| |
Main
Date: 26 Nov 2007 21:26:06
From: Fritz Wuehler
Subject: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
|
Rebuttal Evidence that Paul Truong is N.O.T the Fake Sam Sloan
Is PT mad? To leave such an obvious trail behind? Of course no.
PT has been used, framed, set up then outed. He's an innocent.
Mottershead only proved they came from PT's computer. But who
was quietly controlling the output from that computer?
Mottershead's alleged facts do not support his stated conclusion-
"The odds against all of these correlations occurring by chance are
overwhelming. The only reasonable inference that can be drawn from
the evidence is that Paul Truong and the person behind the Fake
Sam Sloan posts on Usenet are one and the same person."
I just checked, that is what it still says.
Brain's facts instead give reasonable support to the conclusion-
"The likely inference that can be drawn from the evidence is that
Paul Truong's computer was used to make the Fake Sam Sloan posts on
Usenet."
The words "trojan", "malware" and even the irrelevant "virus" or
anything like it do not occur even once inside Mottershead's self-
promoted "report". The expert didn't even consider the most obvious,
given that PT is no fool. Everything screams to PT having been
framed.
There's plenty of guys with the knowledge, information, motive and
time to have infected PT's portable. I bet I could and I don't know
anything about computers, as is obvious. TTU's hardware firewall
could have been an adequate block, but the infection occurred in
2005, long before that time. PT should have used a linux box, as I
do. There's currently 10-20 D.I.Y. trojan infection kits available
on Kazaa for free, more via ed2K, to-link, edonkey. Maybe some of
them work (the rest merely infect your own computer, serves you
right) and I should know.
So it must be asked, is Brain joking or is he a joke himself? What
are Mottershead's forensic/academic qualifications? Is his agenda to
set Sammy up for an even bigger fall than in the past? I guess not.
Sammy sets himself up without any assistance.
That Brain does not even know how most spam gets propagated makes
me shake my head that the USCF used him. Spam (no, not that Spam)
gets propagated through PCs and servers that have been compromised
either overtly through trojan activity or operator carelessness
(the classic open server, 100K+ available at any time on the web,
and only a few of these are fly-traps run by spooks) or both.
Mottershead is way out over his potter's head. I recommend PT sues
him immediately for defamation with a claim for exemplary damages
given the gratuitous nature of the "work" and the sheer negligence
and stupidity of the "conclusion". It is a slam dunk. Not a slam of
any other kind.
Bill G.'s known this for 6 weeks now. Guess that's why he's not
taking the s_it seriously. The only one taking it seriously seems to
be the other Bill, but why I can't imagine except to troll Sammy
by Rule 11ing him incorrectly. Greg K. feels left out.
In here I name the person with most to gain from the fiasco. All
good things come in the end to those who "per-server", as M.McFly
could have said at the back end of one of the Futures.
Moskow ought to be told that Mottershead overlooked something major
Bogner never could have picked up.
At a certain tournament in 2004 Sammy approaches at least one member
who is known to be an internet expert and presses him for details on
how to install a trojan (apparently not the term Sammy used) remotely
on an XP+SPx box so as to gain control of it. Sammy styles it as if
the motivation was he was concerned that he could get hacked by one
of his 73000 admirers (365 x 10 x 2 x 10 subjects needed). But then
***** ******* got the impression that what Sammy wanted was quite the
opposite, like asking if Midi popup could be used to install malware.
Expert says no though he admits later that the answer may be yes.
Why? He knows the only asshole who embeds Midis.
Did Sammy then find in the next 9-12 months a hacker with less by the
way of scruples? I do not know. What can Brian think? Or even know?
Has he considered these possibilities? Forgeries emanating from a
trollgarian laptop does not surely equate to bulgarian authorship.
With thanks to giganews I've reviewed a few Real Sam Sloan postings
in the last couple years. Perhaps Sam makes a big deal protesting or
professing his inexpertise at internet matters. Like confusing ISP
with IP. This from a guy who changes his ISP, address, websites more
frequently than his underwear, and knows how to use re-nailers?
I believe this "lady" protests a little too much, and that Sammy does
know a lot more than he lets on. There is no doubt in my mind that he
was the person behind many of the anonymice in past years whom he is
careful not to mention in 07-CIV-8537. Did anyone truly doubt that Qusz
was really Sammy? Once Dorsch stopped Slamming the Stoan, the attention
whore took over the reins and slammed away. Sammy was usually quite
kind when referring to them, which also struck a false Midi chord.
If I wasn't kidding I would say Sammy now thinks he's seen a way to
make a buck from the shite, and "poor" naif Moskow may foot the bill
(via Bill) to save USchess. By wrecking the deal the GM has saved the
M.D. a wad. Will he wise up and resume sponsorship? I hope so.
