| |
Main
Date: 30 Nov 2005 11:39:24
From: FanofRayGordonswisdom
Subject: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Does anybody here know Ray Gordons nick on ICC? I would like to play
against this genius.
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 00:40:50
From:
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Can you post those nicks?
I read about "Le Modern Caveman" being him ....
AT
|
| |
Date: 30 Nov 2005 13:33:10
From:
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
For more information, go to
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.chess.analysis?lnk=lr
and write "Ray Gordon" or "Ray Parker" or "Roy Parker"
for example
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.chess.analysis/search?group=rec.games.chess.analysis&q=Gordon+Roy+Parker&qt_g=1&searchnow=Buscar+en+este+grupo
(do not break the link)
|
| |
Date: 30 Nov 2005 13:25:12
From:
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Matt Nemmers wrote here in RGCA:
Gordon Roy Parker should consider himself on notice that his views,
commentaries, trolling posts, and general opinions are outdated,
stupid, ignorant of FACTS, and most important, are just plain WRONG.
Nobody cares, Gordo. NOBODY. And *I* only reply to your trolling
because I like to make fun of you and the complete lack of any
semblence of logic or lucidity in your posts.
LOL. You're dumb.
MN
|
| |
Date: 30 Nov 2005 13:23:31
From:
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Long ago Frisco del Rosario wrote
"Gordon Ray Parker ICC nick is rndmndounsound"
I replied
The only player in "Lib rndmndounsound" up to 2000 was "Molton" and
lets see:
[Event "ICC 0 1"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2005.02.17"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Molton"]
[Black "RndMndOUnsound"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A45"]
[WhiteElo "2210"]
[BlackElo "1721"]
[PlyCount "76"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 Ne4 3. Bf4 g5 4. Be5 g4 5. Bxh8 Bh6 6. e3 Nxf2 7. Bd3
Bxe3 8.Qf3 Nxh1 9. Qxg4 e6 10. Qh5 Ke7 11. Qxh7 Bf2+ 12. Kd1 Kd6
13.Be5+
Kc6 14. Be4+ Kb6 15. Nf3 Bxd4 16. Bxd4+ c5 17. Nc3 d6 18. Na4+ Kb5
19.Qh6 cxd4 20. Qd2 d5 21. Qd3+ Kc6 22. Qb3 Nf2+ 23. Ke2 dxe4 24. Ne5+
Kd6 25. Qb4+ Kxe5 26. Kxf2 Qd5 27. g3 Nc6 28. Qc5 e3+ 29. Kg1 Qxc5
30.Nxc5 b6 31. Nd3+ Ke4 32. Rf1 f5 33.Rf4+ Kd5 34. b3 e5 35. Rxf5 Ba6
36.Rh5 Bxd3 37. cxd3 Rf8 38. Kg2 e2 {White resigns} 0-1
I'm sure no player made perfect moves in the first 10 moves in that
game.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 09:45:15
From: Tony Mountifield
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
In article <[email protected] >,
<[email protected] > wrote:
> Long ago Frisco del Rosario wrote
> "Gordon Ray Parker ICC nick is rndmndounsound"
>
> I replied
>
> The only player in "Lib rndmndounsound" up to 2000 was "Molton" and
> lets see:
>
> [Event "ICC 0 1"]
> [Site "Internet Chess Club"]
> [Date "2005.02.17"]
> [Round "?"]
> [White "Molton"]
> [Black "RndMndOUnsound"]
> [Result "0-1"]
> [ECO "A45"]
> [WhiteElo "2210"]
> [BlackElo "1721"]
> [PlyCount "76"]
> [EventDate "2005.??.??"]
>
> 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 Ne4 3. Bf4 g5 4. Be5 g4 5. Bxh8 Bh6 6. e3 Nxf2 7. Bd3
> Bxe3 8.Qf3 Nxh1 9. Qxg4 e6 10. Qh5 Ke7 11. Qxh7 Bf2+ 12. Kd1 Kd6
Is this game serious?? If so, I really don't understand moves 7 and 8.
Why was white trying to give up his queen and black so unwilling to
take it?
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: [email protected] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [email protected] - http://tony.mountifield.org
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 10:22:07
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Tony Mountifield <[email protected] > wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [Event "ICC 0 1"]
>>
>> 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 Ne4 3. Bf4 g5 4. Be5 g4 5. Bxh8 Bh6 6. e3 Nxf2 7. Bd3
>> Bxe3 8.Qf3 Nxh1 9. Qxg4 e6 10. Qh5 Ke7 11. Qxh7 Bf2+ 12. Kd1 Kd6
>
> Is this game serious??
No. Look at the time control: 1s per move.
Dave.
--
David Richerby Frozen Robot (TM): it's like a
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ high-tech robot but it's frozen in a
block of ice!
|
| | | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 12:20:26
From: Tony Mountifield
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
In article <xWb*[email protected] >,
David Richerby <[email protected] > wrote:
> Tony Mountifield <[email protected]> wrote:
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> [Event "ICC 0 1"]
> >>
> >> 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 Ne4 3. Bf4 g5 4. Be5 g4 5. Bxh8 Bh6 6. e3 Nxf2 7. Bd3
> >> Bxe3 8.Qf3 Nxh1 9. Qxg4 e6 10. Qh5 Ke7 11. Qxh7 Bf2+ 12. Kd1 Kd6
> >
> > Is this game serious??
