Main
Date: 28 Oct 2008 16:18:12
From: samsloan
Subject: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
__________________________________________

Sam Sloan,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 07-CV-8537 (DC)
-against-

Hoainhan =93Paul=94 Truong, Zsuzsanna =93Susan=94 Polgar, Joel Channing,
William Goichberg, The United States Chess Federation, Bill Hall,
Herbert Rodney Vaughn, Gregory Alexander, Frank Niro, Grant Perks,
William Brock, Randall Hough, Randy Bauer, Jim Berry, Texas Tech
University and United States of America,

Defendants
__________________________________________

SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
THIS COURTS ORDER DATED OCTOBER 1, 2008 WHICH DENIED RECONSIDERATION
OF THE JUDGMENT DISMISSING THIS COMPLAINT
__________________________________________

STATE OF NEW YORK )
ss:
COUNTY OF BRONX )

Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of this
court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration of
the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action. I time
stamped it on October 3. I put it in the drop box of the Worth Street
entrance to the Courthouse at about 7:00 PM that evening, as the main
entrance to the courthouse was closed. I was told that this was the
proper way to do it, but nevertheless my October 3 motion has never
appeared on the docket sheet. Therefore, I refiled the same motion on
October 7, 2008. It was denied the same day. I suspect that the court
had received the October 3 motion even though it was never docketed.

2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9,
2008. That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed. I have called
the pro se clerk and have been told that this is normal, as these
things take time and that my appeal is OK.

3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a new
development which impacts this case, which is that on October 24, 2008
a new related case was filed in the San Francisco Superior Court
between the defendants to this case, in that two of the defendants are
suing two of the other defendants. The new lawsuit is entitled United
States of America Chess Federation vs. Susan Polgar, Case Number
CGC-08-476777.

4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the
defendants would start suing each other and now this has happened. The
two plaintiffs, the United States Chess Federation and Randall Hough,
are suing two defendants here, Susan Polgar and Gregory Alexander,
alleging that the defendants entered into the email boxes of Randall
Hough, a member of the board of the United States Chess Federation,
and stole the emails that were received from counsel and published
those stolen emails on the Internet.

5. It is to be recalled that one counsel, Proskauer Rose, initially
represented all of the USCF Defendants but later Proskauer Rose
withdrew from representing two of the defendants, Susan Polgar and
Paul Truong, so Polgar and Truong were assigned new counsel.

6. Now, the new San Francisco complaint alleges that Polgar and
Alexander broke into the mailboxes of other defendants in order to
learn their defense strategy in this case. I think that opposing
counsel here may be interested to learn that their confidential
communications with their clients may have been compromised.

7. The new complaint charges Polgar and Alexander with violations of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC =A7 2510 et seq. and
18 USC =A7 2710 et seq. and a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse
Act, 18 USC =A7 1030. The complaint also charges Susan Polgar and
Gregory Alexander with Computer Fraud under the Comprehensive Computer
Data and Access Act, California Penal Code Section 502 (c) and (e).
The complaint demands statutory damages pursuant to 18 USC =A7 2520 (c)
(2)(B) plus one million dollars in punitive damages plus various
injunctive and other relief.

8. Thus far, there are six cases pending in four different states
around the country all pertaining to the same factual situation here
of Truong and Polgar winning USCF election by impersonating me and
others. Now they are accused of stealing the emails by other
defendants to learn their litigation strategy. From what I understand,
there is another new related case about to be filed in yet a different
state. I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have
Susan Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary. I am
not doing any of this. The only case I have filed is the one before
this court. All of those other proceedings are being filed by other
defendants here.

9. Attached hereto is a copy of the complaint filed last Friday in the
San Francisco Superior Court. The attorney filing the case, Karl
Kronenberger, is a recognized authority on this area of Internet law.
He has appeared on NBC and CNN News in that capacity. I think that
Susan Polgar made a serious blunder in suing him, as he is a former
federal prosecutor. I am also attaching a copy of the affidavit I
filed yesterday in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Texas concerning this matter. Susan Polgar has stated on
her website about the Texas case, =93this lawsuit will proceed all the
way. Enough is enough. This has gone on long enough.=94

10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
already appealed. However, I feel that I must inform this court plus
opposing counsel of these new developments. In addition, I believe
that I am entitled to file this to establish a record for my appeal
which has not yet been docketed, especially since I am not allowed to
file in the Second Circuit yet.

WHEREFORE, my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the
decision and judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.


_______________________
Samuel H. Sloan
1664 Davidson Ave., Apt. 1B
Bronx NY 10453-7877

1-917-507-7226
1-917-659-3397
[email protected]
STATE OF NEW YORK )
ss:
COUNTY OF BRONX )
VERIFICATION

1, the undersigned, the petitioner named in the foregoing petition,
being duly sworn, says: I have read the foregoing petition subscribed
by me and know the contents thereof and the same is true of my own
knowledge, except as to those matters herein stated to be alleged upon
information and belief and as to those matters I believe it to be
true.