I think PT's guilty of one thing. That's misunderestimating how long
a hand our Sammy is capable of playing. This is Sammy's last chance
for a big scam, and for every big scam you need 1 rich sucker or 2
almost-an-FMs. Except that Sammy'd ever stoop to pulling a scam.
There's one person with more time on his hands than PT. Who? That is
Sammy, himself. The guilt-by-availability smear may backfire and it
makes Sammy look lamer than St Barnabas's best were able to manage.
The trojan/s installed on trollgarian computer/s would, I guess, have
been remotely commanded some time in mid-September to self-wipe? If
this hara-kiri has been even slightly screwed up, though, PT should
be able to get someone to find some trace the malware has left behind.
That would be enough to blow the suit way out of the water, with what
was claimed to be a prima facie case turning into a prima feces one.
For the infection to have been successful, PT's IP in 2005 would have
to have been known. This could be from any email from him, any forum
posting identified as being his or from PT being lured onto some
website. Has Mottershead addressed these possibilities? If so, where?
I don't dispute with BM that spoofing IP / NNTP-host over such a long
period is /nearly/ impossible. It is the authorship that is moot. Who
had access to USCF forum logs in 2004/5?
Amusing how EJ got overlooked by all the armchair-defective Maigrets.
Motive. Opportunity. Time. Information. Means. Knowledge. Orientation.
Left-handed too, as was the perp. Angst. Expertise at post-removal.
Innes has probably noticed that "Reverend" Johnnie Walker is using
Thunderbird and posting from comcast. Tennyson, Ulysses.
I must make it clear I don't understand computers at all, myself, so I
am totally confused by all the advanced terms employed by Brain. When
I hear the word backdoor (another one he managed not to use in his
"expert" "report") I think of a piece of a house or a piece of anatomy.
I could be 100% wrong.
Strange enquiry by Sammy, though. And the risk to him if the expert
he may have asked back in '04 blows the whistle or even turns up as a
star defense witness is - what? Sammy's bulletproof against li'gation.
That is not to say Sammy did it or got someone to do it. It could well
be one of the many who are jealous of or pissed with either half of
trollgaria who set up the infection so as to frame them. Or one of the
many fans of Sammy, unbeknownst to him, trying for the same. I point no
finger. Maybe some multimillionaire hired someone. Doesn't a joik from
some Caribbean mudpond claim every few weeks on google groups that he
is a very dangerous bipolar multimillionaire to cross(ville)?
>From Moskow, Sammy's got more to gain in this than PT, who had quite
nothing to gain. As PT proved, he barely makes a thin dime in chess
profits. He does it for love. It just does not stack up. That is why
Sammy had to spend so much space in the complaint padding out the far-
fetched idea of a grand anti-Sloan conspiracy as he was such a thorn
in the side of the corrupt politicians. In reality we, or rather they,
ignored Sammy most of the time and he got out-voted whenever needed.
The mistakes in the complaint could be seen to indicate a mindset-
"Plaintiff demands [...]
An order baring Paul Truong and Susan Polgar [...]"
Somehow, especially given Sammy's recent fantasy about a pron video
starring Susan (for sure no such video exists whatever Sammy alleged
in Message-ID: [email protected])
one just cannot picture the N.Y. District Court ordering Paul and
Susan to get naked ("baring" them). Live with it, Sammy, it ain't
going to happen this side of the second coming, and you needn't be
an almost-a-Ph.D. to realize this. You even goofed in COUNT I,
which alleges you were impersonated with 3000 posts "FROM JUNE 25,
2007 TO THE PRESENT DATE" when there aren't even 2500 such "posts"
in the time since 2005, let alone since 2007.
I don't claim Sammy's more wrong than right in his criticisms of the
goddamned inept USCF administration. That's why Don and Beatriz play
ball with Sammy as they see it as the best chance to ward off the
triadic danger of playchess, icc, FIDE. Fuck OMOV and its proponents.
But Sammy's not the solution. He's a part of the problem.
Ray is wise to keep his powder dry. Research the silk-rope family of
trojans as I read that they can bind the finest web admins in knots.
Just one question. Did Duncan know he was going to be in round two of
the litigation? It is amazing what a webspider can find in the rooks
and hitherto unindexed crannies of Ishius websites. Sammy, you really
should not use folders on your site for work-in-progress (employing
"work" in the slackest possible sense of the word) . . .
I am not Jim Eade and I'm saying this as I don't want to encourage
Sammy to further alienate those who, like me, don't already think him
a total douchebag. I'm not responsible for any of the objectionable
postings either. I would never wish to fool a few simple yolks into
thinking I might be Larry, which is ludicrus given his Olympianesque
standards, solid moral fiber and oft-expressed dislike of cowardly
anonymice (except if funded by the man who wooed Kirsan).
