Main
Date: 02 Jan 2008 22:46:48
From: samsloan
Subject: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation
by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:09 pm #85534

OK, so 6 people have a higher level sanction-- so what. I still have a
problem with it. I have been placed in a very defensive posture by
what the FOC and moderators are allowing. My USCF award was ridiculed.
If you believe in certain posters, the only reason why I got it is due
to a political favor from Susan Polgar. Ron, Hal, and Brian
Mottershead ridiculed my work; and insinuated several things on
multiple occasions without any shred of proof. After I respond to the
insinuations and stated that they are untrue; they are allowed to
continue to ridicule and insinuate.

Steve in Ten, one of our better posters here, called me a 'loon'.
Harry has often stated that I made 'vile attacks' against Dr. Jones.
Furthermore, Ron and Harry stated that they don't think that I was
honest when I stated that I never said, or inferred that I represent
the USCF when I made the call to Mr. Jones. I called Mr. Jones, and
was very upfront with the guy, yet my word is not to be believed. My
answers are not enough for them, and they will make sure to point it
out. Other 'questions' were allowed, such as 'your site has a bad
alexa rating, but somehow you got at least one brilliant idea to use
college chess in your url which is the only thing that makes your
sparse site ranking high', and when that does not work, I have been
accused of stealing the USCF colors to make a different site. When
that gets old, people can complain about how I am moderating a
different site.

I don't mind responding to a few of these issues, such is life, but in
the last two months I have been subject to all sorts of attack. Did
Ron get sanctioned? Did Harry? What about Hal? No, they did not get
banned. Brian M. got a level one for one of his attacks, but many of
his posts still show. Can Steve call a member a 'loon'? It appears so
since his post has not been pulled. But, when I respond to the
attacks, sometimes in a similiar tone, it is a fact that I will be
sanctioned for it.

Yes, I do have a problem with this and I believe that the whole one-
sided tone of this forum is quite unfair.
Last edited by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in
total.
Gregory Alexander

http://www.collegechess.org
http://www.chessdiscussion.com




 
Date: 04 Jan 2008 10:10:11
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation
Here is the posting that, according to Gregory Alexander, got him
banned. He posted this to his own moderated forum, chessdiscussion.com
(Please note that the term "sick fantasies" applies not to me, the
Real Sam Sloan, but to the Fake Sam Sloan):

by gregory on Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:36 am
I recevied my 2nd ban in the USCF Forusm for the following post.

gregory wrote:

artichoke wrote:

gregory wrote:I agree. The RGCP is a cesspool, it matters
not whom is currently posting there.


You are not required to like RGCP, but it's a whole lot less
of a cesspool now than when FSS held sway there.

As I remember, it was better still five or more years ago,
before FSS ever shared those sick fantasies with us.



Whoa David... 'sick fantasies'? Aren't you a supporter of Sam
Sloan?

Hey, you can support anyone that you would like, but if you are
going to try to be judgemental regarding 'sick fantasies' (your
words), maybe you should stick closer to home.

On another note; I heard that you are now on the USCF ratings
committee, is this true?



After the post was pulled, I followed up with:

gregory wrote:David has shown that he has thick skin regarding the
writings of Sam Sloan and I am surprised that he would be 'sickened'
by the writings of the FSS. I find the two authors to be
indistinguishable.



There are far worse posts in the USCF Forum, but then again,
unfortunately; the forums are designed to be moderated from an anti-
Polgar/Troung political view.
Gregory

ChessDiscussion webmaster


  
Date: 05 Jan 2008 00:01:51
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation
In article <[email protected]m >
samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
>
> Here is the posting that, according to Gregory Alexander,

Once again, the Real Fake Sam Sloan has concocted an entire
thread of his pseudonyms, including Gregory. I just want
to reiterate how sorry I am about instigating this ridiculous
lawsuit and I would like apologize to Paul Truong and Susan
Polgar.

Sam Sloan (The Real One)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.




