do nothing until they
> agree on Job 1 - and if they do that, they can do nothing else until
> Job 1 is completed. Quite possibly if they started in June, they might
> get to Job 2 in April [or they might not]. And as for Job 3... you're
> dreaming!
>
> Anyway, I suppose Rob could also go inside the building just to make
> sure the hinges on the doors don't need oiling - in case anyone can
> think of a reason to go inside. Though, I can't immediately think of
> any myself...
>
> It would be more profitable to enter the storage facility where the
> archive is 'maintained' and rip through the tons of material shipped
> there from NY searching for a signed Fischer game-score, and whatever
> else seems valuable. There must be something in that pile.
>
> Therefore USCF's expenses are considerably reduced to (a) the cost of
> Rob Mitchell's gas to get there (b) gas for the lawn mower (c) a legal
> pad and 2 sharp pencils to record anything found in the archive.
>
> I suppose he could also do tours =A0"... and this is where the President
> used to sit and make interesting decisions..." =A0"...and this is where
> Bill Hal sat when he was actually here..." "... and from this very
> seat Board Member A sued Board Member B for 39 Quadrillion dollars...
> "
>
> Vote for Mitchell and the Rule-of-3 =A0!!
>
> Phil Innes
> Vermont
The benefits of contracting out these services can save thousands of
dollars in workers comp and insurance costs. The building itself could
become a permanent tournament facility or could be leased to the KCF.
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 05:32:19
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 8:00=A0am, The Historian <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 26, 7:17=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > 1) Chessville is subcontacted instead of CL ]live and dead version]
>
> I agree Chessvile should be subcontacted, to use P Innes' word. It's a
> sub-rate contact if ever I saw one. And the Alekhine's Parrot column
> is pretty brain-dead.
60,000 readers a month, including ace-sleuth Brennan who keeps close
tabs on things, can't all be wrong.
The trouble is, if CL goes away and Chessville who provide twice as
much coverage as well as being a weekly instead of monthly, and
already has bi-lingual news-services, huge amount of downloads, and
friends around the word [our Christams card wnet to contributors in
about 20 countries] - and and which incidentally has 2 shrinks and 3
lawyers - [the recommended proportions] ...
and CXR do the national ratings in living color & cheaper too, in fact
the information they supply is not just a number, but all sorts of
data on scores with white and black, and scores against various
strength of opponents - A rating service for the C21st!
then SPICE take-over event management - didn't the first 4 months of
this FY lose $50,000?
- what will there be left to do back at ChessHut HQ in Crossville?
Now, if we elect Rob Mitchell, he can hike up there every couple of
weeks and mow the lawn until someone thinks of what to do with the
building.
Other board members can hold virtual discussions on this proven
business basis for successful boards: they can do nothing until they
agree on Job 1 - and if they do that, they can do nothing else until
Job 1 is completed. Quite possibly if they started in June, they might
get to Job 2 in April [or they might not]. And as for Job 3... you're
dreaming!
Anyway, I suppose Rob could also go inside the building just to make
sure the hinges on the doors don't need oiling - in case anyone can
think of a reason to go inside. Though, I can't immediately think of
any myself...
It would be more profitable to enter the storage facility where the
archive is 'maintained' and rip through the tons of material shipped
there from NY searching for a signed Fischer game-score, and whatever
else seems valuable. There must be something in that pile.
Therefore USCF's expenses are considerably reduced to (a) the cost of
Rob Mitchell's gas to get there (b) gas for the lawn mower (c) a legal
pad and 2 sharp pencils to record anything found in the archive.
I suppose he could also do tours "... and this is where the President
used to sit and make interesting decisions..." "...and this is where
Bill Hal sat when he was actually here..." "... and from this very
seat Board Member A sued Board Member B for 39 Quadrillion dollars...
"
Vote for Mitchell and the Rule-of-3 !!
Phil Innes
Vermont
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 05:00:24
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 7:17=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> 1) Chessville is subcontacted instead of CL ]live and dead version]
I agree Chessvile should be subcontacted, to use P Innes' word. It's a
sub-rate contact if ever I saw one. And the Alekhine's Parrot column
is pretty brain-dead.
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 04:33:08
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 7:14=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> Who is everybody? =A0Outside of yourself and your multiple posting
> personas, who?
> Who have you been talking with that has suggested I am running?
>
> Rob "Which Mitch"
By the way, I do not have multiple posting personalities.
I always post as me, Sam Sloan.
You are thinking of your friend, the Fake Sam Sloan.
The Real Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 04:17:16
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
> Robs from the Rich and
> Gives to the Poor", or something like that.
>
> Sam Sloan
Sounds like what McCain tried to tie onto Obama. Distribute the
wealth! Maybe there will be a wholesale redistribution of rating
points?