__________________________________
Signature of Plaintiff

On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel H.
Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who executed
the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrument
before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.

_____________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC




 
Date: 29 Oct 2008 14:21:21
From:
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong


B. Lafferty wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > samsloan wrote:
> >> 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
> >> reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
> >> already appealed. However, I feel that I must inform this court plus
> >> opposing counsel of these new developments. In addition, I believe
> >> that I am entitled to file this to establish a record for my appeal
> >> which has not yet been docketed, especially since I am not allowed to
> >> file in the Second Circuit yet.
> >
> >
> > Then why are you wasting the court's time and the taxpayer's money?
> > Doofus. The legal system is not there to serve as a playground for
> > malignant narcissists.
> John, do us all a favor. Take your meds and go to bed.


Sorry you got hit by that ambulance, Brian. I'm sure you'll feel
better soon. Tell us, do you _encourage_ frivolous litigation by
crackpots? I'm sure the bar association would like to know.

(For the record, Brian, I am acquainted with a number of attorneys for
whom I have personal respect, even when I don't agree with them. You
are not among them.)


  
Date: 29 Oct 2008 21:37:40
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
[email protected] wrote:
>
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> samsloan wrote:
>>>> 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
>>>> reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
>>>> already appealed. However, I feel that I must inform this court plus
>>>> opposing counsel of these new developments. In addition, I believe
>>>> that I am entitled to file this to establish a record for my appeal
>>>> which has not yet been docketed, especially since I am not allowed to
>>>> file in the Second Circuit yet.
>>>
>>> Then why are you wasting the court's time and the taxpayer's money?
>>> Doofus. The legal system is not there to serve as a playground for
>>> malignant narcissists.
>> John, do us all a favor. Take your meds and go to bed.
>
>
> Sorry you got hit by that ambulance, Brian. I'm sure you'll feel
> better soon. Tell us, do you _encourage_ frivolous litigation by
> crackpots? I'm sure the bar association would like to know.

Oh, John. You're sounding like the disgruntled old man that you are.
But, I've heard corporate executives call litigation frivolous only to
see them lose before a jury and have a judgment against them (their
company) entered by the court. One person's frivolity can be another's
serious need to redress a wrong.

>
> (For the record, Brian, I am acquainted with a number of attorneys for
> whom I have personal respect, even when I don't agree with them. You
> are not among them.)

So?


 
Date: 29 Oct 2008 06:15:45
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
On Oct 29, 8:30=A0am, Nomen Nescio <[email protected] > wrote:
> Convicted felon samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > the 28rd Day of October, 2008
> > SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
> > THIS COURTS ORDER
>
> What does "THIS COURTS ORDER" mean, asshole?
>
> > Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn
>
> By your retarded wife, asshole?
>
> > 1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of this
> > court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration of
> > the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action.
>
> hahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > my October 3 motion has never appeared on the docket sheet.
>
> Nor should it have, asshole.
>
> > Therefore, I refiled the same motion on October 7, 2008.
>
> hahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > It was denied the same day.
>
> hahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > I suspect that
>
> =A0.... Sam Sloan has been forcibly incarcerated, at the order of a judge=
,
> in a mental health detention center - true or false, asshole?
>
> > 2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9, 2008.
>
> The surest sign of an asshole is doing the same thing again and again but
> expecting a different result each time, asshole!
>
> > That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed.
>
> hahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > these things take time and that my appeal is OK.
>
> Exactly what the clerk has been told to say to fruitcakes, asshole!
>
> > 3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a new
> > development which impacts this case
>
> hahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > on October 24, 2008 Barack Obama
>
> Barack Obama has nothing to do with your k00ksuit, asshole!
>
> > 4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the
>
> =A0.... court would recognize Sam Sloan to be a fucking moron, asshole?
>
> > 5. It is to be recalled that one
>
> hahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > I think that opposing counsel here may be interested to learn that
>
> =A0.... in an earlier action involving Sam Sloan's brief career driving
> a taxi, a judge directed Sloan to send him no packages as any packages
> ostensibly emanating from Sloan would be destroyed or handed over to
> the FBI for testing, asshole!
>
> > all pertaining to the same factual situation here of Truong
>
> What does that mean, asshole?
>
> > I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have Susan
> > Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary.
>
> hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> (To be "informed" by the whackjob Lafferty is to be misinformed, asshole!=
)
>
> > 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
> > reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
> > already appealed.
>
> Having abandoned all hope, why then don't you end the pain with a bullet,
> asshole?
> Do you have any consideration for how valuable is Marcus's time, asshole?
>
> > However, I feel that I must inform this court plus opposing counsel
>
> hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > In addition, I believe that I am entitled to file this to establish a
> > record for my appeal which has not yet been docketed
>
> You are not entitled to waste any more of my taxpayers' dollars, asshole!
>
> > especially since I am not allowed to file
>
> hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the decision and
> > judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.
>
> hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> > On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel H.
> > Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who executed
> > the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrument
> > before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.
>
> > _____________________________
> > NOTARY PUBLIC
>
> What's the name of this "Not awry pubic" cunt before whom you "personally
> came", asshole?
> Is this the stupid fat ugly slit-eyed bitch you "married", asshole? The o=
ne
> who is too dumb to understand what you are doing to her 4 year old daught=
er
> to make the poor kid want to run away from you or commit suicide on the
> street, asshole?