 
Date: 03 Jan 2008 23:23:29
From:
Subject: Re: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation
On Jan 3, 4:28=A0am, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> "Javert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]m...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 1:46 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:09 pm #85534
>
> >> OK, so 6 people have a higher level sanction-- so what. I still have a
> >> problem with it. I have been placed in a very defensive posture by
> >> what the FOC and moderators are allowing. My USCF award was ridiculed.
> >> If you believe in certain posters, the only reason why I got it is due
> >> to a political favor from Susan Polgar. Ron, Hal, and Brian
> >> Mottershead ridiculed my work; and insinuated several things on
> >> multiple occasions without any shred of proof. After I respond to the
> >> insinuations and stated that they are untrue; they are allowed to
> >> continue to ridicule and insinuate.
>
> >> Steve in Ten, one of our better posters here, called me a 'loon'.
> >> Harry has often stated that I made 'vile attacks' against Dr. Jones.
> >> Furthermore, Ron and Harry stated that they don't think that I was
> >> honest when I stated that I never said, or inferred that I represent
> >> the USCF when I made the call to Mr. Jones. I called Mr. Jones, and
> >> was very upfront with the guy, yet my word is not to be believed. My
> >> answers are not enough for them, and they will make sure to point it
> >> out. Other 'questions' were allowed, such as 'your site has a bad
> >> alexa rating, but somehow you got at least one brilliant idea to use
> >> college chess in your url which is the only thing that makes your
> >> sparse site ranking high', and when that does not work, I have been
> >> accused of stealing the USCF colors to make a different site. When
> >> that gets old, people can complain about how I am moderating a
> >> different site.
>
> >> I don't mind responding to a few of these issues, such is life, but in
> >> the last two months I have been subject to all sorts of attack. Did
> >> Ron get sanctioned? Did Harry? What about Hal? No, they did not get
> >> banned. Brian M. got a level one for one of his attacks, but many of
> >> his posts still show. Can Steve call a member a 'loon'? It appears so
> >> since his post has not been pulled. But, when I respond to the
> >> attacks, sometimes in a similiar tone, it is a fact that I will be
> >> sanctioned for it.
>
> >> Yes, I do have a problem with this and I believe that the whole one-
> >> sided tone of this forum is quite unfair.
> >> Last edited by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in
> >> total.
> >> Gregory Alexander
>
> >>http://www.collegechess.orghttp://www.chessdiscussion.com
>
> > Greg needs to grow up and quit playing the victim.
>
> Wrong. =A0While I don't see eye to eye with Gregory on a number of issues,=
in
> this instance he is correct in complaining about how the USCF Issues Forum=

> is being moderated.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Brian

I intend to close the USCF forums. I don't think that a group of
organized child molesters deserve to have a private
forum to assist in violations of the Mann Act. I intend to put child
molesters where they belong: PRISION. The first
step is closure of the USCF Forums.

Step 2: Background Checks to prevent molestation in Schools

Frequently, sex offenders ask for Susan Polgar's help or Paul Truong's
help. Sex offenders are welcome
to post on the forums, to go into the schools, and to molest children.

It is time to end this company, once and for all.

All we need is a way for US players to compete in the World Chess
Championship. Enough of the needs of the kiddie
fuckers and Susan Polgar.

Step 3: Dissoution or Bankruptcy of the kiddie fucker corproate shell


GAME OVER

cus Roberts


 
Date: 03 Jan 2008 07:17:57
From: Javert
Subject: Re: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation
On Jan 3, 5:28=A0am, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> "Javert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]m...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 1:46 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:09 pm #85534
>
> >> OK, so 6 people have a higher level sanction-- so what. I still have a
> >> problem with it. I have been placed in a very defensive posture by
> >> what the FOC and moderators are allowing. My USCF award was ridiculed.
> >> If you believe in certain posters, the only reason why I got it is due
> >> to a political favor from Susan Polgar. Ron, Hal, and Brian
> >> Mottershead ridiculed my work; and insinuated several things on
> >> multiple occasions without any shred of proof. After I respond to the
> >> insinuations and stated that they are untrue; they are allowed to
> >> continue to ridicule and insinuate.
>
> >> Steve in Ten, one of our better posters here, called me a 'loon'.
> >> Harry has often stated that I made 'vile attacks' against Dr. Jones.
> >> Furthermore, Ron and Harry stated that they don't think that I was
> >> honest when I stated that I never said, or inferred that I represent
> >> the USCF when I made the call to Mr. Jones. I called Mr. Jones, and
> >> was very upfront with the guy, yet my word is not to be believed. My
> >> answers are not enough for them, and they will make sure to point it
> >> out. Other 'questions' were allowed, such as 'your site has a bad
> >> alexa rating, but somehow you got at least one brilliant idea to use
> >> college chess in your url which is the only thing that makes your
> >> sparse site ranking high', and when that does not work, I have been
> >> accused of stealing the USCF colors to make a different site. When
> >> that gets old, people can complain about how I am moderating a
> >> different site.
>
> >> I don't mind responding to a few of these issues, such is life, but in
> >> the last two months I have been subject to all sorts of attack. Did
> >> Ron get sanctioned? Did Harry? What about Hal? No, they did not get
> >> banned. Brian M. got a level one for one of his attacks, but many of
> >> his posts still show. Can Steve call a member a 'loon'? It appears so
> >> since his post has not been pulled. But, when I respond to the
> >> attacks, sometimes in a similiar tone, it is a fact that I will be
> >> sanctioned for it.
>
> >> Yes, I do have a problem with this and I believe that the whole one-
> >> sided tone of this forum is quite unfair.
> >> Last edited by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in
> >> total.
> >> Gregory Alexander
>
> >>http://www.collegechess.orghttp://www.chessdiscussion.com
>
> > Greg needs to grow up and quit playing the victim.
>
> Wrong. =A0While I don't see eye to eye with Gregory on a number of issues,=
in
> this instance he is correct in complaining about how the USCF Issues Forum=