As long as we are talking seriously, 3 things need to happen 'as
everyone says'
1) Chessville is subcontacted instead of CL ]live and dead version]
2) CXR is subcontracted instead of USCFs in-house group
3) SPICE is subcontracted for event management.
Having achieved all this, all that's left for USCF to do is, um...
Go ahead - Make My Tea! Phil Innes
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 04:14:40
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 26, 12:28=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 25, 4:16=A0pm, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 5:00=A0pm, Mike Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:39:50 -0800 (PST), [email protected] wrote:
> > > >"Decency is important to the American People" or actually much bette=
r:
>
> > > >"Decent, Legal, Honest and Truthful."
>
> > > IfRobplans to run on the Polgar Slate, there is one big is-sue:
>
> > > How can we expect faithful Federation stewardship from one allied to
> > > an EB member currently making a mockery of her own stewardship
> > > obligation by trying to destroy the Federation financially?
>
> > > We expect "honest and truthful" explanations from such a candidate.
> > > And they better be good.
>
> > Well,
> > This is quite a bunch of pickles.
> > Sloan lies whole cloth about me and then claims take a moniker the
> > he,himself is the only user of is "everyone".
> > I wonder where Mrs. Sloans information comes from? Samantha either has
> > a "deep throat" source inside the uscf or is indeed just a "deep
> > throater" herself?
> > Merry Christmas Samantha.
>
> > Rob "Which Mitch"
>
> Sorry, but I am afraid that your moniker, "Rob the Robber", is pretty
> much universally accepted in these parts. Everybody calls you that
> nowadays. The name seems to fit so well.
>
> So, in your coming campaign for election, you might as well take
> advantage of this: "Vote for Rob the Robber. Robs from the Rich and
> Gives to the Poor", or something like that.
>
> Sam Sloan
Who is everybody? Outside of yourself and your multiple posting
personas, who?
Who have you been talking with that has suggested I am running?
Rob "Which Mitch"
|
| |
Date: 25 Dec 2008 22:28:26
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 25, 4:16=A0pm, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 15, 5:00=A0pm, Mike Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:39:50 -0800 (PST), [email protected] wrote:
> > >"Decency is important to the American People" or actually much better:
>
> > >"Decent, Legal, Honest and Truthful."
>
> > IfRobplans to run on the Polgar Slate, there is one big is-sue:
>
> > How can we expect faithful Federation stewardship from one allied to
> > an EB member currently making a mockery of her own stewardship
> > obligation by trying to destroy the Federation financially?
>
> > We expect "honest and truthful" explanations from such a candidate.
> > And they better be good.
>
> Well,
> This is quite a bunch of pickles.
> Sloan lies whole cloth about me and then claims take a moniker the
> he,himself is the only user of is "everyone".
> I wonder where Mrs. Sloans information comes from? Samantha either has
> a "deep throat" source inside the uscf or is indeed just a "deep
> throater" herself?
> Merry Christmas Samantha.
>
> Rob "Which Mitch"
Sorry, but I am afraid that your moniker, "Rob the Robber", is pretty
much universally accepted in these parts. Everybody calls you that
nowadays. The name seems to fit so well.
So, in your coming campaign for election, you might as well take
advantage of this: "Vote for Rob the Robber. Robs from the Rich and
Gives to the Poor", or something like that.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 25 Dec 2008 13:16:49
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 15, 5:00=A0pm, Mike Murray <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:39:50 -0800 (PST), [email protected] wrote:
> >"Decency is important to the American People" or actually much better:
>
> >"Decent, Legal, Honest and Truthful."
>
> IfRobplans to run on the Polgar Slate, there is one big is-sue:
>
> How can we expect faithful Federation stewardship from one allied to
> an EB member currently making a mockery of her own stewardship
> obligation by trying to destroy the Federation financially?
>
> We expect "honest and truthful" explanations from such a candidate.
> And they better be good.
Well,
This is quite a bunch of pickles.
Sloan lies whole cloth about me and then claims take a moniker the
he,himself is the only user of is "everyone".
I wonder where Mrs. Sloans information comes from? Samantha either has
a "deep throat" source inside the uscf or is indeed just a "deep
throater" herself?
Merry Christmas Samantha.
Rob "Which Mitch"
|
| |
Date: 16 Dec 2008 05:38:09
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 15, 7:51=A0pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hey, BB! =A0What has happened to chessdiscussion.com? As chief Trolgar
> flack, you must have an inside scoop to share with us. =A0;-)
I second! Come on P Innes, spill your guts.
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2008 13:38:45
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
The Historian wrote:
> On Dec 15, 7:51 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hey, BB! What has happened to chessdiscussion.com? As chief Trolgar
>> flack, you must have an inside scoop to share with us. ;-)
>
> I second! Come on P Innes, spill your guts.
>
Is someone destroying evidence?
