Main
Date: 15 Dec 2007 18:52:26
From: Non scrivetemi
Subject: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
Who then, pray, is [email protected]? Enquiring minds need to know by Jan. 2.
This genuis started posting in October or maybe the last days of September
-
so only after Trollgar was blown. Since I am a passerby and not E, one
might think jkh001 must be Jim. But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX
(Plano/
Dallas). jkh knows all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis personae,
giving the St Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper report
(available if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that suggests PT
is the victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not honorary,
but
with honor). The obvious suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is
elegant
enough - could not know all of these. So I do not know who jkh is, honest.
But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the acerbic Rev.
Lecter
Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser. It may just be
possible he was the funnier SlamStoan (successor to obese Tom.) Maybe Liam
The First (very much alive), before ork.net closed down the forged address.
Identify (via the real AC) jkh001, I think lots of mysteries will be
solved,
phone (615) 736 5151 if you think you know who jkh001 is. Before the (fake)
Rev. Walkers come up with more worthless speculation, it is obvious jkh001
is not PT. With all respect, PT is incapable of writing as jkh001 writes.
Yes, jkh001 is using redirects (SOCKS4 proxies) and is not in Texas at all.
Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when what he
posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The answer is
obvious.
- Winston Smith (Non scrivetemi)

Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" <[email protected] > wrote in
<[email protected] >...

> Got the who, the where, the what, the why, and the when.
>
> You can blame ONE individual for this ENTIRE mess, and it's NOT the "Fake
> Same Sloan." Many are guilty, but it all falls from one domino.
>
> If this ONE individual were removed from chess, or even suspended for three
> years, about 99 percent of the problems we now face would be solved. Most
> of what we see here is a case of basically decent people doing really bad
> things out of really bad judgement, egged on by one case of PURE EVIL that
> is sending them over the edge.
>
> The snake will live unless its head is chopped off (figuratively). Samuel
> H. Sloan appears to be playing into the hands of the snake, whether or not
> he realizes it.
>
> What the snake never realized is that activists and whistleblowers are just
> like them: if you remove one of us, a stronger one will take its place.
> Samuel H. Sloan is not getting the job done, as his pending legal disaster
> indicates, which is why I still have my eye on this. If I don't get the job
> done, someone with more time and money than me will. It's really just a
> matter of time at this point, and a question of fallout.
>
> We have the smoking gun, but we do not know what started the process that
> led to it being fired. The imposter is a decoy, a pawn, designed to deflect
> a much larger evil.
>
> If the ringleader vacates chess before I finish and get to court, I might
> pull back, but indications are that this snake is all-in. If the snake does
> resign, I recommend moving forward, as a return show of good faith.
>
> The snake should make no mistake: mate is on the board. Mine, at least.





 
Date: 22 Dec 2007 03:16:46
From: accounts receivable
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
Non scrivetemi wrote:

> Who then, pray, is [email protected]? Enquiring minds need to know by Jan. 2.

DUH: http://www.chessjournalism.org/director.htm#Editor



 
Date: 15 Dec 2007 23:36:24
From:
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?


[email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 15, 6:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> > For what it's worth, a) I don't use any anonymizing software (looked
> > into it once but it wasn't worth he trouble), and b) Doing a trace on
> > an AOL/AIM account is a complete waste of time (all it tells you is
> > which proxy AOL is using at the moment). If this is the level of
> > computer expertise being applied to the Mottershead business, I don't
> > think Truong has much to worry about. (Parenthesis for donkeys: This
> > is not a comment on Truong's guilt or lack thereof. It is a reference
> > to the level of intelligence displayed by the originator of this
> > thread.)
>
> So, you set up Paul Truong yourself, or at least helped Paul type
> All of those messages. 2,500 messages it too much for a set up,
> But more likely, a conspiracy of more than one person.
>
> A virus, or a worm, would need to be quite large to contain all of
> those messages.
> If Paul were set up, MacAfee and Norton would know about the VIRUS
> today,
> And be able to tell us about it.
>
> So, if I am a suspect, then show me the MacAfee patch that fixes my
> "virus plant"
>
> The Russians in FIDE aren't even capable of what I have been accused
> of...
>
> cus Roberts
> Computer Scientist


What are you howling about, cus? Even by your standards, the above
makes no sense.


