| |
Main
Date: 17 Mar 2007 17:21:36
From: Heywood Jablowme
Subject: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
"samsloan" < > I really wish I knew who this [email protected] is, or
what his
> agenda is.
>
You should file a lawsuit in your local circuit court (after consulting with
legal counsel) and then send subpoenas to the appropriate ISPs to find out
who your stalker is and get a restraining order against him or her.
You may not be able to get punitive damages, but you can certainly get your
attorney's fees, costs, and get the various ISPs to ban this abuser. You
will also be able to finally expose who he is on every forum, and make sure
that he is known and has a court judgment against him entered into his
credit report.
The person who is stalking you non-stop needs to be held accountable for his
psychotic stalking. This has been going on for at least a year, and it is
beyond abnormal. Any judge that reviews the thousands of malicious posts by
the fake sam sloan will probably order a psychological evaluation of your
stalker.
I suggest you find out from an attorney if you can get Discovery by filing
the lawsuit as a Domestic Violence Restraining Order under New York State's
Stalker Laws. If you file the case in the Domestic Violence (or Family
Court) then you can get psychological evaluations ordered.
The better alternative would be to print up all these posts and contact the
District Attorney's Office and find out if the maliciousness rises to the
level that justifies criminal prosecution. If the state files a criminal
case against your stalker then they can also order that he be evaluated for
mental illness as part of his pre-sentencing and/or probation report.
|
|
| |
Date: 17 Mar 2007 22:25:46
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
"Heywood Jablowme" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> "samsloan" <> I really wish I knew who this [email protected] is, or
> what his
>> agenda is.
>>
>
>
> You should file a lawsuit in your local circuit court (after consulting
> with
> legal counsel) and then send subpoenas to the appropriate ISPs to find out
> who your stalker is and get a restraining order against him or her.
Get real buddy. He would be wasting his time and money and nothing would
come of it. This is the reality of the internet, and usenet in particular.
People will pull pranks and impersonate all the time. There isn't a thing
you can do about it.
> You may not be able to get punitive damages, but you can certainly get
> your
> attorney's fees, costs, and get the various ISPs to ban this abuser.
Oh really? Do you have a clue how easy it is to be anonymous on the
internet? Do you even know what a proxy server is? Even serious crimes such
as corporate mainframe hacks and virus launches are rarely caught. You think
the FBI is going to subpoena someone's server because of misdemeanor
slander? Probably not, and even if they do it most likely won't lead
anywhere.
It's probably one of the losers with no life who posts here all the time
such as "SBD" or "Help-Bitch", but even a moron like that knows enough to
post anonymously.
JMR
|
| | |
Date: 17 Mar 2007 18:56:01
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
>> You should file a lawsuit in your local circuit court (after consulting
>> with
>> legal counsel) and then send subpoenas to the appropriate ISPs to find
>> out
>> who your stalker is and get a restraining order against him or her.
>
> Get real buddy. He would be wasting his time and money and nothing would
> come of it. This is the reality of the internet, and usenet in particular.
> People will pull pranks and impersonate all the time. There isn't a thing
> you can do about it.
I have every intention of unearthing the imposter once my employment lawsuit
against USCF gets going. That individual's identity is highly relevant to
my retaliation claim and you can bet I'll be doing everything I can within
my rights to unearth the identity.
I've subpoenaed AOL many times and know their exact process for discovery.
Come to think of it, I may file a pre-filing motion for this evidence in
order to preserve it as far back as I possibly can.
If the imposter thinks they can hide, they're delusional. Even without the
USCF case I could go after it myself for invasion of my privacy (which is
why you don't see them doing this to celebrities).
You can be sure if they impersonated a top American GM they'd be sued before
the next time they rebooted their computer.
--
Ray Gordon, Author
Price And Probability (The Value Handicapper's Bible)
http://www.cybersheet.com/horsepix.html
Would someone PLEASE become Ashlee Schull's new #1 fan? She deserves
better.
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Mar 2007 16:46:12
From:
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
On 17--2007, "Ray Gordon, Court Jester" <[email protected] > wrote:
> >> You should file a lawsuit in your local circuit court (after consulting
> >>
> >> with
> >> legal counsel) and then send subpoenas to the appropriate ISPs to find
> >> out
> >> who your stalker is and get a restraining order against him or her.
> >
> > Get real buddy. He would be wasting his time and money and nothing would
> >
> > come of it. This is the reality of the internet, and usenet in
> > particular.
> > People will pull pranks and impersonate all the time. There isn't a
> > thing
> > you can do about it.
>
> I have every intention of unearthing the imposter once my employment
> lawsuit against USCF gets going. That individual's identity is highly
> relevant to
> my retaliation claim and you can bet I'll be doing everything I can within
> my rights to unearth the identity.
>
As an investigator you suck.
> I've subpoenaed AOL many times and know their exact process for discovery.
I bet you do, having lost so many lawsuits and being ripped over it in the
first Wintermute suit
>
> Come to think of it, I may file a pre-filing motion for this evidence in
> order to preserve it as far back as I possibly can.
>
> If the imposter thinks they can hide, they're delusional. Even without
> the USCF case I could go after it myself for invasion of my privacy (which
> is
> why you don't see them doing this to celebrities).
