| |
Main
Date: 08 Apr 2008 03:51:43
From: samsloan
Subject: Joel Channing's Threats To Resign
|
Now, Joel Channing has posted to the USCF Issues Forum a statement
that he resigns effective immediately if the vote to cancel the
"Internet Insurance" passes. The problem with this is that at every
meeting while I was on the board, Channing said that he was
considering resigning. This is clearly part of his bullying tactics,
saying "If you don't do things my way, I am taking my ball and going
home".
Now, we are waiting to see if he is bluffing or if he really will
resign. As one wag has pointed out, he says that he wants his assets
protected, but he wants USCF Membership dues money used to protect his
assets. He should use his own money to protect his assets.
Here is what Channing has posted:
"I agree with your characterization of our potential liability as
probably a long shot. However, I'm surprised that you, as a horse
racing devotee, don't readily acknowledge that long shots tend to
produce big payoffs. As I've said before, my business is based on
minimizing risk in the pursuit of a big payoff, not a big payout! If
our actions or inactions were ever found by a jury to be the cause of
significant damage to the image and career of a high profile
personality, a jury award could easily be well into the millions. This
would mean that the financial health of the Federation itself, as well
as those of the directors, could be at risk. As I've also said before,
I could ignore the risk of loss if I were confident that any loss
would be a small one. In this case, however, I think you'd have to be
delusional not to acknowledge the possibility that a jury award might
be very big. Also, as we've seen, legal fees for high quality lawyers
can also scr*w up our budget.
"In short, I think it would be extremely imprudent to put my personal
assets, your assets and the assets of the Federation at risk of great
loss, no matter how small the potential for loss. I am in the business
of building, not losing, assets and that is what I came here to do. I
also think that before the board decides to accept the risk of going
"naked" with respect to cyber liability, the finance and LMA
committees should be consulted.
"As I told you last week, there'll be no hard feelings on my part if I
resign over this issue."
Third, my decision:
I hereby resign my seat on the USCF Board contingent on the Board's
passing a motion directing the Executive Director to cancel our
Internet Insurance.
Joel Channing
P.S.: If the motion carries and it turns out that the above statement
wasn't properly submitted, I'll simply resign unconditionally at that
time.
|
|
| |
Date: 10 Apr 2008 05:05:54
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Joel Channing's Threats To Resign
|
> Third, my decision:
>
> I hereby resign my seat on the USCF Board contingent on the Board's
> passing a motion directing the Executive Director to cancel our
> Internet Insurance.
>
> Joel Channing
>
> P.S.: If the motion carries and it turns out that the above statement
> wasn't properly submitted, I'll simply resign unconditionally at that
> time.
OK. The motion has now passed 4-1-2. Joel Channing says that he will
be resigning unconditionally. Several do-gooders are trying to talk
him out of resigning. I am hoping that he just goes away and does not
bother us any more.
Now, we will see whether he is a man of his word, or a mouse.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2008 11:35:15
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Joel Channing's Threats To Resign
|
[quote="DACP"][quote="nolan"]It is not an accurate report of the
Delegates Meeting to say that the Delegates voted to keep the Forums
open.
A Delegate motion to mandate closing the Forums failed, but that
failed vote does not bind the USCF to keeping the Forums open, as the
Delegates have not mandated that.
However, I think the Forums serve a useful, though too frequently
abused, purpose.[/quote]
Okay, Mike, I will agree with your depiction of the vote. However, a
motion failing to close the forums would seem to be a clear indication
that the delegates intention was to keep the forums open. If these
forums are closed down, it will be determined by others as to whether
that interpretation is an accurate one.[/quote]
It is also significant that at the Delegate's Meeting in Cherry Hill
there were only one or two votes to close down the Forum, one of them
being Joel Channing. The vote to keep this forum open was virtually
unanimous.
He and SP seem to be the only ones now who want to close down the USCF
Issues Forum.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2008 11:42:58
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Re: Joel Channing's Threats To Resign
|
:::::waits patiently:::::::::
|
|