You all know what Sammy doesn't know can do. One day I am going to
learn how to use computers, till then I too must limp along, hoping
one day to be as st as Mr. Grund.
hagiographical pudenda....
[REAL SAM SLOAN]
From: samsloan <[email protected] >
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.gossip.celebrities,alt.ch
ess
Subject: Susan Polgar Porn Video
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:56:32 -0800
Path:
news.gnilink.net!cycny02.gnilink.net!newspump2.sol.net!postnews.google.com!
d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.120.149.154
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195048592 24833 127.0.0.1 (14 Nov 2007
13:56:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:56:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Greengard 2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: [email protected]
Injection-Info: d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.120.149.154;
posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: news.gnilink.net rec.games.chess.politics:108337
rec.games.chess.misc:72665 alt.gossip.celebrities:101755 alt.chess:9790
A dirty little secret circulating privately for quite some time is the
existence of a porn video starring Susan Polgar.
I do not believe that it has been commercially produced. I do know
that Paul Truong has it. Perhaps he intends to use it to blackmail
her, if necessary.
It was apparently made some time in the 1990s. That is all I know
about it.
I do not think it is a big deal. Almost everybody is making porn
videos of themselves nowadays. It is quite the thing to do.
However, in Susan's case it becomes an issue because of her vocal
complaints about one of her female rivals wearing revealing clothing.
Susan has even called the rival a "slut" and a "Lolita", although that
female rival has never appeared in a porn video or even nude.
[FAKE SAM SLOAN]
From: samsloan <[email protected] > FAKE FAKE FAKE
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,misc.legal,alt.chess,soc.cult
ure.vietnamese
Path:
news.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!cycny01.gnilink.net!news.glorb.com
!postnews.google.com!r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Subject: My wife will blow you for $10
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 06:49:23 -0600
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
References: <[email protected] >
<[email protected] >
<[email protected] >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.163.100.136
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1185108563 26852 127.0.0.1 (22 Jul 2007
12:49:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:49:23 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected] >
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT
6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506;
.NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1
Turboweb [rtc-tc081 8.4.1], HTTP/1.1 cache-rtc-ac07.proxy.aol.com[98A36488]
(Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])
Complaints-To: [email protected]
Injection-Info: r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=152.163.100.136;
posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Xref: news.gnilink.net rec.games.chess.politics:103029
She agreed to fuck me for her Green Card. She also has to work to
support me for 10 years. I urge everyone to follow my example.
There're a lot of bitches out there willing to blow you daily for a
Green Card.
---<snipped >---
[REAL SAM SLOAN]
From: [email protected] (Sam Sloan)
Newsgroups:
soc.culture.magyar,rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,misc.legal
,alt.chess
Subject: The Age of Consent in Hungary is 14
Organization: Ishi Press
Path:
news.gnilink.net!newsr2.gnilink.net!cycny02.gnilink.net!newspump.sol.net!ne
wspeer1.asbnva01.us.to.verio.netnewsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net!8b18be56
!not-for-mail
Reply-To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:51:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.199.110.255
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net 1154184742 68.199.110.255 (Sat,
29 Jul 2006 14:52:22 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:52:22 GMT
Xref: news.gnilink.net rec.games.chess.politics:82746
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe#Hungary
The age of consent in Hungary is 14 as specified by Section 201
(Seduction), which reads: "The person who has sexual intercourse with
a person who has not yet completed his 14th year, as well as the
person who has completed his 18th year and engages in fornication with
a person who has not yet exceeded his 14th year of age, commits a
felony and shall be punishable with imprisonment from 1 to 5 years."
Hungarian Criminal Code (in Hungarian)
[Almost-BINFO}
Leafing through the paperwork, I saw that on Apr.17 we took SS
250. Is there any way the EB can dress [...]
[found - but why name fans, dead people & anonyms?]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
____________________________________
Sam Sloan,
Plaintiff,
-against-
Greg Shahade, Edward Winter, Judit Polgar, Taylor Kingston, Larisa
Yudina, Joel Benjamin, Neil Brennan, Louis Blair, Duncan Oxley, Eric
---<snipped >---
----- Adapted from Original Post -----
From: "Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <[email protected] >
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 03:12:21 -0500
Subject: I have pieced together the WHOLE mystery
You can blame ONE individual for this ENTIRE mess, and it's NOT the
"Fake Shame Sloan." Many are guilty, but it all falls from one
domino. The snake will live unless its head is chopped off. Samuel
H. Sloan appears to be playing into the hands of the snake and
voice of reason.
|
|
| |
Date: 27 Nov 2007 02:06:33
From: help bot
Subject: Re: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
|
On Nov 27, 4:31 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
<[email protected] > wrote:
> >The even
> > more-recent TV commercials showing GK giving a simul?
>
> Probably the best chess-in-media ever done, as it raised the viewer to the
> level of the game rather than bringing the game down to the level of the
> viewer. Those who didn't understand what a simul was, had to look it up.