Thank you for your incisive remarks, Mr. Truong.


  
Date: 30 Oct 2008 12:38:52
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
On Oct 30, 1:44=A0pm, "foad" <[email protected] > wrote:
> "foad" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]
>
>
>
> > "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]m..=
.
> >> On Oct 29, 8:30 am, Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Convicted felon samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > the 28rd Day of October, 2008
> >> > > SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
> >> > > THIS COURTS ORDER
>
> >> > What does "THIS COURTS ORDER" mean, asshole?
>
> >> > > Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn
>
> >> > By your retarded wife, asshole?
>
> >> > > 1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of
> >> > > this
> >> > > court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration o=
f
> >> > > the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action.
>
> >> > hahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > my October 3 motion has never appeared on the docket sheet.
>
> >> > Nor should it have, asshole.
>
> >> > > Therefore, I refiled the same motion on October 7, 2008.
>
> >> > hahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > It was denied the same day.
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > I suspect that
>
> >> > .... Sam Sloan has been forcibly incarcerated, at the order of a jud=
ge,
> >> > in a mental health detention center - true or false, asshole?
>
> >> > > 2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9,
> >> > > 2008.
>
> >> > The surest sign of an asshole is doing the same thing again and agai=
n
> >> > but
> >> > expecting a different result each time, asshole!
>
> >> > > That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed.
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > these things take time and that my appeal is OK.
>
> >> > Exactly what the clerk has been told to say to fruitcakes, asshole!
>
> >> > > 3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a
> >> > > new
> >> > > development which impacts this case
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > on October 24, 2008 Barack Obama
>
> >> > Barack Obama has nothing to do with your k00ksuit, asshole!
>
> >> > > 4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the
>
> >> > .... court would recognize Sam Sloan to be a fucking moron, asshole?
>
> >> > > 5. It is to be recalled that one
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > I think that opposing counsel here may be interested to learn that
>
> >> > .... in an earlier action involving Sam Sloan's brief career driving
> >> > a taxi, a judge directed Sloan to send him no packages as any packag=
es
> >> > ostensibly emanating from Sloan would be destroyed or handed over to
> >> > the FBI for testing, asshole!
>
> >> > > all pertaining to the same factual situation here of Truong
>
> >> > What does that mean, asshole?
>
> >> > > I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have Susan
> >> > > Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary.
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >> > (To be "informed" by the whackjob Lafferty is to be misinformed,
> >> > asshole!=3D
> >> )
>
> >> > > 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion
> >> > > for
> >> > > reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I hav=
e
> >> > > already appealed.
>
> >> > Having abandoned all hope, why then don't you end the pain with a
> >> > bullet,
> >> > asshole?
> >> > Do you have any consideration for how valuable is Marcus's time,
> >> > asshole?
>
> >> > > However, I feel that I must inform this court plus opposing counse=
l
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > In addition, I believe that I am entitled to file this to establis=
h a
> >> > > record for my appeal which has not yet been docketed
>
> >> > You are not entitled to waste any more of my taxpayers' dollars,
> >> > asshole!
>
> >> > > especially since I am not allowed to file
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the decisio=
n
> >> > > and
> >> > > judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.
>
> >> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>
> >> > > On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel =
H.
> >> > > Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who execut=
ed
> >> > > the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrumen=
t
> >> > > before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.
>
> >> > > _____________________________
> >> > > NOTARY PUBLIC
>
> >> > What's the name of this "Not awry pubic" cunt before whom you
> >> > "personally
> >> > came", asshole?
> >> > Is this the stupid fat ugly slit-eyed bitch you "married", asshole? =
The
> >> > one
> >> > who is too dumb to understand what you are doing to her 4 year old
> >> > daughter
> >> > to make the poor kid want to run away from you or commit suicide on =
the
> >> > street, asshole?
>
> >> Thank you for your incisive remarks, Mr. Truong.
>
> > Why are you talking to yourself, you goddamned asswipe? No one believes
> > the
> > remailer user or users is or are or were PT. Some or maybe all of them =
are
> > you, Sloan. You are a stupid liar. Your archived posts about how slit-e=
yed
> > women come to America so as to "fuck niggers" show what you are capable
> > of.
> > The person who should be removed from the country is you, and sent back=
to
> > Afghanistan or Pakistan where the male relatives of Honzagool will
> > castrate
> > you (slowly - they know how to make it last for weeks) and make you eat
> > your own tiny testicles and penis. You can take the senile fool in MA
> > 01106
> > with you since he has been acting as your legal eagle for more than a
> > year,
> > it is a slam dunk that the pathans will review the finer points of clie=
nt
> > attorney privilege with glee as they roast his miserable nuts. You are =
a
> > despicable malicious pair of impotent poltroons. IIRC, unless one of yo=
u
> > experiences an epiphany and thus reforms, not one single person will sh=
ed
> > a tear for you when you eventually leave this planet which you have bee=
n
> > infesting since your unfortunate births. Have I made myself clear to bo=
th
> > of you, Mr World Championship of Chinese Chess for Non-Chinese and Mr A=
LJ
> > Ambulance-Chasing Counselor Cunt?
>
> Oh dear. Now there's a fake Sam Foad. Is no one safe?
>
> Path:
> nwrddc02.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.ne=
t!news.glorb.com!news2!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2n=
ews-x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
> Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
> From: "foad" <[email protected]>
> References:
> <[email protected]m>
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
> X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.109.107.87
> Newsgroups:
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.c=
omputer,misc.legal
> X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1226334124 70.109.107.87 (Wed, 29 Oct 2008
> 09:13:07 EDT)
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:04 -0600 (MDT)
> Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
> Organization: [email protected]
> Xref: news.verizon.net rec.games.chess.politics:260412
> rec.games.chess.misc:186696 rec.games.chess.computer:76833 misc.legal:454=
072
> X-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:35:05 EDT (nwrddc02.gnilink.net)