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Dec 2008 18:25:07
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
B. Lafferty wrote:
> The Historian wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 7:51 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey, BB! What has happened to chessdiscussion.com? As chief Trolgar
>>> flack, you must have an inside scoop to share with us. ;-)
>>
>> I second! Come on P Innes, spill your guts.
>>
> Is someone destroying evidence?
The question should be stated as, who might be engaging in Obstruction
of Justice due to destruction of evidence.
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 16:30:41
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 15, 4:39=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 15, 10:35=A0am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > We should try to think of some good campaign slogans, to help Rob the
> > Robber on his way to election victory.
>
> "I play chess against anyone who shows up?"
>
> > Here is my first feeble attempt. I am sure that readers of this group
> > can think of something better.
>
> > "Rob the Robber, Who? Who? Who?
> > "Who will he Rob Next, You? You? You?"
>
> Sam Sloan choses to believe a certain alt-chess type in order to
> suggest 'Robber'. Some say the alt-chess type is the author of My 61
> Games.
It is true that Rob got his moniker "The Robber" from a botched deal
with Ed Trice, when they both accused the other one of trying to
swindle each other out of $35,000 for promoting a $14 million dollar
Gothic Chess Match that Bobby Fischer was supposedly going to play.
However, the name "The Robber" has stuck and has become widely
accepted and will probably remain with him for the rest of his life
because of other things he did, such as changing or overwriting the
titles to threads in this group to prevent others from finding or
reading them, for flooding my private email group fide-chess with
unwanted videos when he had been suspended and later banned from my
group, for accusing me and others of being a "coward" for refusing to
play him when he is an 800 strength chess player and nobody wants to
waste time playing with beginners, and so on.
Rob "The Robber" first got involved with chess in 2005 when the USCF
moved to Tennessee and, since he lives in Nashville, he applied for
the job of Scholastic Director.
He reached the inteview stag, but he was turned down for that
position.
He then applied for the job of Executive Director.
This time, he did not reach the interview stage. Since his background
is that he is an insurance salesman, he seemed to have no qualficatins
for the job.
It was then that he went on a rampage, bombarding all the chess
discussion groups with a lot of nonsense, so he became known as "Rob
the Robber".
If will be really funny if he runs for USCF Executive Board, and even
funnier if he wins.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 13:39:50
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 15, 10:35=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> We should try to think of some good campaign slogans, to help Rob the
> Robber on his way to election victory.
"I play chess against anyone who shows up?"
> Here is my first feeble attempt. I am sure that readers of this group
> can think of something better.
>
> "Rob the Robber, Who? Who? Who?
> "Who will he Rob Next, You? You? You?"
Sam Sloan choses to believe a certain alt-chess type in order to
suggest 'Robber'. Some say the alt-chess type is the author of My 61
Games.
At least Sam Sloan is a believer - I convinced him once that Botvinnik
was Cornish, and he also believed the April Fool's joke about SP, the
chess castle, the nuns, the whole 9 yards - all it lacked was the
perpetual motion and a modest canal.
> We should also remember to give Susan Polgar her 40th birthday party,
> as it is coming soon.
I bought her a book, but its too good to send unread, so maybe I'll
delay awhile?
As for Rob Mitchell I can suggest a few slogans, and maybe Sam Sloan
would agree with them? He is after all very brave with his opinions
about others - can he be as brave himself?
"I am not afraid to take a high-school level background check."
"Anyone having to do with our children should be / required / to take
a high school level background check."
That's just off the top, but we could even go for:
"Decency is important to the American People" or actually much better:
"Decent, Legal, Honest and Truthful."
I wonder if its time for those values - and I further wonder if there
could possibly be any flak about a decent person running under that
banner. Personally, I think chess folks could really go for it,
especially after the past two years.
If for any reason Sam Sloan likes these ideas, then he might vote for
Rob Mitchell himself, or state his objections to why these qualities
seem reprehensible to such as his own intelligence.
Phil Innes
The Frozen Republic of Vermont
> Sam Sloan
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2008 00:51:16
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
[email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 15, 10:35 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We should try to think of some good campaign slogans, to help Rob the
>> Robber on his way to election victory.
>
> "I play chess against anyone who shows up?"
>
>> Here is my first feeble attempt. I am sure that readers of this group
>> can think of something better.
>>
>> "Rob the Robber, Who? Who? Who?
>> "Who will he Rob Next, You? You? You?"
>
> Sam Sloan choses to believe a certain alt-chess type in order to
> suggest 'Robber'. Some say the alt-chess type is the author of My 61
> Games.
>
> At least Sam Sloan is a believer - I convinced him once that Botvinnik
> was Cornish, and he also believed the April Fool's joke about SP, the
> chess castle, the nuns, the whole 9 yards - all it lacked was the
> perpetual motion and a modest canal.
>
>> We should also remember to give Susan Polgar her 40th birthday party,
>> as it is coming soon.