I liked it, but had a few criticisms. One of these is the
idea that some teeny-bopper kid can stump a world champ
cold with a mere TN in the opening. That is rubbish: in
order to beat GK, the child would require the technique
of a very strong master, in addition to such a surprise.
This concept is apparently worshiped by the masses
who devote virtually all their study to the opening phase.
Another criticism is the likelihood that a mere child
could actually have stunned the king of openings
preparation himself in such a manner. Far more likely
is a scenario where the kid blindly follows Mickey
Mouse analysis by Eric Schiller or Andy Soltis, then
is soundly beaten to a pulp by a move those writers
failed to even consider, or mis-evaluated.
In the real world, the guy who stops the simul-giver
has probably got some master standing behind him,
feeding him moves, as in GM Capablanca vs. young
Botvinnik et al.
Lastly, I would criticize the commercial for the fact
that some viewers will not even recall what was being
advertised (Yahoo? Google's search engine?).
At any rate, the posturing by IM Innes is laughable;
he wants to play the role of "bringer of chess to TV",
yet nobody I know has a clue what he is talking about.
I am vaguely reminded of the postings about some
unknown USCF Expert who wanders the East coast,
claiming greatness; in that case, someone finally
explained that many players on the East Coast have
"seen him" and know who he is. Well, la de dah.
The same idea could be applied to some people in
my neck of the woods; for instance, several Midwest
tournament directors are quite well known, but as
for self-proclaimed greatness, one need look no
further than Emory Tate (who thinks he is a GM).
I'll back Mr. Tate against that other delusional any
time.
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 27 Nov 2007 09:23:51
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Re: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
|
>> >The even
>> > more-recent TV commercials showing GK giving a simul?
>>
>> Probably the best chess-in-media ever done, as it raised the viewer to
>> the
>> level of the game rather than bringing the game down to the level of the
>> viewer. Those who didn't understand what a simul was, had to look it up.
>
>
> I liked it, but had a few criticisms. One of these is the
> idea that some teeny-bopper kid can stump a world champ
> cold with a mere TN in the opening. That is rubbish: in
> order to beat GK, the child would require the technique
> of a very strong master, in addition to such a surprise.
All he did was make Kasparov slow down to normal speed for one move, like
many booked-up kids routinely do to older players.
> This concept is apparently worshiped by the masses
> who devote virtually all their study to the opening phase.
Probably because the first advantage in a high-level chess game tends to be
decisive.
> Another criticism is the likelihood that a mere child
> could actually have stunned the king of openings
> preparation himself in such a manner. Far more likely
> is a scenario where the kid blindly follows Mickey
> Mouse analysis by Eric Schiller or Andy Soltis, then
> is soundly beaten to a pulp by a move those writers
> failed to even consider, or mis-evaluated.
The purpose of the commercial was to show the value of information, and many
GMs have indeed talked about players who spring internet-inspired surprises.
A 2000 player now can beat anyone in the world on their best game. Chess
isn't what it used to be. Even the 1400s seem to know theory that in my day
escaped them.
> In the real world, the guy who stops the simul-giver
> has probably got some master standing behind him,
> feeding him moves, as in GM Capablanca vs. young
> Botvinnik et al.
>
> Lastly, I would criticize the commercial for the fact
> that some viewers will not even recall what was being
> advertised (Yahoo? Google's search engine?).
Actually I think it was a different one that was popular at the time. If
not that, it was Yahoo.
> At any rate, the posturing by IM Innes is laughable;
> he wants to play the role of "bringer of chess to TV",
> yet nobody I know has a clue what he is talking about.
> I am vaguely reminded of the postings about some
> unknown USCF Expert who wanders the East coast,
> claiming greatness; in that case, someone finally
> explained that many players on the East Coast have
> "seen him" and know who he is.
>Well, la de dah.
> The same idea could be applied to some people in
> my neck of the woods; for instance, several Midwest
> tournament directors are quite well known, but as
> for self-proclaimed greatness, one need look no
> further than Emory Tate (who thinks he is a GM).
> I'll back Mr. Tate against that other delusional any
> time.
Actually Tate and the other guy play for money quite regularly, and are not
that far apart in strength at Blitz.
I think "prolific" would have been a better term, but remember that chess
hustlers are held to an entirely different standard, one similar to
playground players in basketball in the inner cities. When guys play out in
the open all day, every day, it's not easy to hide their flaws, which are
known, and their many strengths, which are also known.
Tate tried giving me 5-2 time odds once and got wiped.
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-keted commercial seduction methods which
no longer work.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
|
| |
Date: 27 Nov 2007 00:56:59
From: help bot
Subject: Re: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
|
On Nov 26, 5:03 pm, "Chess One" <[email protected] > wrote:
> You have said it! You have said /almost/ everything, Fritz. What you have
> not said is maybe unknown to you, but a courtroom will decide what is true
> or untrue.