 
Date: 15 Dec 2007 22:24:57
From:
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
On Dec 15, 6:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> For what it's worth, a) I don't use any anonymizing software (looked
> into it once but it wasn't worth he trouble), and b) Doing a trace on
> an AOL/AIM account is a complete waste of time (all it tells you is
> which proxy AOL is using at the moment). If this is the level of
> computer expertise being applied to the Mottershead business, I don't
> think Truong has much to worry about. (Parenthesis for donkeys: This
> is not a comment on Truong's guilt or lack thereof. It is a reference
> to the level of intelligence displayed by the originator of this
> thread.)

So, you set up Paul Truong yourself, or at least helped Paul type
All of those messages. 2,500 messages it too much for a set up,
But more likely, a conspiracy of more than one person.

A virus, or a worm, would need to be quite large to contain all of
those messages.
If Paul were set up, MacAfee and Norton would know about the VIRUS
today,
And be able to tell us about it.

So, if I am a suspect, then show me the MacAfee patch that fixes my
"virus plant"

The Russians in FIDE aren't even capable of what I have been accused
of...

cus Roberts
Computer Scientist


 
Date: 15 Dec 2007 16:33:20
From:
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?

For what it's worth, a) I don't use any anonymizing software (looked
into it once but it wasn't worth he trouble), and b) Doing a trace on
an AOL/AIM account is a complete waste of time (all it tells you is
which proxy AOL is using at the moment). If this is the level of
computer expertise being applied to the Mottershead business, I don't
think Truong has much to worry about. (Parenthesis for donkeys: This
is not a comment on Truong's guilt or lack thereof. It is a reference
to the level of intelligence displayed by the originator of this
thread.)


  
Date: 16 Dec 2007 11:27:05
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!
feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-
x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <[email protected] >.
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
CC: [email protected]
References: <bdd6ec28-0019-49be-b329-
[email protected] >
From: Paul <[email protected] >
X-No-Archive: yes
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
Complaints-To: [email protected]
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 11975438944 24010 127.0.0.1 (16 Dec 2007
00:33:44 GMT)
Injection-Info: s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=67.167.189.8; posting-account=Ec-a-woAAAD4yxI_fj2N_YHOcxgJ5zGx
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:
1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.8,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID:
<[email protected] >
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:23:38 +0000 (GMT)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit - Mail2News

On Dec 16, 11:23 am, Paul <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 15, 04:33 pm, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If this is the level of computer expertise being applied to the
> > Mottershead business, I don't think Truong has much to worry about.
>
> It is. So he doesn't. :-)))
>
> They even think Denny Chin is a lady. This is the honorable judge who
> is the internet expert of the southern district. He is a free speech
> advocate. He would not want to shut down Mr. Sloan but equally he will
> not shut down someone exposing Mr. Sloan. Just see his decision in Fox
> News v. Al Franken, Chin is a megastar and goes straight to the point.
> Personally, I believe Chin will be motivated to find a way around the
> jurisdictional issues just so he can dismiss the suit on substantive
> grounds (making it tough for Mr. Sloan to refile in Illinois etc.).
> There is not a shadow of a doubt that Judge Chin has already read some
> of the letters sent to him giving him the websites, not least in which
> arehttp://www.samsloan.comhttp://www.ishipress.comhttp://www.anusha
> .comhttp://www.shamema.comhttp://www.ishius.comand the changes made
> that are documented athttp://www.archive.org. Already Judge Chin may
> have come to his own conclusion about the character and strategies of
> Mr. Sloan. Maybe he even found some racist crap about Japanese girls
> preferring to f**k "nigg*rs" and derogatory demeaning insult referrals
> to slit-eyeds, not written by FSS. Given the level of PC expertise of
> Mr. Mootershead, it is not established Mr. Truong is involved in any
> FSS post. If for purely hypothetical study we temporarily accept, Mr.
> Truong was responsible for sending some of the FSS messages, Judge
> Denny may conclude the longterm-calculated conduct of Mr. Sloan has
> provoked law-abiding mannerly citizens to acts of righteous outrage.
> Mr. Sloan has deliberately tricked them so he can later sue them ?
> So in that sense the FSS is yet another of Mr. Sloan's bastards that
> was given life by the action of Mr. Sloan (but paid for via welfare
> checks by the rest of us taxpaying slobs.) One way or other, it is
> Mr. Sloan who made FSS. Let him also pay for FSS. I am 100% confident
> Judge Denny Chin will not be intimidated by Mr. Sloan's veiled threat
> to conduct a dirty campaign against Judge Chin on the sloan-websites
> just like Mr. Sloan has done against some other judges who dismissed
> his frivolous lawsuits before, kept his children safe (that means,
> very faraway from him) and so fully upheld the spirits of the law. I
> know Judge Denny Chin will definitely show courage against Mr. Sloan.

