| |
Main
Date: 07 Dec 2007 03:38:44
From: samsloan
Subject: Donna Announces Recall
|
Let the scorching begin. It means that I have absolutely zero - nada,
none - no reason whatsoever to politically ally myself with any person
currently on the USCF Executive Board. That's right...all the
political fields are being burned. I have absolutely no desire to play
business as usual with USCF. The forensic reports and the recall
petition will not be confined to just USCF's forums. In order to reach
USCF's membership, the recall petition will be publicized anywhere and
everywhere in the U.S. where chessplayers gather. Yes, this means that
USCF's reputation in the general public will go downhill before it
goes uphill. That's the collateral damage. If that's what it takes to
get chessplayers involved in the governance of USCF, so be it.
This issue began at the end of September. USCF has been damaged in the
public view and the USCF leadership pertaining to this issue has been
abyssmal. Instead of publicly requesting that Mr. Truong step aside
until the lawsuit was settled, USCF management chose to ask Mr.
Mottershead to step aside instead and he has taken a continuous
thrashing on these forums because of it. Instead of producing any sort
of information to the general membership, the Executive Board has been
silent. What was the intention - to wait years for the Sloan lawsuit
to wind its way through the courts?
Since Mr. Mottershead's report has now been validated in writing by a
forensic expert and a second written opinion is forthcoming, Mr.
Bauer, please advise if Mr. Mottershead may now accept his duties and
then he could fix the AOL problem you just complained about.
Mr. Bauer, please do explain whatever happened to USCF hiring the
forensic experts. The concerned members of USCF have taken enough of
an interest in this subject to have taken action on their own.
Ironically, I didn't even know that the report publicized today was
forthcoming. The report I anticipated from another expert should be
here by December 10 as promised.
Mr. Bauer, please explain why USCF is paying to defend Mr. Truong from
the lawsuit by Mr. Sloan. Why is his defense not severed. It is fairly
obvious that Mr. Truong's interests and USCF's interests are not the
same in this matter.
And Mr. Bauer, since Ms. Polgar is a personal friend of yours and you
were instrumental in persuading her to run for the Executive Board,
perhaps now you could be so kind as to persuade her husband that it
wwould be in USCF's best interests for him to resign.
Donna Alarie
Massachusetts Delegate
|
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2007 10:39:44
From:
Subject: Who Gives a Shit?
|
JHC
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2007 14:30:32
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Donna Announces Recall
|
On Dec 7, 1:04 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 7, 5:38 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Let the scorching begin. It means that I have absolutely zero - nada,
> > none - no reason whatsoever to politically ally myself with any person
> > currently on the USCF Executive Board. That's right...all the
> > political fields are being burned. I have absolutely no desire to play
> > business as usual with USCF. The forensic reports and the recall
> > petition will not be confined to just USCF's forums. In order to reach
> > USCF's membership, the recall petition will be publicized anywhere and
> > everywhere in the U.S. where chessplayers gather. Yes, this means that
> > USCF's reputation in the general public will go downhill before it
> > goes uphill. That's the collateral damage. If that's what it takes to
> > get chessplayers involved in the governance of USCF, so be it.
>
> > This issue began at the end of September. USCF has been damaged in the
> > public view and the USCF leadership pertaining to this issue has been
> > abyssmal. Instead of publicly requesting that Mr. Truong step aside
> > until the lawsuit was settled, USCF management chose to ask Mr.
> > Mottershead to step aside instead and he has taken a continuous
> > thrashing on these forums because of it. Instead of producing any sort
> > of information to the general membership, the Executive Board has been
> > silent. What was the intention - to wait years for the Sloan lawsuit
> > to wind its way through the courts?
>
> > Since Mr. Mottershead's report has now been validated in writing by a
> > forensic expert and a second written opinion is forthcoming, Mr.
> > Bauer, please advise if Mr. Mottershead may now accept his duties and
> > then he could fix the AOL problem you just complained about.