Wrong track. Courtrooms decide issues pertaining
to law, not truth.
> It is tough, in my opinion, to make any headway on promoting chess in the
> USA, and I have played only a minor role in doing so in getting chess on TV
> for a few hours, which no-one else has done for 35 years
Wake up, sleepy-head! Have you so quickly forgotten
the GMs Fischer/Spassky rematch of 1992? The even
more-recent TV commercials showing GK giving a simul?
Television coverage of Bobby Fischer being arrested in
Japan? The recent serial-killer who was stopped before
completing all 64 "squares" of his sinister plan? Chess
is on TV a lot, actually.
> > Is PT mad? To leave such an obvious trail behind?
Turn this around to check for validity: is SS "mad"?
Would he be any more likely than PT to leave such
a trail of breadcrumbs? What reason is there to
assume PT was, like Tigran Petrosian when he
defeated Boris Spassky, the "more clever"?
Why are we told that a) the poster "knows almost
nothing about computers"
but then b) he rambles on and on about technical
things relating to computers, as if he thinks himself
an expert?
Why does he wish the lawsuit dropped now, rather
than allowed to run its course? The answer is self-
evident. Fear. Mr. Sloan has somebody on the run.
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 27 Nov 2007 04:31:31
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Re: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
|
>The even
> more-recent TV commercials showing GK giving a simul?
Probably the best chess-in-media ever done, as it raised the viewer to the
level of the game rather than bringing the game down to the level of the
viewer. Those who didn't understand what a simul was, had to look it up.
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-keted commercial seduction methods which
no longer work.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
|
| |
Date: 26 Nov 2007 18:53:35
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
|
Message from discussion the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
View parsed - Show only message text
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!
feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-
x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: Fritz Wuehler
<[email protected] >
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <[email protected] >.
Identifying the real sender is technically impossible.
Subject: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
CC: [email protected],[email protected]
X-Posting-Kit: Custom version 1.3a
X-Trojan-Insert: 2.003.191ss2
X-No-Archive: yes
X-NNTP-Posting-Host-bak: 75.111.194.9
X-NNTP-Posting-Host-smack: 9.194.111.75
X-NNTP-Posting-Host-crack: 75.194.9.111
X-NNTP-Posting-Host-crank: 111.75.194.9
X-NNTP-Posting-Host-back: 9.75.111.194
X-Tracker:
rjfischersendshisthankstoappropriateauthoritiesandsaysboobyrulesok
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
<[email protected] >
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.politics,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.romance.teen,rec.games.go
X-Comment: Patriot Act X-Tracker header is injected to identify the
sender to appropriate authorities
Message-ID:
<[email protected] >
Precedence: anon
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:26:06 +0100
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit - Mail2News
Rebuttal Evidence that Paul Truong is N.O.T the Fake Sam Sloan
Is PT mad? To leave such an obvious trail behind? Of course no.
PT has been used, framed, set up then outed. He's an innocent.
Mottershead only proved they came from PT's computer. But who
was quietly controlling the output from that computer?
|
| |
Date: 26 Nov 2007 17:03:03
From: Chess One
Subject: Re: the masked bishop and the fake sam sloan
|
You have said it! You have said /almost/ everything, Fritz. What you have
not said is maybe unknown to you, but a courtroom will decide what is true
or untrue. As to other factors, such as people being taken in by this stuff,
such as Moskow, and the frenzy in this newsgroup, I listened to Moskow on
the phone for half an hour, and my needle did not quiver, not any degree!
In fact, but that would be about him, and for sure, we need to depart heavy
personality influence in US chess to move forward.
It is tough, in my opinion, to make any headway on promoting chess in the
USA, and I have played only a minor role in doing so in getting chess on TV
for a few hours, which no-one else has done for 35 years, bless 'em,
nevertheless more than USCF ever did!
But for Polgar/Troung, they achieve the serious attention of those who hate
the idea of any change from the extant standard of utter mediocrity, and
this is a more difficult thing, and a ///very/// targeted thing!
We will see what happens in public. In private USCF seems dead, as 'dead' as
Kasparov exclaimed it to be. And if a dead entity can provide something to
promote US chess, I always think what a live one might do?
Cordially, Phil Innes
.romance.teen,rec.games.go newsgroups snipped
"Fritz Wuehler" <[email protected] > wrote
in message
news:[email protected]...
> Rebuttal Evidence that Paul Truong is N.O.T the Fake Sam Sloan
>
> Is PT mad? To leave such an obvious trail behind? Of course no.
> PT has been used, framed, set up then outed. He's an innocent.
>
> Mottershead only proved they came from PT's computer. But who
> was quietly controlling the output from that computer?