I am again replying just to preserve the headers.


  
Date: 16 Dec 2007 08:58:29
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
"PAUL" ACCOUNT BANNED

The Historian wrote: "This is almost as bad as the FSS."

Quite so. Looks like another infestation of anons.

Profile

This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups
Terms Of Use.

Enter an email address to look up the profile for an author:


The Historian wrote:
> This is almost as bad as the FSS. Almost every day there's another
> anonymous poster using remailer software defending Truong. Here's the
> latest, with full header information:
>
> Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!
> feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-
> x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
> Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
> above.
> It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
> Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
> remailer administrator at <[email protected]>.
> Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
> CC: [email protected]
> References: <bdd6ec28-0019-49be-b329-
> [email protected]>
> From: Paul <[email protected]>
> X-No-Archive: yes
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> Complaints-To: [email protected]
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 11975438944 24010 127.0.0.1 (16 Dec 2007
> 00:33:44 GMT)
> Injection-Info: s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-
> host=67.167.189.8; posting-account=Ec-a-woAAAD4yxI_fj2N_YHOcxgJ5zGx
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:
> 1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.8,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:23:38 +0000 (GMT)
> X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
> Organization: Bananasplit - Mail2News
>
> On Dec 15, 04:33 pm, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If this is the level of computer expertise being applied to the
> > Mottershead business, I don't think Truong has much to worry about.
>
> It is. So he doesn't. :-)))
>
> They even think Denny Chin is a lady. This is the honorable judge who
> is the internet expert of the southern district. He is a free speech
> advocate. He would not want to shut down Mr. Sloan but equally he will
> not shut down someone exposing Mr. Sloan. Just see his decision in Fox
> News v. Al Franken, Chin is a megastar and goes straight to the point.
> Personally, I believe Chin will be motivated to find a way around the
> jurisdictional issues just so he can dismiss the suit on substantive
> grounds (making it tough for Mr. Sloan to refile in Illinois etc.).
> There is not a shadow of a doubt that Judge Chin has already read some
> of the letters sent to him giving him the websites, not least in which
> are http://www.samsloan.com http://www.ishipress.com http://www.anusha
> .com http://www.shamema.com http://www.ishius.com and the changes made
> that are documented at http://www.archive.org. Already Judge Chin may
> have come to his own conclusion about the character and strategies of
> Mr. Sloan. Maybe he even found some racist crap about Japanese girls
> preferring to f**k "nigg*rs" and derogatory demeaning insult referrals
> to slit-eyeds, not written by FSS. Given the level of PC expertise of
> Mr. Mootershead, it is not established Mr. Truong is involved in any
> FSS post. If for purely hypothetical study we temporarily accept, Mr.
> Truong was responsible for sending some of the FSS messages, Judge
> Denny may conclude the longterm-calculated conduct of Mr. Sloan has