> is being moderated.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No, I stand by what I say. I'm not wrong. He has played the victim
from almost day one when he cried that Mottershead fixed his problem
by temporarily logging in as him.


 
Date: 03 Jan 2008 03:23:14
From:
Subject: Re: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation
On Jan 3, 4:28=A0am, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> "Javert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]m...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 1:46 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:09 pm #85534
>
> >> OK, so 6 people have a higher level sanction-- so what. I still have a
> >> problem with it. I have been placed in a very defensive posture by
> >> what the FOC and moderators are allowing. My USCF award was ridiculed.
> >> If you believe in certain posters, the only reason why I got it is due
> >> to a political favor from Susan Polgar. Ron, Hal, and Brian
> >> Mottershead ridiculed my work; and insinuated several things on
> >> multiple occasions without any shred of proof. After I respond to the
> >> insinuations and stated that they are untrue; they are allowed to
> >> continue to ridicule and insinuate.
>
> >> Steve in Ten, one of our better posters here, called me a 'loon'.
> >> Harry has often stated that I made 'vile attacks' against Dr. Jones.
> >> Furthermore, Ron and Harry stated that they don't think that I was
> >> honest when I stated that I never said, or inferred that I represent
> >> the USCF when I made the call to Mr. Jones. I called Mr. Jones, and
> >> was very upfront with the guy, yet my word is not to be believed. My
> >> answers are not enough for them, and they will make sure to point it
> >> out. Other 'questions' were allowed, such as 'your site has a bad
> >> alexa rating, but somehow you got at least one brilliant idea to use
> >> college chess in your url which is the only thing that makes your
> >> sparse site ranking high', and when that does not work, I have been
> >> accused of stealing the USCF colors to make a different site. When
> >> that gets old, people can complain about how I am moderating a
> >> different site.
>
> >> I don't mind responding to a few of these issues, such is life, but in
> >> the last two months I have been subject to all sorts of attack. Did
> >> Ron get sanctioned? Did Harry? What about Hal? No, they did not get
> >> banned. Brian M. got a level one for one of his attacks, but many of
> >> his posts still show. Can Steve call a member a 'loon'? It appears so
> >> since his post has not been pulled. But, when I respond to the
> >> attacks, sometimes in a similiar tone, it is a fact that I will be
> >> sanctioned for it.
>
> >> Yes, I do have a problem with this and I believe that the whole one-
> >> sided tone of this forum is quite unfair.
> >> Last edited by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in
> >> total.
> >> Gregory Alexander
>
> >>http://www.collegechess.orghttp://www.chessdiscussion.com
>
> > Greg needs to grow up and quit playing the victim.
>
> Wrong. =A0While I don't see eye to eye with Gregory on a number of issues,=
in
> this instance he is correct in complaining about how the USCF Issues Forum=

> is being moderated.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I want a chess lawyer. I am having some very difficult negotiations
with FIDE, and I can't post to the forums.
EVeryone is going to suffer.