>
> Mottershead's alleged facts do not support his stated conclusion-
> "The odds against all of these correlations occurring by chance are
> overwhelming. The only reasonable inference that can be drawn from
> the evidence is that Paul Truong and the person behind the Fake
> Sam Sloan posts on Usenet are one and the same person."
> I just checked, that is what it still says.
>
> Brain's facts instead give reasonable support to the conclusion-
> "The likely inference that can be drawn from the evidence is that
> Paul Truong's computer was used to make the Fake Sam Sloan posts on
> Usenet."
>
> The words "trojan", "malware" and even the irrelevant "virus" or
> anything like it do not occur even once inside Mottershead's self-
> promoted "report". The expert didn't even consider the most obvious,
> given that PT is no fool. Everything screams to PT having been
> framed.
>
> There's plenty of guys with the knowledge, information, motive and
> time to have infected PT's portable. I bet I could and I don't know
> anything about computers, as is obvious. TTU's hardware firewall
> could have been an adequate block, but the infection occurred in
> 2005, long before that time. PT should have used a linux box, as I
> do. There's currently 10-20 D.I.Y. trojan infection kits available
> on Kazaa for free, more via ed2K, to-link, edonkey. Maybe some of
> them work (the rest merely infect your own computer, serves you
> right) and I should know.
>
> So it must be asked, is Brain joking or is he a joke himself? What
> are Mottershead's forensic/academic qualifications? Is his agenda to
> set Sammy up for an even bigger fall than in the past? I guess not.
> Sammy sets himself up without any assistance.
>
> That Brain does not even know how most spam gets propagated makes
> me shake my head that the USCF used him. Spam (no, not that Spam)
> gets propagated through PCs and servers that have been compromised
> either overtly through trojan activity or operator carelessness
> (the classic open server, 100K+ available at any time on the web,
> and only a few of these are fly-traps run by spooks) or both.
>
> Mottershead is way out over his potter's head. I recommend PT sues
> him immediately for defamation with a claim for exemplary damages
> given the gratuitous nature of the "work" and the sheer negligence
> and stupidity of the "conclusion". It is a slam dunk. Not a slam of
> any other kind.
>
> Bill G.'s known this for 6 weeks now. Guess that's why he's not
> taking the s_it seriously. The only one taking it seriously seems to
> be the other Bill, but why I can't imagine except to troll Sammy
> by Rule 11ing him incorrectly. Greg K. feels left out.
>
> In here I name the person with most to gain from the fiasco. All
> good things come in the end to those who "per-server", as M.McFly
> could have said at the back end of one of the Futures.
>
> Moskow ought to be told that Mottershead overlooked something major
> Bogner never could have picked up.
>
> At a certain tournament in 2004 Sammy approaches at least one member
> who is known to be an internet expert and presses him for details on
> how to install a trojan (apparently not the term Sammy used) remotely
> on an XP+SPx box so as to gain control of it. Sammy styles it as if
> the motivation was he was concerned that he could get hacked by one
> of his 73000 admirers (365 x 10 x 2 x 10 subjects needed). But then
> ***** ******* got the impression that what Sammy wanted was quite the
> opposite, like asking if Midi popup could be used to install malware.
> Expert says no though he admits later that the answer may be yes.
> Why? He knows the only asshole who embeds Midis.
>
> Did Sammy then find in the next 9-12 months a hacker with less by the
> way of scruples? I do not know. What can Brian think? Or even know?
> Has he considered these possibilities? Forgeries emanating from a
> trollgarian laptop does not surely equate to bulgarian authorship.
>
> With thanks to giganews I've reviewed a few Real Sam Sloan postings
> in the last couple years. Perhaps Sam makes a big deal protesting or
> professing his inexpertise at internet matters. Like confusing ISP
> with IP. This from a guy who changes his ISP, address, websites more
> frequently than his underwear, and knows how to use re-nailers?
>
> I believe this "lady" protests a little too much, and that Sammy does
> know a lot more than he lets on. There is no doubt in my mind that he
> was the person behind many of the anonymice in past years whom he is
> careful not to mention in 07-CIV-8537. Did anyone truly doubt that Qusz
> was really Sammy? Once Dorsch stopped Slamming the Stoan, the attention
> whore took over the reins and slammed away. Sammy was usually quite
> kind when referring to them, which also struck a false Midi chord.
>
> If I wasn't kidding I would say Sammy now thinks he's seen a way to
> make a buck from the shite, and "poor" naif Moskow may foot the bill
> (via Bill) to save USchess. By wrecking the deal the GM has saved the
> M.D. a wad. Will he wise up and resume sponsorship? I hope so.
>
> I think PT's guilty of one thing. That's misunderestimating how long
> a hand our Sammy is capable of playing. This is Sammy's last chance
> for a big scam, and for every big scam you need 1 rich sucker or 2
> almost-an-FMs. Except that Sammy'd ever stoop to pulling a scam.