> provoked law-abiding mannerly citizens to acts of righteous outrage.
> Mr. Sloan has deliberately tricked them so he can later sue them ?
> So in that sense the FSS is yet another of Mr. Sloan's bastards that
> was given life by the action of Mr. Sloan (but paid for via welfare
> checks by the rest of us taxpaying slobs.) One way or other, it is
> Mr. Sloan who made FSS. Let him also pay for FSS. I am 100% confident
> Judge Denny Chin will not be intimidated by Mr. Sloan's veiled threat
> to conduct a dirty campaign against Judge Chin on the sloan-websites
> just like Mr. Sloan has done against some other judges who dismissed
> his frivolous lawsuits before, kept his children safe (that means,
> very faraway from him) and so fully upheld the spirits of the law. I
> know Judge Denny Chin will definitely show courage against Mr. Sloan.
>
> On Dec 16, 11:23 am, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 04:33 pm, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > If this is the level of computer expertise being applied to the
> > > Mottershead business, I don't think Truong has much to worry about.
> >
> > It is. So he doesn't. :-)))
> >
> > They even think Denny Chin is a lady. This is the honorable judge who
> > is the internet expert of the southern district. He is a free speech
> > advocate. He would not want to shut down Mr. Sloan but equally he will
> > not shut down someone exposing Mr. Sloan. Just see his decision in Fox
> > News v. Al Franken, Chin is a megastar and goes straight to the point.
> > Personally, I believe Chin will be motivated to find a way around the
> > jurisdictional issues just so he can dismiss the suit on substantive
> > grounds (making it tough for Mr. Sloan to refile in Illinois etc.).
> > There is not a shadow of a doubt that Judge Chin has already read some
> > of the letters sent to him giving him the websites, not least in which
> > arehttp://www.samsloan.comhttp://www.ishipress.comhttp://www.anusha
> > .comhttp://www.shamema.comhttp://www.ishius.comand the changes made
> > that are documented athttp://www.archive.org. Already Judge Chin may
> > have come to his own conclusion about the character and strategies of
> > Mr. Sloan. Maybe he even found some racist crap about Japanese girls
> > preferring to f**k "nigg*rs" and derogatory demeaning insult referrals
> > to slit-eyeds, not written by FSS. Given the level of PC expertise of
> > Mr. Mootershead, it is not established Mr. Truong is involved in any
> > FSS post. If for purely hypothetical study we temporarily accept, Mr.
> > Truong was responsible for sending some of the FSS messages, Judge
> > Denny may conclude the longterm-calculated conduct of Mr. Sloan has
> > provoked law-abiding mannerly citizens to acts of righteous outrage.
> > Mr. Sloan has deliberately tricked them so he can later sue them ?
> > So in that sense the FSS is yet another of Mr. Sloan's bastards that
> > was given life by the action of Mr. Sloan (but paid for via welfare
> > checks by the rest of us taxpaying slobs.) One way or other, it is
> > Mr. Sloan who made FSS. Let him also pay for FSS. I am 100% confident
> > Judge Denny Chin will not be intimidated by Mr. Sloan's veiled threat
> > to conduct a dirty campaign against Judge Chin on the sloan-websites
> > just like Mr. Sloan has done against some other judges who dismissed
> > his frivolous lawsuits before, kept his children safe (that means,
> > very faraway from him) and so fully upheld the spirits of the law. I
> > know Judge Denny Chin will definitely show courage against Mr. Sloan.