cus Roberts
Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE


 
Date: 03 Jan 2008 00:24:20
From: Javert
Subject: Re: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation
On Jan 3, 1:46 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:09 pm #85534
>
> OK, so 6 people have a higher level sanction-- so what. I still have a
> problem with it. I have been placed in a very defensive posture by
> what the FOC and moderators are allowing. My USCF award was ridiculed.
> If you believe in certain posters, the only reason why I got it is due
> to a political favor from Susan Polgar. Ron, Hal, and Brian
> Mottershead ridiculed my work; and insinuated several things on
> multiple occasions without any shred of proof. After I respond to the
> insinuations and stated that they are untrue; they are allowed to
> continue to ridicule and insinuate.
>
> Steve in Ten, one of our better posters here, called me a 'loon'.
> Harry has often stated that I made 'vile attacks' against Dr. Jones.
> Furthermore, Ron and Harry stated that they don't think that I was
> honest when I stated that I never said, or inferred that I represent
> the USCF when I made the call to Mr. Jones. I called Mr. Jones, and
> was very upfront with the guy, yet my word is not to be believed. My
> answers are not enough for them, and they will make sure to point it
> out. Other 'questions' were allowed, such as 'your site has a bad
> alexa rating, but somehow you got at least one brilliant idea to use
> college chess in your url which is the only thing that makes your
> sparse site ranking high', and when that does not work, I have been
> accused of stealing the USCF colors to make a different site. When
> that gets old, people can complain about how I am moderating a
> different site.
>
> I don't mind responding to a few of these issues, such is life, but in
> the last two months I have been subject to all sorts of attack. Did
> Ron get sanctioned? Did Harry? What about Hal? No, they did not get
> banned. Brian M. got a level one for one of his attacks, but many of
> his posts still show. Can Steve call a member a 'loon'? It appears so
> since his post has not been pulled. But, when I respond to the
> attacks, sometimes in a similiar tone, it is a fact that I will be
> sanctioned for it.
>
> Yes, I do have a problem with this and I believe that the whole one-
> sided tone of this forum is quite unfair.
> Last edited by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in
> total.
> Gregory Alexander
>
> http://www.collegechess.orghttp://www.chessdiscussion.com

Greg needs to grow up and quit playing the victim.


  
Date: 03 Jan 2008 10:28:07
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Gregory Alexander Complains about USCF Issues Forum Moderation

"Javert" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]m...
> On Jan 3, 1:46 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:09 pm #85534
>>
>> OK, so 6 people have a higher level sanction-- so what. I still have a
>> problem with it. I have been placed in a very defensive posture by
>> what the FOC and moderators are allowing. My USCF award was ridiculed.
>> If you believe in certain posters, the only reason why I got it is due
>> to a political favor from Susan Polgar. Ron, Hal, and Brian
>> Mottershead ridiculed my work; and insinuated several things on
>> multiple occasions without any shred of proof. After I respond to the
>> insinuations and stated that they are untrue; they are allowed to
>> continue to ridicule and insinuate.
>>
>> Steve in Ten, one of our better posters here, called me a 'loon'.
>> Harry has often stated that I made 'vile attacks' against Dr. Jones.
>> Furthermore, Ron and Harry stated that they don't think that I was
>> honest when I stated that I never said, or inferred that I represent
>> the USCF when I made the call to Mr. Jones. I called Mr. Jones, and
>> was very upfront with the guy, yet my word is not to be believed. My
>> answers are not enough for them, and they will make sure to point it
>> out. Other 'questions' were allowed, such as 'your site has a bad
>> alexa rating, but somehow you got at least one brilliant idea to use
>> college chess in your url which is the only thing that makes your
>> sparse site ranking high', and when that does not work, I have been
>> accused of stealing the USCF colors to make a different site. When
>> that gets old, people can complain about how I am moderating a
>> different site.
>>
>> I don't mind responding to a few of these issues, such is life, but in
>> the last two months I have been subject to all sorts of attack. Did
>> Ron get sanctioned? Did Harry? What about Hal? No, they did not get
>> banned. Brian M. got a level one for one of his attacks, but many of
>> his posts still show. Can Steve call a member a 'loon'? It appears so
>> since his post has not been pulled. But, when I respond to the
>> attacks, sometimes in a similiar tone, it is a fact that I will be
>> sanctioned for it.
>>
>> Yes, I do have a problem with this and I believe that the whole one-
>> sided tone of this forum is quite unfair.
>> Last edited by gregory on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in
>> total.
>> Gregory Alexander
>>
>> http://www.collegechess.orghttp://www.chessdiscussion.com
>
> Greg needs to grow up and quit playing the victim.

Wrong. While I don't see eye to eye with Gregory on a number of issues, in
this instance he is correct in complaining about how the USCF Issues Forum
is being moderated.