>
> There's one person with more time on his hands than PT. Who? That is
> Sammy, himself. The guilt-by-availability smear may backfire and it
> makes Sammy look lamer than St Barnabas's best were able to manage.
>
> The trojan/s installed on trollgarian computer/s would, I guess, have
> been remotely commanded some time in mid-September to self-wipe? If
> this hara-kiri has been even slightly screwed up, though, PT should
> be able to get someone to find some trace the malware has left behind.
> That would be enough to blow the suit way out of the water, with what
> was claimed to be a prima facie case turning into a prima feces one.
>
> For the infection to have been successful, PT's IP in 2005 would have
> to have been known. This could be from any email from him, any forum
> posting identified as being his or from PT being lured onto some
> website. Has Mottershead addressed these possibilities? If so, where?
> I don't dispute with BM that spoofing IP / NNTP-host over such a long
> period is /nearly/ impossible. It is the authorship that is moot. Who
> had access to USCF forum logs in 2004/5?
>
> Amusing how EJ got overlooked by all the armchair-defective Maigrets.
> Motive. Opportunity. Time. Information. Means. Knowledge. Orientation.
> Left-handed too, as was the perp. Angst. Expertise at post-removal.
> Innes has probably noticed that "Reverend" Johnnie Walker is using
> Thunderbird and posting from comcast. Tennyson, Ulysses.
>
> I must make it clear I don't understand computers at all, myself, so I
> am totally confused by all the advanced terms employed by Brain. When
> I hear the word backdoor (another one he managed not to use in his
> "expert" "report") I think of a piece of a house or a piece of anatomy.
> I could be 100% wrong.
>
> Strange enquiry by Sammy, though. And the risk to him if the expert
> he may have asked back in '04 blows the whistle or even turns up as a
> star defense witness is - what? Sammy's bulletproof against li'gation.
>
> That is not to say Sammy did it or got someone to do it. It could well
> be one of the many who are jealous of or pissed with either half of
> trollgaria who set up the infection so as to frame them. Or one of the
> many fans of Sammy, unbeknownst to him, trying for the same. I point no
> finger. Maybe some multimillionaire hired someone. Doesn't a joik from
> some Caribbean mudpond claim every few weeks on google groups that he
> is a very dangerous bipolar multimillionaire to cross(ville)?
>
>>From Moskow, Sammy's got more to gain in this than PT, who had quite
> nothing to gain. As PT proved, he barely makes a thin dime in chess
> profits. He does it for love. It just does not stack up. That is why
> Sammy had to spend so much space in the complaint padding out the far-
> fetched idea of a grand anti-Sloan conspiracy as he was such a thorn
> in the side of the corrupt politicians. In reality we, or rather they,
> ignored Sammy most of the time and he got out-voted whenever needed.
>
> The mistakes in the complaint could be seen to indicate a mindset-
> "Plaintiff demands [...]
> An order baring Paul Truong and Susan Polgar [...]"
> Somehow, especially given Sammy's recent fantasy about a pron video
> starring Susan (for sure no such video exists whatever Sammy alleged
> in Message-ID: [email protected])
> one just cannot picture the N.Y. District Court ordering Paul and
> Susan to get naked ("baring" them). Live with it, Sammy, it ain't
> going to happen this side of the second coming, and you needn't be
> an almost-a-Ph.D. to realize this. You even goofed in COUNT I,
> which alleges you were impersonated with 3000 posts "FROM JUNE 25,
> 2007 TO THE PRESENT DATE" when there aren't even 2500 such "posts"
> in the time since 2005, let alone since 2007.
>
> I don't claim Sammy's more wrong than right in his criticisms of the
> goddamned inept USCF administration. That's why Don and Beatriz play
> ball with Sammy as they see it as the best chance to ward off the
> triadic danger of playchess, icc, FIDE. Fuck OMOV and its proponents.
> But Sammy's not the solution. He's a part of the problem.
>
> Ray is wise to keep his powder dry. Research the silk-rope family of
> trojans as I read that they can bind the finest web admins in knots.
>
> Just one question. Did Duncan know he was going to be in round two of
> the litigation? It is amazing what a webspider can find in the rooks
> and hitherto unindexed crannies of Ishius websites. Sammy, you really
> should not use folders on your site for work-in-progress (employing
> "work" in the slackest possible sense of the word) . . .
>
> I am not Jim Eade and I'm saying this as I don't want to encourage
> Sammy to further alienate those who, like me, don't already think him
> a total douchebag. I'm not responsible for any of the objectionable
> postings either. I would never wish to fool a few simple yolks into
> thinking I might be Larry, which is ludicrus given his Olympianesque
> standards, solid moral fiber and oft-expressed dislike of cowardly
> anonymice (except if funded by the man who wooed Kirsan).