  
Date: 16 Dec 2007 08:30:37
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
This is almost as bad as the FSS. Almost every day there's another
anonymous poster using remailer software defending Truong. Here's the
latest, with full header information:

Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!
feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-
x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <[email protected] >.
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
CC: [email protected]
References: <bdd6ec28-0019-49be-b329-
[email protected] >
From: Paul <[email protected] >
X-No-Archive: yes
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
Complaints-To: [email protected]
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 11975438944 24010 127.0.0.1 (16 Dec 2007
00:33:44 GMT)
Injection-Info: s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=67.167.189.8; posting-account=Ec-a-woAAAD4yxI_fj2N_YHOcxgJ5zGx
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:
1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.8,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID:
<[email protected] >
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:23:38 +0000 (GMT)
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit - Mail2News

On Dec 15, 04:33 pm, [email protected] <[email protected] > wrote:
> If this is the level of computer expertise being applied to the
> Mottershead business, I don't think Truong has much to worry about.

It is. So he doesn't. :-)))

They even think Denny Chin is a lady. This is the honorable judge who
is the internet expert of the southern district. He is a free speech
advocate. He would not want to shut down Mr. Sloan but equally he will
not shut down someone exposing Mr. Sloan. Just see his decision in Fox
News v. Al Franken, Chin is a megastar and goes straight to the point.
Personally, I believe Chin will be motivated to find a way around the
jurisdictional issues just so he can dismiss the suit on substantive
grounds (making it tough for Mr. Sloan to refile in Illinois etc.).
There is not a shadow of a doubt that Judge Chin has already read some
of the letters sent to him giving him the websites, not least in which
are http://www.samsloan.com http://www.ishipress.com http://www.anusha
.com http://www.shamema.com http://www.ishius.com and the changes made
that are documented at http://www.archive.org. Already Judge Chin may
have come to his own conclusion about the character and strategies of
Mr. Sloan. Maybe he even found some racist crap about Japanese girls
preferring to f**k "nigg*rs" and derogatory demeaning insult referrals
to slit-eyeds, not written by FSS. Given the level of PC expertise of
Mr. Mootershead, it is not established Mr. Truong is involved in any
FSS post. If for purely hypothetical study we temporarily accept, Mr.
Truong was responsible for sending some of the FSS messages, Judge
Denny may conclude the longterm-calculated conduct of Mr. Sloan has
provoked law-abiding mannerly citizens to acts of righteous outrage.
Mr. Sloan has deliberately tricked them so he can later sue them ?
So in that sense the FSS is yet another of Mr. Sloan's bastards that
was given life by the action of Mr. Sloan (but paid for via welfare
checks by the rest of us taxpaying slobs.) One way or other, it is
Mr. Sloan who made FSS. Let him also pay for FSS. I am 100% confident
Judge Denny Chin will not be intimidated by Mr. Sloan's veiled threat
to conduct a dirty campaign against Judge Chin on the sloan-websites
just like Mr. Sloan has done against some other judges who dismissed
his frivolous lawsuits before, kept his children safe (that means,
very faraway from him) and so fully upheld the spirits of the law. I
know Judge Denny Chin will definitely show courage against Mr. Sloan.

On Dec 16, 11:23 am, Paul <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 15, 04:33 pm, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If this is the level of computer expertise being applied to the
> > Mottershead business, I don't think Truong has much to worry about.
>
> It is. So he doesn't. :-)))
>
> They even think Denny Chin is a lady. This is the honorable judge who
> is the internet expert of the southern district. He is a free speech
> advocate. He would not want to shut down Mr. Sloan but equally he will
> not shut down someone exposing Mr. Sloan. Just see his decision in Fox
> News v. Al Franken, Chin is a megastar and goes straight to the point.
> Personally, I believe Chin will be motivated to find a way around the
> jurisdictional issues just so he can dismiss the suit on substantive
> grounds (making it tough for Mr. Sloan to refile in Illinois etc.).
> There is not a shadow of a doubt that Judge Chin has already read some
> of the letters sent to him giving him the websites, not least in which
> arehttp://www.samsloan.comhttp://www.ishipress.comhttp://www.anusha
> .comhttp://www.shamema.comhttp://www.ishius.comand the changes made
> that are documented athttp://www.archive.org. Already Judge Chin may
> have come to his own conclusion about the character and strategies of
> Mr. Sloan. Maybe he even found some racist crap about Japanese girls
> preferring to f**k "nigg*rs" and derogatory demeaning insult referrals
> to slit-eyeds, not written by FSS. Given the level of PC expertise of
> Mr. Mootershead, it is not established Mr. Truong is involved in any
> FSS post. If for purely hypothetical study we temporarily accept, Mr.
> Truong was responsible for sending some of the FSS messages, Judge
> Denny may conclude the longterm-calculated conduct of Mr. Sloan has
> provoked law-abiding mannerly citizens to acts of righteous outrage.
> Mr. Sloan has deliberately tricked them so he can later sue them ?
> So in that sense the FSS is yet another of Mr. Sloan's bastards that
> was given life by the action of Mr. Sloan (but paid for via welfare
> checks by the rest of us taxpaying slobs.) One way or other, it is
> Mr. Sloan who made FSS. Let him also pay for FSS. I am 100% confident
> Judge Denny Chin will not be intimidated by Mr. Sloan's veiled threat
> to conduct a dirty campaign against Judge Chin on the sloan-websites
> just like Mr. Sloan has done against some other judges who dismissed
> his frivolous lawsuits before, kept his children safe (that means,
> very faraway from him) and so fully upheld the spirits of the law. I
> know Judge Denny Chin will definitely show courage against Mr. Sloan.



  
Date: 16 Dec 2007 16:23:38
From: Paul
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
On Dec 15, 04:33 pm, [email protected] <[email protected] > wrote:
> If this is the level of computer expertise being applied to the
> Mottershead business, I don't think Truong has much to worry about.