Now that you too have been impersonated through dizum.com, the same
anonymous remailer that is used by Truong, Polgar and Alexander, do
you still think that this is such a minor, trivial matter?

Sam Sloan

Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2!
news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-
x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
From: "foad" <[email protected] >
References: <05ca9a30-336e-48b5-bcf9-
[email protected] >
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.109.107.87
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.com=
puter,misc.legal
X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1226334124 70.109.107.87 (Wed, 29 Oct
2008 09:13:07 EDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:04 -0600 (MDT)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]

"samsloan" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:05ca9a30-336e-48b5-bcf9-
[email protected]
> On Oct 29, 8:30 am, Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Convicted felon samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > the 28rd Day of October, 2008
> > > SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
> > > THIS COURTS ORDER
> >
> > What does "THIS COURTS ORDER" mean, asshole?
> >
> > > Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn
> >
> > By your retarded wife, asshole?
> >
> > > 1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of thi=
s
> > > court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration of
> > > the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action.
> >
> > hahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > my October 3 motion has never appeared on the docket sheet.
> >
> > Nor should it have, asshole.
> >
> > > Therefore, I refiled the same motion on October 7, 2008.
> >
> > hahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > It was denied the same day.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > I suspect that
> >
> > .... Sam Sloan has been forcibly incarcerated, at the order of a judge,
> > in a mental health detention center - true or false, asshole?
> >
> > > 2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9, 200=
8.
> >
> > The surest sign of an asshole is doing the same thing again and again b=
ut
> > expecting a different result each time, asshole!
> >
> > > That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > these things take time and that my appeal is OK.
> >
> > Exactly what the clerk has been told to say to fruitcakes, asshole!
> >
> > > 3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a ne=
w
> > > development which impacts this case
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > on October 24, 2008 Barack Obama
> >
> > Barack Obama has nothing to do with your k00ksuit, asshole!
> >
> > > 4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the
> >
> > .... court would recognize Sam Sloan to be a fucking moron, asshole?
> >
> > > 5. It is to be recalled that one
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > I think that opposing counsel here may be interested to learn that
> >
> > .... in an earlier action involving Sam Sloan's brief career driving
> > a taxi, a judge directed Sloan to send him no packages as any packages
> > ostensibly emanating from Sloan would be destroyed or handed over to
> > the FBI for testing, asshole!
> >
> > > all pertaining to the same factual situation here of Truong
> >
> > What does that mean, asshole?
> >
> > > I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have Susan
> > > Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> > (To be "informed" by the whackjob Lafferty is to be misinformed, asshol=
e!=3D
> )
> >
> > > 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion fo=
r
> > > reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
> > > already appealed.
> >
> > Having abandoned all hope, why then don't you end the pain with a bulle=
t,
> > asshole?
> > Do you have any consideration for how valuable is Marcus's time, asshol=
e?
> >
> > > However, I feel that I must inform this court plus opposing counsel
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > In addition, I believe that I am entitled to file this to establish a
> > > record for my appeal which has not yet been docketed
> >
> > You are not entitled to waste any more of my taxpayers' dollars, asshol=
e!
> >
> > > especially since I am not allowed to file
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the decision a=
nd
> > > judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel H.
> > > Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who executed
> > > the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrument
> > > before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.
> >
> > > _____________________________
> > > NOTARY PUBLIC
> >
> > What's the name of this "Not awry pubic" cunt before whom you "personal=
ly
> > came", asshole?
> > Is this the stupid fat ugly slit-eyed bitch you "married", asshole? The=
one
> > who is too dumb to understand what you are doing to her 4 year old daug=
hter
> > to make the poor kid want to run away from you or commit suicide on the
> > street, asshole?
>
> Thank you for your incisive remarks, Mr. Truong.


