|
Main
Date: 19 May 2008 04:08:00
From: samsloan
Subject: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa What Polgar actually wrote seems reasonable unless one considers the fact that when they ran for election they knew that the board met four times a year and the most important part of their duties was that they would be expected to attend those four meeting. It was known months in advance that there would be a meeting this past weekend in Tulsa. No doubt some details were not provided but they knew that there would be a meeting. It is to be recalled that they announced that they would not be attending the first meeting of the board, which was held in Crossville, because of a "security breach". However, to everybody's surprise, they showed up anyway. That is where they were served with a summons and complaint. The second meeting was held online because Truong refused to travel to California to attend and Goichberg refused to travel to any other state because he was living in California at the time. Here is what Polgar (or Trollgar as they are known because it is impossible to tell which are written by Polgar and which are written by Truong) actually wrote explaining why she did not remain for another day in Tulsa so that she attend the third meeting, that was concluded in Tulsa yesterday: "A. Because the exact details were presented to us too late to make the proper arrangements. Randy Bauer complained about this as well. The details should have been given to all board members at least a month in advance and not a week or so. Some board members do not have children or just grown children. Their schedules are more flexible. "B. Many board members have attended the meetings by phone in the past. This is nothing unusual about this. I worry more about the state of the USCF and not this issue. I am currently on 3 non-profit boards and we do many of our meetings by phone with the other two. "We met Bill G., Bill H., Jim B., Pat Knight and others in Tulsa. The only 2 we did not meet were Randy Hough and Randy Bauer. Overall, the meeting went quite well I think. I think we covered a lot of issues which I believe will help the USCF. As I stated before, we obviously have a number of differences in opinion and some compromises were made. Most of the votes went 6-0 with a few minor abstentions. "There will be more discussions with Bill Hall and Bill Goichberg in the near future about increasing the USCF revenues via sponsorship, advertisement, and donation. It is up to them to accept our offer to help or not. "Susan Polgar"
|
|
|
Date: 22 May 2008 15:46:04
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
From: <[email protected] > Date: Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:52 AM Subject: Show me the money Frank K. Berry and Jim Berry made a generous offer to pay for a top of the line $7,500 a night hotel suite, $100,000 in appearance fees, a priceless chess set, 33% stock holdings in Stillwater National Bank, a spanking new Mercedes S-class, and many more incredible perks. All board members walked away from the meeting with a bag full of cash, gold Rolex, and so much more. Tell that someone who is asking to try running for the board himself. It is good to be a board member of the very rich USCF. Shhhhhh, but you must not leak this out to the general public. Otherwise, there would be nothing left for the rest of us in the future. On May 22, 10:39 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa > for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and > therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday > and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel > expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? > > Does anybody know the answer to this question? > > Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 22 May 2008 07:39:27
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? Does anybody know the answer to this question? Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 22 May 2008 17:10:16
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R.?=
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
"samsloan" <[email protected] > schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:5ac0a69e-8fba-451c-a11a-1486570c2486@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > Someone is asking the question: Since Polgar and Truong came to Tulsa > for three days during the US Championship but left Tulsa on Friday and > therefore did not attend the USCF Executive Board meeting on Saturday > and Sunday, did the USCF pay for their air transportation and hotel > expenses or did they come to Tulsa at their own expense? > > Does anybody know the answer to this question? Yes, several people are sure to know. Why don't you ask one of your many friends and admirers on the USCF staff? Or on the board?
|
|
Date: 19 May 2008 08:08:15
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa
|
Reasons Why Polgar Did not Stay for the Board Meeting in Tulsa What Polgar actually wrote seems reasonable unless one considers the fact that when they ran for election they knew that the board met four times a year and the most important part of their duties was that they would be expected to attend those four meeting. It was known months in advance that there would be a meeting this past weekend in Tulsa. No doubt some details were not provided but they knew that there would be a meeting. It is to be recalled that they announced that they would not be attending the first meeting of the board, which was held in Crossville, because of a "security breach". However, to everybody's surprise, they showed up anyway. That is where they were served with a summons and complaint. The second meeting was held online because Truong refused to travel to California to attend and Goichberg refused to travel to any other state because he was living in California at the time. Here is what Polgar (or Trollgar as they are known because it is impossible to tell which are written by Polgar and which are written by Truong) actually wrote explaining why she spent three days in Tulsa last week but did not remain for another day in Tulsa so that she could attend the third meeting that was concluded in Tulsa yesterday: "A. Because the exact details were presented to us too late to make the proper arrangements. Randy Bauer complained about this as well. The details should have been given to all board members at least a month in advance and not a week or so. Some board members do not have children or just grown children. Their schedules are more flexible. "B. Many board members have attended the meetings by phone in the past. This is nothing unusual about this. I worry more about the state of the USCF and not this issue. I am currently on 3 non-profit boards and we do many of our meetings by phone with the other two. "We met Bill G., Bill H., Jim B., Pat Knight and others in Tulsa. The only 2 we did not meet were Randy Hough and Randy Bauer. Overall, the meeting went quite well I think. I think we covered a lot of issues which I believe will help the USCF. As I stated before, we obviously have a number of differences in opinion and some compromises were made. Most of the votes went 6-0 with a few minor abstentions. "There will be more discussions with Bill Hall and Bill Goichberg in the near future about increasing the USCF revenues via sponsorship, advertisement, and donation. It is up to them to accept our offer to help or not. "Susan Polgar"
|
|