It is. So he doesn't. :-)))

They even think Denny Chin is a lady. This is the honorable judge who
is the internet expert of the southern district. He is a free speech
advocate. He would not want to shut down Mr. Sloan but equally he will
not shut down someone exposing Mr. Sloan. Just see his decision in Fox
News v. Al Franken, Chin is a megastar and goes straight to the point.
Personally, I believe Chin will be motivated to find a way around the
jurisdictional issues just so he can dismiss the suit on substantive
grounds (making it tough for Mr. Sloan to refile in Illinois etc.).
There is not a shadow of a doubt that Judge Chin has already read some
of the letters sent to him giving him the websites, not least in which
are http://www.samsloan.com http://www.ishipress.com http://www.anusha
.com http://www.shamema.com http://www.ishius.com and the changes made
that are documented at http://www.archive.org. Already Judge Chin may
have come to his own conclusion about the character and strategies of
Mr. Sloan. Maybe he even found some racist crap about Japanese girls
preferring to f**k "nigg*rs" and derogatory demeaning insult referrals
to slit-eyeds, not written by FSS. Given the level of PC expertise of
Mr. Mootershead, it is not established Mr. Truong is involved in any
FSS post. If for purely hypothetical study we temporarily accept, Mr.
Truong was responsible for sending some of the FSS messages, Judge
Denny may conclude the longterm-calculated conduct of Mr. Sloan has
provoked law-abiding mannerly citizens to acts of righteous outrage.
Mr. Sloan has deliberately tricked them so he can later sue them ?
So in that sense the FSS is yet another of Mr. Sloan's bastards that
was given life by the action of Mr. Sloan (but paid for via welfare
checks by the rest of us taxpaying slobs.) One way or other, it is
Mr. Sloan who made FSS. Let him also pay for FSS. I am 100% confident
Judge Denny Chin will not be intimidated by Mr. Sloan's veiled threat
to conduct a dirty campaign against Judge Chin on the sloan-websites
just like Mr. Sloan has done against some other judges who dismissed
his frivolous lawsuits before, kept his children safe (that means,
very faraway from him) and so fully upheld the spirits of the law. I
know Judge Denny Chin will definitely show courage against Mr. Sloan.



 
Date: 15 Dec 2007 13:42:21
From:
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?