>
> I bought her a book, but its too good to send unread, so maybe I'll
> delay awhile?
>
>
> As for Rob Mitchell I can suggest a few slogans, and maybe Sam Sloan
> would agree with them? He is after all very brave with his opinions
> about others - can he be as brave himself?
>
> "I am not afraid to take a high-school level background check."
>
> "Anyone having to do with our children should be / required / to take
> a high school level background check."
>
> That's just off the top, but we could even go for:
>
> "Decency is important to the American People" or actually much better:
>
> "Decent, Legal, Honest and Truthful."
>
> I wonder if its time for those values - and I further wonder if there
> could possibly be any flak about a decent person running under that
> banner. Personally, I think chess folks could really go for it,
> especially after the past two years.
>
> If for any reason Sam Sloan likes these ideas, then he might vote for
> Rob Mitchell himself, or state his objections to why these qualities
> seem reprehensible to such as his own intelligence.
>
> Phil Innes
> The Frozen Republic of Vermont
>
>
>> Sam Sloan
>
Hey, BB! What has happened to chessdiscussion.com? As chief Trolgar
flack, you must have an inside scoop to share with us. ;-)
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 15:00:15
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:39:50 -0800 (PST), [email protected] wrote:
>"Decency is important to the American People" or actually much better:
>
>"Decent, Legal, Honest and Truthful."
If Rob plans to run on the Polgar Slate, there is one big is-sue:
How can we expect faithful Federation stewardship from one allied to
an EB member currently making a mockery of her own stewardship
obligation by trying to destroy the Federation financially?
We expect "honest and truthful" explanations from such a candidate.
And they better be good.
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 22:57:26
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
[email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 15, 10:35 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We should try to think of some good campaign slogans, to help Rob the
>> Robber on his way to election victory.
>
> "I play chess against anyone who shows up?"
>
>> Here is my first feeble attempt. I am sure that readers of this group
>> can think of something better.
>>
>> "Rob the Robber, Who? Who? Who?
>> "Who will he Rob Next, You? You? You?"
>
> Sam Sloan choses to believe a certain alt-chess type in order to
> suggest 'Robber'. Some say the alt-chess type is the author of My 61
> Games.
>
> At least Sam Sloan is a believer - I convinced him once that Botvinnik
> was Cornish, and he also believed the April Fool's joke about SP, the
> chess castle, the nuns, the whole 9 yards - all it lacked was the
> perpetual motion and a modest canal.
>
>> We should also remember to give Susan Polgar her 40th birthday party,
>> as it is coming soon.
>
> I bought her a book, but its too good to send unread, so maybe I'll
> delay awhile?
>
>
> As for Rob Mitchell I can suggest a few slogans, and maybe Sam Sloan
> would agree with them? He is after all very brave with his opinions
> about others - can he be as brave himself?
>
> "I am not afraid to take a high-school level background check."
>
> "Anyone having to do with our children should be / required / to take
> a high school level background check."
>
> That's just off the top, but we could even go for:
>
> "Decency is important to the American People" or actually much better:
>
> "Decent, Legal, Honest and Truthful."
>
> I wonder if its time for those values - and I further wonder if there
> could possibly be any flak about a decent person running under that
> banner. Personally, I think chess folks could really go for it,
> especially after the past two years.
>
> If for any reason Sam Sloan likes these ideas, then he might vote for
> Rob Mitchell himself, or state his objections to why these qualities
> seem reprehensible to such as his own intelligence.
>
> Phil Innes
> The Frozen Republic of Vermont
>
>
>> Sam Sloan
>
A question for Phil the Flak----what happened to chessdiscussion.com?
Are they destroying evidence?
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 07:35:22
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
We should try to think of some good campaign slogans, to help Rob the
Robber on his way to election victory.
Here is my first feeble attempt. I am sure that readers of this group
can think of something better.
"Rob the Robber, Who? Who? Who?
"Who will he Rob Next, You? You? You?"
We should also remember to give Susan Polgar her 40th birthday party,
as it is coming soon.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 04:12:51
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Rob the Who?
|
On Dec 15, 12:33=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 12, 4:28 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
> > USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>
> > If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
> > fray.
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> Who is Rob the Robber???
Rob Mitchell, an insurance agent in Tennessee. He's a rabid Trollgar
supporter, although he's become very quiet since the USCF sued Polgar.
|
| |
Date: 14 Dec 2008 21:33:21
From:
Subject: Re: Rob the Robber to Run for USCF Executive Board
|
On Dec 12, 4:28=EF=BF=BDpm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> Rumors are circulating that Rob the Robber is planning a run for the
> USCF Executive Board on the Susan Polgar slate.
>
> If this is true, I wish to personally welcome Rob the Robber to the
> fray.
>
> Sam Sloan
Who is Rob the Robber???
|
|