   
Date: 30 Oct 2008 20:42:19
From: The Fake Sam Foad
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong

"samsloan" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...


Now that you too have been impersonated through dizum.com, the same
anonymous remailer that is used by Truong, Polgar and Alexander, do
you still think that this is such a minor, trivial matter?
===

Yes. Also, I still think you're a chowderhead.



  
Date: 30 Oct 2008 10:35:04
From: foad
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
"samsloan" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]m...
> On Oct 29, 8:30 am, Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Convicted felon samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > the 28rd Day of October, 2008
> > > SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
> > > THIS COURTS ORDER
> >
> > What does "THIS COURTS ORDER" mean, asshole?
> >
> > > Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn
> >
> > By your retarded wife, asshole?
> >
> > > 1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of this
> > > court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration of
> > > the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action.
> >
> > hahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > my October 3 motion has never appeared on the docket sheet.
> >
> > Nor should it have, asshole.
> >
> > > Therefore, I refiled the same motion on October 7, 2008.
> >
> > hahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > It was denied the same day.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > I suspect that
> >
> > .... Sam Sloan has been forcibly incarcerated, at the order of a judge,
> > in a mental health detention center - true or false, asshole?
> >
> > > 2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9, 2008.
> >
> > The surest sign of an asshole is doing the same thing again and again but
> > expecting a different result each time, asshole!
> >
> > > That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > these things take time and that my appeal is OK.
> >
> > Exactly what the clerk has been told to say to fruitcakes, asshole!
> >
> > > 3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a new
> > > development which impacts this case
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > on October 24, 2008 Barack Obama
> >
> > Barack Obama has nothing to do with your k00ksuit, asshole!
> >
> > > 4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the
> >
> > .... court would recognize Sam Sloan to be a fucking moron, asshole?
> >
> > > 5. It is to be recalled that one
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > I think that opposing counsel here may be interested to learn that
> >
> > .... in an earlier action involving Sam Sloan's brief career driving
> > a taxi, a judge directed Sloan to send him no packages as any packages
> > ostensibly emanating from Sloan would be destroyed or handed over to
> > the FBI for testing, asshole!
> >
> > > all pertaining to the same factual situation here of Truong
> >
> > What does that mean, asshole?
> >
> > > I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have Susan
> > > Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> > (To be "informed" by the whackjob Lafferty is to be misinformed, asshole!=
> )
> >
> > > 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
> > > reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
> > > already appealed.
> >
> > Having abandoned all hope, why then don't you end the pain with a bullet,
> > asshole?
> > Do you have any consideration for how valuable is Marcus's time, asshole?
> >
> > > However, I feel that I must inform this court plus opposing counsel
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > In addition, I believe that I am entitled to file this to establish a
> > > record for my appeal which has not yet been docketed
> >
> > You are not entitled to waste any more of my taxpayers' dollars, asshole!
> >
> > > especially since I am not allowed to file
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the decision and
> > > judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
> >
> > > On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel H.
> > > Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who executed
> > > the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrument
> > > before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.
> >
> > > _____________________________
> > > NOTARY PUBLIC
> >
> > What's the name of this "Not awry pubic" cunt before whom you "personally
> > came", asshole?
> > Is this the stupid fat ugly slit-eyed bitch you "married", asshole? The one
> > who is too dumb to understand what you are doing to her 4 year old daughter
> > to make the poor kid want to run away from you or commit suicide on the
> > street, asshole?
>
> Thank you for your incisive remarks, Mr. Truong.

Why are you talking to yourself, you goddamned asswipe? No one believes the
remailer user or users is or are or were PT. Some or maybe all of them are
you, Sloan. You are a stupid liar. Your archived posts about how slit-eyed
women come to America so as to "fuck niggers" show what you are capable of.
The person who should be removed from the country is you, and sent back to
Afghanistan or Pakistan where the male relatives of Honzagool will castrate
you (slowly - they know how to make it last for weeks) and make you eat
your own tiny testicles and penis. You can take the senile fool in MA 01106
with you since he has been acting as your legal eagle for more than a year,
it is a slam dunk that the pathans will review the finer points of client
attorney privilege with glee as they roast his miserable nuts. You are a
despicable malicious pair of impotent poltroons. IIRC, unless one of you
experiences an epiphany and thus reforms, not one single person will shed
a tear for you when you eventually leave this planet which you have been
infesting since your unfortunate births. Have I made myself clear to both
of you, Mr World Championship of Chinese Chess for Non-Chinese and Mr ALJ
Ambulance-Chasing Counselor Cunt?












































































