>
> > Mr. Bauer, please do explain whatever happened to USCF hiring the
> > forensic experts. The concerned members of USCF have taken enough of
> > an interest in this subject to have taken action on their own.
> > Ironically, I didn't even know that the report publicized today was
> > forthcoming. The report I anticipated from another expert should be
> > here by December 10 as promised.
>
> > Mr. Bauer, please explain why USCF is paying to defend Mr. Truong from
> > the lawsuit by Mr. Sloan. Why is his defense not severed. It is fairly
> > obvious that Mr. Truong's interests and USCF's interests are not the
> > same in this matter.
>
> > And Mr. Bauer, since Ms. Polgar is a personal friend of yours and you
> > were instrumental in persuading her to run for the Executive Board,
> > perhaps now you could be so kind as to persuade her husband that it
> > wwould be in USCF's best interests for him to resign.
>
> > Donna Alarie
> > Massachusetts Delegate
>
> I have a certified letter from the USCF ethics committee in relation
> to Glen Peterson and this matter.
> I will be filing and posting an AMENDED ethics complaint against Paul
> Troung with the USCF
> ethics committee, asking for the explusion of Paul Troung and Susan
> Polgar from the US CHess
> Federation.
>
> Donna, be careful of the police. I see evidence that Glen Peterson is
> preparing to call the cops to the next meeting
> of the Delegates to have you ARRESTED!
>
> cus Roberts
Stop hijacking threads!
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2007 13:19:37
From:
Subject: Who Gives a Shit?
|
JHC
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2007 10:04:10
From:
Subject: Re: Donna Announces Recall
|
On Dec 7, 5:38 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> Let the scorching begin. It means that I have absolutely zero - nada,
> none - no reason whatsoever to politically ally myself with any person
> currently on the USCF Executive Board. That's right...all the
> political fields are being burned. I have absolutely no desire to play
> business as usual with USCF. The forensic reports and the recall
> petition will not be confined to just USCF's forums. In order to reach
> USCF's membership, the recall petition will be publicized anywhere and
> everywhere in the U.S. where chessplayers gather. Yes, this means that
> USCF's reputation in the general public will go downhill before it
> goes uphill. That's the collateral damage. If that's what it takes to
> get chessplayers involved in the governance of USCF, so be it.
>
> This issue began at the end of September. USCF has been damaged in the
> public view and the USCF leadership pertaining to this issue has been
> abyssmal. Instead of publicly requesting that Mr. Truong step aside
> until the lawsuit was settled, USCF management chose to ask Mr.
> Mottershead to step aside instead and he has taken a continuous
> thrashing on these forums because of it. Instead of producing any sort
> of information to the general membership, the Executive Board has been
> silent. What was the intention - to wait years for the Sloan lawsuit
> to wind its way through the courts?
>
> Since Mr. Mottershead's report has now been validated in writing by a
> forensic expert and a second written opinion is forthcoming, Mr.
> Bauer, please advise if Mr. Mottershead may now accept his duties and
> then he could fix the AOL problem you just complained about.
>
> Mr. Bauer, please do explain whatever happened to USCF hiring the
> forensic experts. The concerned members of USCF have taken enough of
> an interest in this subject to have taken action on their own.
> Ironically, I didn't even know that the report publicized today was
> forthcoming. The report I anticipated from another expert should be
> here by December 10 as promised.
>
> Mr. Bauer, please explain why USCF is paying to defend Mr. Truong from
> the lawsuit by Mr. Sloan. Why is his defense not severed. It is fairly
> obvious that Mr. Truong's interests and USCF's interests are not the
> same in this matter.
>
> And Mr. Bauer, since Ms. Polgar is a personal friend of yours and you
> were instrumental in persuading her to run for the Executive Board,
> perhaps now you could be so kind as to persuade her husband that it
> wwould be in USCF's best interests for him to resign.