[email protected] wrote:
> FROM ONE ANON TO ANOTHER
>
> <But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX (Plano/ Dallas). jkh knows
> all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis personae, giving the St
> Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper report
> (available
> if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that suggests PT is
> the
> victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not honorary, but
> with honor). The obvious suspect in TX -- the only one whose prose is
> elegant enough -- could not know all of these. So I do not know who
> jkh is,
> honest. But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the
> acerbic Rev.
> Lecter Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser.>
> -- Non scivetmi
>
> It's always fun to watch one anon try to figure out who another anon
> is.
>
> JKH is clearly an informed insider. Plano, Texas, you say? That's the
> stomping ground of former USCF president Tim Redman whose prose is
> indeed elegant..
>
> Non scrivetemi wrote:
> > Who then, pray, is [email protected]? Enquiring minds need to know by Jan. 2.
> > This genuis started posting in October or maybe the last days of September
> > -
> > so only after Trollgar was blown. Since I am a passerby and not E, one
> > might think jkh001 must be Jim. But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX
> > (Plano/
> > Dallas). jkh knows all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis personae,
> > giving the St Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper report
> > (available if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that suggests PT
> > is the victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not honorary,
> > but
> > with honor). The obvious suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is
> > elegant
> > enough - could not know all of these. So I do not know who jkh is, honest.
> > But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the acerbic Rev.
> > Lecter
> > Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser. It may just be
> > possible he was the funnier SlamStoan (successor to obese Tom.) Maybe Liam
> > The First (very much alive), before ork.net closed down the forged address.
> > Identify (via the real AC) jkh001, I think lots of mysteries will be
> > solved,
> > phone (615) 736 5151 if you think you know who jkh001 is. Before the (fake)
> > Rev. Walkers come up with more worthless speculation, it is obvious jkh001
> > is not PT. With all respect, PT is incapable of writing as jkh001 writes.
> > Yes, jkh001 is using redirects (SOCKS4 proxies) and is not in Texas at all.
> > Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when what he
> > posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The answer is
> > obvious.
> > - Winston Smith (Non scrivetemi)
> >
> > Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > <[email protected]>...
> >
> > > Got the who, the where, the what, the why, and the when.
> > >
> > > You can blame ONE individual for this ENTIRE mess, and it's NOT the "Fake
> > > Same Sloan." Many are guilty, but it all falls from one domino.
> > >
> > > If this ONE individual were removed from chess, or even suspended for three
> > > years, about 99 percent of the problems we now face would be solved. Most
> > > of what we see here is a case of basically decent people doing really bad
> > > things out of really bad judgement, egged on by one case of PURE EVIL that
> > > is sending them over the edge.
> > >
> > > The snake will live unless its head is chopped off (figuratively). Samuel
> > > H. Sloan appears to be playing into the hands of the snake, whether or not
> > > he realizes it.
> > >
> > > What the snake never realized is that activists and whistleblowers are just
> > > like them: if you remove one of us, a stronger one will take its place.
> > > Samuel H. Sloan is not getting the job done, as his pending legal disaster
> > > indicates, which is why I still have my eye on this. If I don't get the job
> > > done, someone with more time and money than me will. It's really just a
> > > matter of time at this point, and a question of fallout.
> > >
> > > We have the smoking gun, but we do not know what started the process that
> > > led to it being fired. The imposter is a decoy, a pawn, designed to deflect
> > > a much larger evil.
> > >
> > > If the ringleader vacates chess before I finish and get to court, I might
> > > pull back, but indications are that this snake is all-in. If the snake does
> > > resign, I recommend moving forward, as a return show of good faith.
> > >
> > > The snake should make no mistake: mate is on the board. Mine, at least.But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX
> (Plano/
> Dallas). jkh knows all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis
> personae,
> giving the St Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper
> report
> (available if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that
> suggests PT
> is the victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not
> honorary,
> but
> with honor). The obvious suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is
> elegant
> enough - could not know all of these. So I do not know who jkh is,
> honest.
> But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the acerbic Rev.
> Lecter
> Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser.


Heh. I'm sure Tim will be amused.


 
Date: 15 Dec 2007 13:23:32
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
FROM ONE ANON TO ANOTHER

<But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX (Plano/ Dallas). jkh knows
all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis personae, giving the St
Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper report
(available
if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that suggests PT is
the
victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not honorary, but
with honor). The obvious suspect in TX -- the only one whose prose is
elegant enough -- could not know all of these. So I do not know who
jkh is,
honest. But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the
acerbic Rev.
Lecter Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser. >
-- Non scivetmi

It's always fun to watch one anon try to figure out who another anon
is.

JKH is clearly an informed insider. Plano, Texas, you say? That's the
stomping ground of former USCF president Tim Redman whose prose is
indeed elegant..