>
> You all know what Sammy doesn't know can do. One day I am going to
> learn how to use computers, till then I too must limp along, hoping
> one day to be as st as Mr. Grund.
>
> hagiographical pudenda....
>
> [REAL SAM SLOAN]
> From: samsloan <[email protected]>
> Newsgroups:
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.gossip.celebrities,alt.ch
> ess
> Subject: Susan Polgar Porn Video
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:56:32 -0800
> Path:
> news.gnilink.net!cycny02.gnilink.net!newspump2.sol.net!postnews.google.com!
> d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.120.149.154
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195048592 24833 127.0.0.1 (14 Nov 2007
> 13:56:32 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:56:32 +0000 (UTC)
> User-Agent: Greengard 2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> Complaints-To: [email protected]
> Injection-Info: d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.120.149.154;
> posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
> rec.games.chess.misc:72665 alt.gossip.celebrities:101755 alt.chess:9790
>
> A dirty little secret circulating privately for quite some time is the
> existence of a porn video starring Susan Polgar.
> I do not believe that it has been commercially produced. I do know
> that Paul Truong has it. Perhaps he intends to use it to blackmail
> her, if necessary.
> It was apparently made some time in the 1990s. That is all I know
> about it.
> I do not think it is a big deal. Almost everybody is making porn
> videos of themselves nowadays. It is quite the thing to do.
> However, in Susan's case it becomes an issue because of her vocal
> complaints about one of her female rivals wearing revealing clothing.
> Susan has even called the rival a "slut" and a "Lolita", although that
> female rival has never appeared in a porn video or even nude.
>
>
> [FAKE SAM SLOAN]
> From: samsloan <[email protected]> FAKE FAKE FAKE
> Newsgroups:
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,misc.legal,alt.chess,soc.cult
> ure.vietnamese
> Path:
> news.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!cycny01.gnilink.net!news.glorb.com
> !postnews.google.com!r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Subject: My wife will blow you for $10
> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 06:49:23 -0600
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> References: <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.163.100.136
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1185108563 26852 127.0.0.1 (22 Jul 2007
> 12:49:23 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:49:23 +0000 (UTC)
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT
> 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506;
> .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1
> Turboweb [rtc-tc081 8.4.1], HTTP/1.1
> cache-rtc-ac07.proxy.aol.com[98A36488]
> (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])
> Complaints-To: [email protected]
> Injection-Info: r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com;
> posting-host=152.163.100.136;
> posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
>
> She agreed to fuck me for her Green Card. She also has to work to
> support me for 10 years. I urge everyone to follow my example.
> There're a lot of bitches out there willing to blow you daily for a
> Green Card.
> ---<snipped>---
>
>
> [REAL SAM SLOAN]
> From: [email protected] (Sam Sloan)
> Newsgroups:
> soc.culture.magyar,rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,misc.legal
> ,alt.chess
> Subject: The Age of Consent in Hungary is 14
> Organization: Ishi Press
> Path:
> news.gnilink.net!newsr2.gnilink.net!cycny02.gnilink.net!newspump.sol.net!ne
> wspeer1.asbnva01.us.to.verio.netnewsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net!8b18be56
> !not-for-mail
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:51:44 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.199.110.255
> X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> X-Trace: newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net 1154184742 68.199.110.255
> (Sat,
> 29 Jul 2006 14:52:22 GMT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:52:22 GMT
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe#Hungary
> The age of consent in Hungary is 14 as specified by Section 201
> (Seduction), which reads: "The person who has sexual intercourse with
> a person who has not yet completed his 14th year, as well as the
> person who has completed his 18th year and engages in fornication with
> a person who has not yet exceeded his 14th year of age, commits a
> felony and shall be punishable with imprisonment from 1 to 5 years."
> Hungarian Criminal Code (in Hungarian)
>
>
> [Almost-BINFO}
> Leafing through the paperwork, I saw that on Apr.17 we took SS
> 250. Is there any way the EB can dress [...]
>
>
> [found - but why name fans, dead people & anonyms?]
> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
> SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
> ____________________________________
> Sam Sloan,
> Plaintiff,
> -against-
> Greg Shahade, Edward Winter, Judit Polgar, Taylor Kingston, Larisa
> Yudina, Joel Benjamin, Neil Brennan, Louis Blair, Duncan Oxley, Eric
> ---<snipped>---
>
>
> ----- Adapted from Original Post -----
> From: "Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <[email protected]>
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 03:12:21 -0500
> Subject: I have pieced together the WHOLE mystery
>
> You can blame ONE individual for this ENTIRE mess, and it's NOT the
> "Fake Shame Sloan." Many are guilty, but it all falls from one
> domino. The snake will live unless its head is chopped off. Samuel
> H. Sloan appears to be playing into the hands of the snake and
> voice of reason.
>
|
|
