| |
Main
Date: 01 Jan 2007 20:35:28
From: samsloan
Subject: Why does Mike Nolan defend Polgar?
|
That's a complete fabrication of what happened, Sam.
Don, Beatriz, Tim and I were there on Monday, we all went out to dinner
at a local Italian restaurant. (Al Lawrence was at that dinner, too.)
Paul and Susan didn't get there until some time around noon on Tuesday.
Mike Nolan
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Jan 2007 22:57:38
From:
Subject: Re: Why does Mike Nolan defend Polgar?
|
Was Mike Nolan ever Executive Director of the USCF?
cus Roberts
Alternate Delegate (WY)
Mike Nolan wrote:
> "samsloan" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> >That's a complete fabrication of what happened, Sam.
>
> >Don, Beatriz, Tim and I were there on Monday, we all went out to dinner
> >at a local Italian restaurant. (Al Lawrence was at that dinner, too.)
>
> >Paul and Susan didn't get there until some time around noon on Tuesday.
>
> Lots of people ask me why I'm defending you, it seems odd you claim
> I'm defending Susan.
>
> All I did was point out that your chronology of what happened in August
> of 2003 is dead wrong. If you cannot get basic facts right, how accurate
> are your implications of what might have happened?
> --
> Mike Nolan
|
| |
Date: 02 Jan 2007 05:09:36
From: Mike Nolan
Subject: Re: Why does Mike Nolan defend Polgar?
|
"samsloan" <[email protected] > writes:
>That's a complete fabrication of what happened, Sam.
>Don, Beatriz, Tim and I were there on Monday, we all went out to dinner
>at a local Italian restaurant. (Al Lawrence was at that dinner, too.)
>Paul and Susan didn't get there until some time around noon on Tuesday.
Lots of people ask me why I'm defending you, it seems odd you claim
I'm defending Susan.
All I did was point out that your chronology of what happened in August
of 2003 is dead wrong. If you cannot get basic facts right, how accurate
are your implications of what might have happened?
--
Mike Nolan
|
|