>
> No. Look at the time control: 1s per move.
Ah, thanks. Didn't know that part of PGN.
I wouldn't even be able to move the pieces that fast, let alone decide
on a move! :-)
What happens if a TCP packet gets lost, and retried after 2 seconds?
I suppose you lose.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: [email protected] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [email protected] - http://tony.mountifield.org
|
| | | | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 14:31:54
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Tony Mountifield <[email protected] > wrote:
> David Richerby <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Tony Mountifield <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> [Event "ICC 0 1"]
>>>
>>> Is this game serious??
>>
>> No. Look at the time control: 1s per move.
>
> Ah, thanks. Didn't know that part of PGN.
Well, in this case, it's not really part of PGN: the Event header just
describes the event so you can put any meaningful data in there. There is
also a specific TimeControl header but that wasn't used in this example.
Dave.
--
David Richerby Addictive Radio (TM): it's like a
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ radio but you can never put it down!
|
| | | | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 08:28:11
From: Amarande
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Tony Mountifield wrote:
> What happens if a TCP packet gets lost, and retried after 2 seconds?
> I suppose you lose.
ICC has a feature called 'timestamp', which when used with a supported
client is designed to be used to deal with lag, to avoid people taking a
penalty to their time due to Internet problems.
However, on the other hand, it also has a feature called 'autoflag'
which causes a player to automatically forfeit his opponent when said
opponent runs out of time, if set.
I've been with ICC for awhile, but I am -not- quite sure how these two
work together ...
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 14:40:28
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
Aande <[email protected] > wrote:
> ICC has a feature called 'timestamp', which when used with a supported
> client is designed to be used to deal with lag, to avoid people taking a
> penalty to their time due to Internet problems.
>
> However, on the other hand, it also has a feature called 'autoflag'
> which causes a player to automatically forfeit his opponent when said
> opponent runs out of time, if set.
>
> I've been with ICC for awhile, but I am -not- quite sure how these two
> work together ...
FICS has the same features (except they call `timestamp', `timeseal').
I'm not sure how this is done actually done technically (I have several
plausible hypotheses) but when autoflag is set and timeseal is being used,
the user sees a message something like `Checking if [opponentname] is
really out of time.' If they were, you win; if they were lagging, the
clock runs negative for a little while and then pops back up positive when
the move is received.
I assume that what happens is that the server sends a message to the
opponent's client saying, `Oi! Are you still there?' If the client says,
`yes and I think I've still got x seconds left', the time-seal allows the
server to determine the lag; if the client hasn't responded after x
seconds, you know the lag is at least x so the best thing to do is adjourn
the game. Adjournments can be made without your opponent's consent if the
opponent is lagging by more than a certain amount.
Some people try to cheat by disconnecting from the net to avoid losing
lost games. Both FICS and ICC have options to make such disconnections
automatic forfeits (but then, if you disconnect for a legitimate reason,
like somebody tripping over your phone cable, you lose too). On FICS at
least, people who abuse by disconnecting will have their accounts flagged
to auto-forfeit on disconnection (without risk to their opponent). Also,
you can ask for immediate adjudication on games where there's an obvious
win and the opponent disconnected.
Dave.
--
David Richerby Psychotic Lotion (TM): it's like a
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ soothing hand lotion but it wants to
kill you!
|
| | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 09:16:14
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
<[email protected] > wrote:
> [Event "ICC 0 1"]
> [Site "Internet Chess Club"]
> [Date "2005.02.17"]
> [Round "?"]
> [White "Molton"]
> [Black "RndMndOUnsound"]
> [Result "0-1"]
> [ECO "A45"]
> [WhiteElo "2210"]
> [BlackElo "1721"]
>
> 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 Ne4 3. Bf4 g5 4. Be5 g4 5. Bxh8 Bh6 6. e3 Nxf2 7. Bd3
> Bxe3 8.Qf3 Nxh1 9. Qxg4 e6 10. Qh5 Ke7 {...} 0-1
>
> I'm sure no player made perfect moves in the first 10 moves in that
> game.
Well, 1.d4 isn't necessarily perfect but it's not really all that bad, you
know. It leads to reasonably playable positions, and Kasparov has shown
that it can even be a quite aggressive move.
Dave.
--
David Richerby Slimy Moistened Soap (TM): it's like
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ a personal hygiene product but it's
moist and covered in goo!
|
| |
Date: 30 Nov 2005 12:47:04
From: Terry
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
"FanofRayGordonswisdom" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:2005113011392416807%FanofRayGordonswisdom@fakeno...
> Does anybody here know Ray Gordons nick on ICC? I would like to play
> against this genius.
>
He has a blitz rating of around 1500.
Regards
|
| | |
Date: 01 Dec 2005 00:23:23
From: CeeBee
Subject: Re: Ray Gordons nick on ICC
|
"Terry" <[email protected] > wrote in rec.games.chess.analysis:
> He has a blitz rating of around 1500.
...and a host of nicks he uses to spam this group, including the message you
responded to.
--
CeeBee
***The Place Where The Faith And The Flavour Meet***
|
|
