| |
Main
Date: 14 Jul 2008 19:41:43
From: Old Haasie
Subject: Tough defense to crack
|
1.e4 e5; 2 Nf3 Qe7 .................. better than it looks. Does it
have a name?
|
|
| |
Date: 18 Jul 2008 17:55:46
From: Old Haasie
Subject: Re: Tough defense to crack
|
Black's 2... Qe7 costs him a tempo but little else. Black gets behind
in development only for a short while and in positions which white
cannot exploit to any grreat effect. Black eventually arrives at the
middle game fully equal. Remember ... black plays to keep a pawn on
e5 and one on c6. Once black plays a pawn to d6 he moves the BQ to
c7. It is a fairly easy defense to play and white gets little if any
advantage.
|
| |
Date: 19 Jul 2008 19:56:59
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Re: Tough defense to crack
|
> 1.e4 e5; 2 Nf3 Qe7 .................. better than it looks. Does it
> have a name?
>
Not sure, but there's no reason it should be fatal, as Qe7 is developing.
The problem is it restricts what Black can do, thus making it vulnerable to
prepared variations.
--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From
Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf
Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work. Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money they make
from what they teach.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
|
| |
Date: 15 Jul 2008 20:07:56
From: Ed Gaillard
Subject: Re: Tough defense to crack
|
In article <6a2ae912-f5fa-4a1a-98f3-4cb6c7ccb707@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com >,
Old Haasie <[email protected] > wrote:
>1.e4 e5; 2 Nf3 Qe7 .................. better than it looks. Does it
>have a name?
>
"Gunderam Defence" is the name I remembered from an old issue of
_Randspringer_, and a Google on that name turns up various references.
I see some coverage on (correspondence master) Jon Edwards's website,
starting at "http://www.queensac.com/gunderam.html", which suggests
why one might prefer the Philidor, and links to a small collection of
master games with the line. Enjoy!
-ed g.
--
Caissa have mercy on a miserable patzer: http://altergoniff.blogspot.com
|
| |
Date: 15 Jul 2008 12:32:44
From: Old Haasie
Subject: Re: Tough defense to crack
|
On Jul 15, 5:32=A0am, Martin Brown <
|
| |
Date:
From: Martin Brown
Subject: Re: Tough defense to crack
|
|
| | |
Date: 18 Jul 2008 12:13:54
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Tough defense to crack
|
Martin Brown <
|
|