   
Date: 30 Oct 2008 19:28:04
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
foad wrote:
> "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]m...
>> On Oct 29, 8:30 am, Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Convicted felon samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> the 28rd Day of October, 2008
>>>> SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
>>>> THIS COURTS ORDER
>>> What does "THIS COURTS ORDER" mean, asshole?
>>>
>>>> Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn
>>> By your retarded wife, asshole?
>>>
>>>> 1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of this
>>>> court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration of
>>>> the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action.
>>> hahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> my October 3 motion has never appeared on the docket sheet.
>>> Nor should it have, asshole.
>>>
>>>> Therefore, I refiled the same motion on October 7, 2008.
>>> hahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> It was denied the same day.
>>> hahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> I suspect that
>>> .... Sam Sloan has been forcibly incarcerated, at the order of a judge,
>>> in a mental health detention center - true or false, asshole?
>>>
>>>> 2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9, 2008.
>>> The surest sign of an asshole is doing the same thing again and again but
>>> expecting a different result each time, asshole!
>>>
>>>> That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed.
>>> hahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> these things take time and that my appeal is OK.
>>> Exactly what the clerk has been told to say to fruitcakes, asshole!
>>>
>>>> 3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a new
>>>> development which impacts this case
>>> hahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> on October 24, 2008 Barack Obama
>>> Barack Obama has nothing to do with your k00ksuit, asshole!
>>>
>>>> 4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the
>>> .... court would recognize Sam Sloan to be a fucking moron, asshole?
>>>
>>>> 5. It is to be recalled that one
>>> hahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> I think that opposing counsel here may be interested to learn that
>>> .... in an earlier action involving Sam Sloan's brief career driving
>>> a taxi, a judge directed Sloan to send him no packages as any packages
>>> ostensibly emanating from Sloan would be destroyed or handed over to
>>> the FBI for testing, asshole!
>>>
>>>> all pertaining to the same factual situation here of Truong
>>> What does that mean, asshole?
>>>
>>>> I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have Susan
>>>> Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary.
>>> hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>> (To be "informed" by the whackjob Lafferty is to be misinformed, asshole!=
>> )
>>>> 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
>>>> reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
>>>> already appealed.
>>> Having abandoned all hope, why then don't you end the pain with a bullet,
>>> asshole?
>>> Do you have any consideration for how valuable is Marcus's time, asshole?
>>>
>>>> However, I feel that I must inform this court plus opposing counsel
>>> hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> In addition, I believe that I am entitled to file this to establish a
>>>> record for my appeal which has not yet been docketed
>>> You are not entitled to waste any more of my taxpayers' dollars, asshole!
>>>
>>>> especially since I am not allowed to file
>>> hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the decision and
>>>> judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.
>>> hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>>>
>>>> On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel H.
>>>> Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who executed
>>>> the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrument
>>>> before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.
>>>> _____________________________
>>>> NOTARY PUBLIC
>>> What's the name of this "Not awry pubic" cunt before whom you "personally
>>> came", asshole?
>>> Is this the stupid fat ugly slit-eyed bitch you "married", asshole? The one
>>> who is too dumb to understand what you are doing to her 4 year old daughter
>>> to make the poor kid want to run away from you or commit suicide on the
>>> street, asshole?
>> Thank you for your incisive remarks, Mr. Truong.
>
> Why are you talking to yourself, you goddamned asswipe? No one believes the
> remailer user or users is or are or were PT. Some or maybe all of them are
> you, Sloan. You are a stupid liar. Your archived posts about how slit-eyed
> women come to America so as to "fuck niggers" show what you are capable of.
> The person who should be removed from the country is you, and sent back to
> Afghanistan or Pakistan where the male relatives of Honzagool will castrate
> you (slowly - they know how to make it last for weeks) and make you eat
> your own tiny testicles and penis. You can take the senile fool in MA 01106
> with you since he has been acting as your legal eagle for more than a year,
> it is a slam dunk that the pathans will review the finer points of client
> attorney privilege with glee as they roast his miserable nuts. You are a
> despicable malicious pair of impotent poltroons. IIRC, unless one of you
> experiences an epiphany and thus reforms, not one single person will shed
> a tear for you when you eventually leave this planet which you have been
> infesting since your unfortunate births. Have I made myself clear to both
> of you, Mr World Championship of Chinese Chess for Non-Chinese and Mr ALJ
> Ambulance-Chasing Counselor Cunt?