>
You couldn't find a pink elephant in a wading pool. Which you have proved a
number of times.
> You can be sure if they impersonated a top American GM they'd be sued
> before the next time they rebooted their computer.
They have real lawyers, and real investigators. You have, um..YOU..
--
"serial and vexatious litigant in both the state and federal courts" Gordon
Roy Parker in his Memorandum Opposing Google's MTD
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Mar 2007 23:14:05
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]
>>> You should file a lawsuit in your local circuit court (after consulting
>>> with
>>> legal counsel) and then send subpoenas to the appropriate ISPs to find
>>> out
>>> who your stalker is and get a restraining order against him or her.
>>
>> Get real buddy. He would be wasting his time and money and nothing would
>> come of it. This is the reality of the internet, and usenet in
>> particular. People will pull pranks and impersonate all the time. There
>> isn't a thing you can do about it.
>
> I have every intention of unearthing the imposter once my employment
> lawsuit against USCF gets going. That individual's identity is highly
> relevant to my retaliation claim and you can bet I'll be doing everything
> I can within my rights to unearth the identity.
>
> I've subpoenaed AOL many times and know their exact process for discovery.
> Come to think of it, I may file a pre-filing motion for this evidence in
> order to preserve it as far back as I possibly can.
>
> If the imposter thinks they can hide, they're delusional. Even without
> the USCF case I could go after it myself for invasion of my privacy (which
> is why you don't see them doing this to celebrities).
>
> You can be sure if they impersonated a top American GM they'd be sued
> before the next time they rebooted their computer.
Oh really? I'll bet $1000 that I can impersonate, slander, ridicule, etc any
top GM of your choosing, for as long as I want and nothing whatsoever will
come of it, other than alot of whining and crying. We can put $1000 each
into escrow for the wager. Interested?
JMR
|
| | | | |
Date: 17 Mar 2007 16:58:34
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
On Sat, 17 2007 23:14:05 GMT, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:
>Oh really? I'll bet $1000 that I can impersonate, slander, ridicule, etc any
>top GM of your choosing, for as long as I want and nothing whatsoever will
>come of it, other than alot of whining and crying. We can put $1000 each
>into escrow for the wager. Interested?
>
>JMR
Another angle is that the posts appear intended to influence the board
elections and possibly some contracts of a non-profit corporation. If
the fake Sloan is someone who could financially benefit from the
results of his/her posts, the issue might go beyond slander of an
individual and be more similar to the stock pump-and-dump schemes that
involve Internet postings. I believe the originators of some of these
*have* been tracked down and prosecuted.
At any rate, given the number of obscene references to people well
known in the chess world, publicly outing the fake Sloan might provide
as much punishment as a financial penalty.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 18 Mar 2007 00:18:18
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
"Mike Murray" <[email protected] > wrote in message
> Another angle is that the posts appear intended to influence the board
> elections and possibly some contracts of a non-profit corporation. If
> the fake Sloan is someone who could financially benefit from the
> results of his/her posts,
ie, Randy Bauer? You'll recall the incident last year where Bauer got
caught red-handed trying to smear Sam Sloan with that filth he posted about
Susan Polgar.
JMR
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 17 Mar 2007 17:28:58
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
On Sun, 18 2007 00:18:18 GMT, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:
>
>"Mike Murray" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> Another angle is that the posts appear intended to influence the board
>> elections and possibly some contracts of a non-profit corporation. If
>> the fake Sloan is someone who could financially benefit from the
>> results of his/her posts,
>
>ie, Randy Bauer? You'll recall the incident last year where Bauer got
>caught red-handed trying to smear Sam Sloan with that filth he posted about
>Susan Polgar.
>
>JMR
Could you gimme a link or something to search on?
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 18 Mar 2007 00:43:51
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
"Mike Murray" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> On Sun, 18 2007 00:18:18 GMT, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mike Murray" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> Another angle is that the posts appear intended to influence the board
>>> elections and possibly some contracts of a non-profit corporation. If
>>> the fake Sloan is someone who could financially benefit from the
>>> results of his/her posts,
>>
>>ie, Randy Bauer? You'll recall the incident last year where Bauer got
>>caught red-handed trying to smear Sam Sloan with that filth he posted
>>about
>>Susan Polgar.
>>
>>JMR
>
> Could you gimme a link or something to search on?
You don't remember that chesswhore.blogspot.com scandel that Bauer got
caught pulling?
JMR
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 17 Mar 2007 17:57:39
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: Sloan must prosecute Stalker
|
On Sun, 18 2007 00:43:51 GMT, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:
>
>"Mike Murray" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]
>> On Sun, 18 2007 00:18:18 GMT, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Mike Murray" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> Another angle is that the posts appear intended to influence the board
>>>> elections and possibly some contracts of a non-profit corporation. If
>>>> the fake Sloan is someone who could financially benefit from the
>>>> results of his/her posts,
>>>
>>>ie, Randy Bauer? You'll recall the incident last year where Bauer got
>>>caught red-handed trying to smear Sam Sloan with that filth he posted
>>>about
>>>Susan Polgar.
>>>
>>>JMR
>>
>> Could you gimme a link or something to search on?
>
>You don't remember that chesswhore.blogspot.com scandel that Bauer got
>caught pulling?
>JMR
I'm amazed that site has been up for a year.
|
|