>
> Donna Alarie
> Massachusetts Delegate
I have a certified letter from the USCF ethics committee in relation
to Glen Peterson and this matter.
I will be filing and posting an AMENDED ethics complaint against Paul
Troung with the USCF
ethics committee, asking for the explusion of Paul Troung and Susan
Polgar from the US CHess
Federation.
Donna, be careful of the police. I see evidence that Glen Peterson is
preparing to call the cops to the next meeting
of the Delegates to have you ARRESTED!
cus Roberts
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2007 10:01:59
From: RufusZ
Subject: Re: Where's Gordon Roy Parker!????
|
On Dec 7, 7:01 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
<[email protected] > wrote:
> Dang.
>
> --
> Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guruhttp://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
> Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
>
> Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
>
> Don't rely on overexposed, mass-keted commercial seduction methods which
> no longer work.
>
> Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
>
> Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
> contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
> targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
> their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2007 05:29:26
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Donna Announces Recall
|
I think that Donna might consider trying to recall Bill Goichberg as
well.
Goichberg has been constantly attacking me for the last two years
without any reason that I know of, while continuing to defend and
protect Polgar and Truong, all this time doing little as president for
the benefit of the USCF other than to advance his own interests.
He should have thrown out Truong like a dead rat. Instead, he is
protecting him while appointing a "Moderation Committee" of people
known to be antagonistic to me.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2007 04:08:13
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Donna Announces Recall
|
On Dec 7, 6:38 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> Let the scorching begin. It means that I have absolutely zero - nada,
> none - no reason whatsoever to politically ally myself with any person
> currently on the USCF Executive Board. That's right...all the
> political fields are being burned. I have absolutely no desire to play
> business as usual with USCF. The forensic reports and the recall
> petition will not be confined to just USCF's forums. In order to reach
> USCF's membership, the recall petition will be publicized anywhere and
> everywhere in the U.S. where chessplayers gather. Yes, this means that
> USCF's reputation in the general public will go downhill before it
> goes uphill. That's the collateral damage. If that's what it takes to
> get chessplayers involved in the governance of USCF, so be it.
>
> This issue began at the end of September. USCF has been damaged in the
> public view and the USCF leadership pertaining to this issue has been
> abyssmal. Instead of publicly requesting that Mr. Truong step aside
> until the lawsuit was settled, USCF management chose to ask Mr.
> Mottershead to step aside instead and he has taken a continuous
> thrashing on these forums because of it. Instead of producing any sort
> of information to the general membership, the Executive Board has been
> silent. What was the intention - to wait years for the Sloan lawsuit
> to wind its way through the courts?
>
> Since Mr. Mottershead's report has now been validated in writing by a
> forensic expert and a second written opinion is forthcoming, Mr.
> Bauer, please advise if Mr. Mottershead may now accept his duties and
> then he could fix the AOL problem you just complained about.
>
> Mr. Bauer, please do explain whatever happened to USCF hiring the
> forensic experts. The concerned members of USCF have taken enough of
> an interest in this subject to have taken action on their own.
> Ironically, I didn't even know that the report publicized today was
> forthcoming. The report I anticipated from another expert should be
> here by December 10 as promised.
>
> Mr. Bauer, please explain why USCF is paying to defend Mr. Truong from
> the lawsuit by Mr. Sloan. Why is his defense not severed. It is fairly
> obvious that Mr. Truong's interests and USCF's interests are not the
> same in this matter.
>
> And Mr. Bauer, since Ms. Polgar is a personal friend of yours and you
> were instrumental in persuading her to run for the Executive Board,
> perhaps now you could be so kind as to persuade her husband that it
> wwould be in USCF's best interests for him to resign.
>
> Donna Alarie
> Massachusetts Delegate
Will Ray Gordon please start his own threads and not hijack this one?
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2007 07:01:41
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Where's BILL!????
|
Dang.
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-keted commercial seduction methods which
no longer work.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
|
|