Archived


   
Date: 30 Oct 2008 17:44:46
From: foad
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong



"foad" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]m...
>> On Oct 29, 8:30 am, Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Convicted felon samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > the 28rd Day of October, 2008
>> > > SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
>> > > THIS COURTS ORDER
>> >
>> > What does "THIS COURTS ORDER" mean, asshole?
>> >
>> > > Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn
>> >
>> > By your retarded wife, asshole?
>> >
>> > > 1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of
>> > > this
>> > > court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration of
>> > > the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action.
>> >
>> > hahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > my October 3 motion has never appeared on the docket sheet.
>> >
>> > Nor should it have, asshole.
>> >
>> > > Therefore, I refiled the same motion on October 7, 2008.
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > It was denied the same day.
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > I suspect that
>> >
>> > .... Sam Sloan has been forcibly incarcerated, at the order of a judge,
>> > in a mental health detention center - true or false, asshole?
>> >
>> > > 2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9,
>> > > 2008.
>> >
>> > The surest sign of an asshole is doing the same thing again and again
>> > but
>> > expecting a different result each time, asshole!
>> >
>> > > That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed.
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > these things take time and that my appeal is OK.
>> >
>> > Exactly what the clerk has been told to say to fruitcakes, asshole!
>> >
>> > > 3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a
>> > > new
>> > > development which impacts this case
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > on October 24, 2008 Barack Obama
>> >
>> > Barack Obama has nothing to do with your k00ksuit, asshole!
>> >
>> > > 4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the
>> >
>> > .... court would recognize Sam Sloan to be a fucking moron, asshole?
>> >
>> > > 5. It is to be recalled that one
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > I think that opposing counsel here may be interested to learn that
>> >
>> > .... in an earlier action involving Sam Sloan's brief career driving
>> > a taxi, a judge directed Sloan to send him no packages as any packages
>> > ostensibly emanating from Sloan would be destroyed or handed over to
>> > the FBI for testing, asshole!
>> >
>> > > all pertaining to the same factual situation here of Truong
>> >
>> > What does that mean, asshole?
>> >
>> > > I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have Susan
>> > > Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary.
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> > (To be "informed" by the whackjob Lafferty is to be misinformed,
>> > asshole!=
>> )
>> >
>> > > 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion
>> > > for
>> > > reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
>> > > already appealed.
>> >
>> > Having abandoned all hope, why then don't you end the pain with a
>> > bullet,
>> > asshole?
>> > Do you have any consideration for how valuable is Marcus's time,
>> > asshole?
>> >
>> > > However, I feel that I must inform this court plus opposing counsel
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > In addition, I believe that I am entitled to file this to establish a
>> > > record for my appeal which has not yet been docketed
>> >
>> > You are not entitled to waste any more of my taxpayers' dollars,
>> > asshole!
>> >
>> > > especially since I am not allowed to file
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the decision
>> > > and
>> > > judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.
>> >
>> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
>> >
>> > > On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel H.
>> > > Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who executed
>> > > the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrument
>> > > before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.
>> >
>> > > _____________________________
>> > > NOTARY PUBLIC
>> >
>> > What's the name of this "Not awry pubic" cunt before whom you
>> > "personally
>> > came", asshole?
>> > Is this the stupid fat ugly slit-eyed bitch you "married", asshole? The
>> > one
>> > who is too dumb to understand what you are doing to her 4 year old
>> > daughter
>> > to make the poor kid want to run away from you or commit suicide on the
>> > street, asshole?
>>
>> Thank you for your incisive remarks, Mr. Truong.
>
> Why are you talking to yourself, you goddamned asswipe? No one believes
> the
> remailer user or users is or are or were PT. Some or maybe all of them are
> you, Sloan. You are a stupid liar. Your archived posts about how slit-eyed
> women come to America so as to "fuck niggers" show what you are capable
> of.
> The person who should be removed from the country is you, and sent back to
> Afghanistan or Pakistan where the male relatives of Honzagool will
> castrate
> you (slowly - they know how to make it last for weeks) and make you eat
> your own tiny testicles and penis. You can take the senile fool in MA
> 01106
> with you since he has been acting as your legal eagle for more than a
> year,
> it is a slam dunk that the pathans will review the finer points of client
> attorney privilege with glee as they roast his miserable nuts. You are a
> despicable malicious pair of impotent poltroons. IIRC, unless one of you
> experiences an epiphany and thus reforms, not one single person will shed
> a tear for you when you eventually leave this planet which you have been
> infesting since your unfortunate births. Have I made myself clear to both
> of you, Mr World Championship of Chinese Chess for Non-Chinese and Mr ALJ
> Ambulance-Chasing Counselor Cunt?

Oh dear. Now there's a fake Sam Foad. Is no one safe?



