| |
Main
Date: 21 Oct 2008 19:08:16
From: grabenhofer erich
Subject: Match 5
|
Warum machte Kramnik den offnensichtlichen Schnitzer
29.Sd4:?
|
|
| |
Date: 25 Oct 2008 22:25:58
From: chessplayer
Subject: Re: Match 5
|
On Oct 21, 10:08=A0pm, "grabenhofer erich" <[email protected] > wrote:
> Warum machte Kramnik den offnensichtlichen Schnitzer
> 29.Sd4:?
See my analysis in english. As I had mentioned in that post, the
strategy was not bad but the tactics by Kramnik were off. Before
playing N x d4 he should have played B x d7, black must play K x d7
and then Kramnik should have played N x d4. Black cannot take it with
the queen as that would trap his queen so he must play K e7 and then
Kramnik plays Rd1 black plays Rd8. See the entire line in my post
(Right upto the end game).
Even if Kramnik could not play perfect chess as written in computer
analysis, playing B x d7 before playing N x d4 would have still been
the smart thing to do. At worst the game would have been drawn and at
best it was a clear win for Kramnik. :)
|
| |
Date: 20 Oct 2008 21:14:39
From: ibarix
Subject: Re: Match 5
|
"grabenhofer erich" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Warum machte Kramnik den offnensichtlichen Schnitzer
> 29.Sd4:?
This group is rec.games.chess.analysis,
not rec.spiele.schach.analise
:))
|
| | |
Date: 21 Oct 2008 15:28:21
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Match 5
|
ibarix <[email protected] > wrote:
> "grabenhofer erich" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Warum machte Kramnik den offnensichtlichen Schnitzer 29.Sd4:?
>
> This group is rec.games.chess.analysis, not rec.spiele.schach.analise
It's also not rec.asshole.being-one but that didn't stop you.
To the original poster: you're more likely to get a helpful response
in English than in German. I'm not following the match closely so
I've lost track of which games have been discussed in detail here.
Dave.
--
David Richerby Natural Game (TM): it's like a
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ family board game but it's completely
natural!
|
| | | |
Date: 24 Oct 2008 22:18:48
From: ibarix
Subject: Re: Match 5
|
"David Richerby" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:9Er*[email protected]...
> ibarix <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "grabenhofer erich" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Warum machte Kramnik den offnensichtlichen Schnitzer 29.Sd4:?
>>
>> This group is rec.games.chess.analysis, not rec.spiele.schach.analise
>
> It's also not rec.asshole.being-one but that didn't stop you.
I've put a smiley so fuck you asshole.being-one.dave. When someone puts a
smiley, it means he's kidding and it's not serious comment. Don't go to the
usenet when nervous. Look, there is no smiley now. This is serious comment.
bye
> To the original poster: you're more likely to get a helpful response
> in English than in German. I'm not following the match closely so
> I've lost track of which games have been discussed in detail here.
>
>
> Dave.
|
|