Path:
nwrddc02.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!news.glorb.com!news2!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
From: "foad" <[email protected] >
References:
<[email protected]m >
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.109.107.87
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.computer,misc.legal
X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1226334124 70.109.107.87 (Wed, 29 Oct 2008
09:13:07 EDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:04 -0600 (MDT)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
Xref: news.verizon.net rec.games.chess.politics:260412
rec.games.chess.misc:186696 rec.games.chess.computer:76833 misc.legal:454072
X-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:35:05 EDT (nwrddc02.gnilink.net)









 
Date: 29 Oct 2008 13:30:01
From: Nomen Nescio
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
Convicted felon samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:

> the 28rd Day of October, 2008
> SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
> THIS COURTS ORDER

What does "THIS COURTS ORDER" mean, asshole?

> Samuel H. Sloan, being duly sworn

By your retarded wife, asshole?

> 1. On October 3, 2008, I filed a motion for re-reconsideration of this
> court's order dated October 1, 2008 which denied reconsideration of
> the judgment dated August 29, 2008 dismissing this action.

hahahahahahaha, asshole!

> my October 3 motion has never appeared on the docket sheet.

Nor should it have, asshole.

> Therefore, I refiled the same motion on October 7, 2008.

hahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> It was denied the same day.

hahahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> I suspect that

.... Sam Sloan has been forcibly incarcerated, at the order of a judge,
in a mental health detention center - true or false, asshole?

> 2. I filed a notice of appeal with the pro se clerk on October 9, 2008.

The surest sign of an asshole is doing the same thing again and again but
expecting a different result each time, asshole!

> That Notice of Appeal still has not been docketed.

hahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> these things take time and that my appeal is OK.

Exactly what the clerk has been told to say to fruitcakes, asshole!

> 3. However, now I must inform this court and opposing counsel of a new
> development which impacts this case

hahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> on October 24, 2008 Barack Obama

Barack Obama has nothing to do with your k00ksuit, asshole!

> 4. I predicted in the early stages of the case here that the

.... court would recognize Sam Sloan to be a fucking moron, asshole?

> 5. It is to be recalled that one

hahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> I think that opposing counsel here may be interested to learn that

.... in an earlier action involving Sam Sloan's brief career driving
a taxi, a judge directed Sloan to send him no packages as any packages
ostensibly emanating from Sloan would be destroyed or handed over to
the FBI for testing, asshole!

> all pertaining to the same factual situation here of Truong

What does that mean, asshole?

> I also am informed that efforts are now being made to have Susan
> Polgar criminally prosecuted and deported back to Hungary.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!
(To be "informed" by the whackjob Lafferty is to be misinformed, asshole!)

> 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
> reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
> already appealed.

Having abandoned all hope, why then don't you end the pain with a bullet,
asshole?
Do you have any consideration for how valuable is Marcus's time, asshole?

> However, I feel that I must inform this court plus opposing counsel

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> In addition, I believe that I am entitled to file this to establish a
> record for my appeal which has not yet been docketed

You are not entitled to waste any more of my taxpayers' dollars, asshole!

> especially since I am not allowed to file

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> my motion for re-reconsideration should be granted and the decision and
> judgment of this court should be vacated and set aside.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, asshole!

> On the 28rd Day of October, 2008 before me personally came Samuel H.
> Sloan to me known to be the person described herein and who executed
> the foregoing instrument. Such person duly swore to such instrument
> before me and duly acknowledged that he executed the same.
>
> _____________________________
> NOTARY PUBLIC

What's the name of this "Not awry pubic" cunt before whom you "personally
came", asshole?
Is this the stupid fat ugly slit-eyed bitch you "married", asshole? The one
who is too dumb to understand what you are doing to her 4 year old daughter
to make the poor kid want to run away from you or commit suicide on the
street, asshole?



 
Date: 28 Oct 2008 17:49:27
From:
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong


samsloan wrote:
> 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
> reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
> already appealed. However, I feel that I must inform this court plus
> opposing counsel of these new developments. In addition, I believe
> that I am entitled to file this to establish a record for my appeal
> which has not yet been docketed, especially since I am not allowed to
> file in the Second Circuit yet.


Then why are you wasting the court's time and the taxpayer's money?
Doofus. The legal system is not there to serve as a playground for
malignant narcissists.


  
Date: 29 Oct 2008 02:44:22
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: SDNY: Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. Truong
[email protected] wrote:
>
> samsloan wrote:
>> 10. I have abandoned all hope that this court will grant my motion for
>> reconsideration which has already been denied and from which I have
>> already appealed. However, I feel that I must inform this court plus
>> opposing counsel of these new developments. In addition, I believe
>> that I am entitled to file this to establish a record for my appeal
>> which has not yet been docketed, especially since I am not allowed to
>> file in the Second Circuit yet.
>
>
> Then why are you wasting the court's time and the taxpayer's money?
> Doofus. The legal system is not there to serve as a playground for
> malignant narcissists.
John, do us all a favor. Take your meds and go to bed.