Non scrivetemi wrote:
> Who then, pray, is [email protected]? Enquiring minds need to know by Jan. 2.
> This genuis started posting in October or maybe the last days of September
> -
> so only after Trollgar was blown. Since I am a passerby and not E, one
> might think jkh001 must be Jim. But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX
> (Plano/
> Dallas). jkh knows all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis personae,
> giving the St Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper report
> (available if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that suggests PT
> is the victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not honorary,
> but
> with honor). The obvious suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is
> elegant
> enough - could not know all of these. So I do not know who jkh is, honest.
> But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the acerbic Rev.
> Lecter
> Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser. It may just be
> possible he was the funnier SlamStoan (successor to obese Tom.) Maybe Liam
> The First (very much alive), before ork.net closed down the forged address.
> Identify (via the real AC) jkh001, I think lots of mysteries will be
> solved,
> phone (615) 736 5151 if you think you know who jkh001 is. Before the (fake)
> Rev. Walkers come up with more worthless speculation, it is obvious jkh001
> is not PT. With all respect, PT is incapable of writing as jkh001 writes.
> Yes, jkh001 is using redirects (SOCKS4 proxies) and is not in Texas at all.
> Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when what he
> posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The answer is
> obvious.
> - Winston Smith (Non scrivetemi)
>
> Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>...
>
> > Got the who, the where, the what, the why, and the when.
> >
> > You can blame ONE individual for this ENTIRE mess, and it's NOT the "Fake
> > Same Sloan." Many are guilty, but it all falls from one domino.
> >
> > If this ONE individual were removed from chess, or even suspended for three
> > years, about 99 percent of the problems we now face would be solved. Most
> > of what we see here is a case of basically decent people doing really bad
> > things out of really bad judgement, egged on by one case of PURE EVIL that
> > is sending them over the edge.
> >
> > The snake will live unless its head is chopped off (figuratively). Samuel
> > H. Sloan appears to be playing into the hands of the snake, whether or not
> > he realizes it.
> >
> > What the snake never realized is that activists and whistleblowers are just
> > like them: if you remove one of us, a stronger one will take its place.
> > Samuel H. Sloan is not getting the job done, as his pending legal disaster
> > indicates, which is why I still have my eye on this. If I don't get the job
> > done, someone with more time and money than me will. It's really just a
> > matter of time at this point, and a question of fallout.
> >
> > We have the smoking gun, but we do not know what started the process that
> > led to it being fired. The imposter is a decoy, a pawn, designed to deflect
> > a much larger evil.
> >
> > If the ringleader vacates chess before I finish and get to court, I might
> > pull back, but indications are that this snake is all-in. If the snake does
> > resign, I recommend moving forward, as a return show of good faith.
> >
> > The snake should make no mistake: mate is on the board. Mine, at least.But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX
(Plano/
Dallas). jkh knows all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis
personae,
giving the St Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper
report
(available if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that
suggests PT
is the victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not
honorary,
but
with honor). The obvious suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is
elegant
enough - could not know all of these. So I do not know who jkh is,
honest.
But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the acerbic Rev.
Lecter
Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser.


  
Date: 16 Dec 2007 14:21:59
From:
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?


Non scrivetemi wrote:
> [email protected] wrote in
> <d5a475dc-73d2-4e0d-859b-6fd4305c5938@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>...
> >
> > FROM ONE ANON TO ANOTHER
> > It's always fun to watch one anon try to figure out who another anon
> > is.
>
> What if they are one and the same anon, Mr Parr? In this case they are
> not, as I sure am one of them and I am sure not jkh001 a/k/a RFSS.
>
> > JKH is clearly an informed insider. Plano, Texas, you say? That's the
> > stomping ground of former USCF president Tim ----- whose prose is
> > indeed elegant..
>
> Of course Tim was the obvious suspect, why else did I write "The obvious
> suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is elegant enough - could not
> know" (about the C\\\\r report)? Trust you to lack subtlety, Mr Parr.
> These are a few of jkh001's IPs from recent rgcp posts, go see-
> 65.91.246.*
> 68.122.165.*
> 76.232.53.*
> 76.208.152.*
> 76.208.140.*
> and all WHOIS to Plano or close to it. But they change by large values
> in just a few hours. Even a reassigning dynamic dial-up would not do
> that. Too many to be an office-home scenario. And two were open, because
> I managed to post via them within 10 minutes of jkh001 posting. Which
> is why I know for sure that SOCKS4 is being used, and thus probably but
> not definitely (double-bluff?) by someone not near Plano.
> It is not all that easy to use SOCKS4 proxies. To find 6+ of them in
> one geographical area may be downright hard. Someone very capable is
> therefore trying to make it look as if jkh001, and therefore Qusz, is
> TR. This someone apparently woke up and created the jkh001 identity
> only 2 days after the mass deletions started. Coincidence? Nah, no way.
> Check back at the IPs of Qusz and you will see the connection.. There
> is even more to it. I discovered via one of Mr Sloan's recent filings
> the intriguing-
> > Time of posting: 12/10/2007 20:54 -0800
> > IP: **.208.145.**
> > For a search fee of USD 200 you can learn the first and last
> > octets of the originating IP. It is not a known proxy address
> > and is likely to be the real IP of the sender.
> > Email using your ISP's email address to [email protected]
> > cc: [email protected] for a Paypal address to progress
> > this. If you are the sender and wish to remain anonymous,
> > the payment will guarantee your anonymity is preserved. Do
> > not contact the administrator at dizum.com, that is the exit
> > remailer and has no access to the originating IP data.
>
> When I check 76.208.145.99 (I made up the "99" and guessed the "76",
> easy guess given the tracks) it also resolves to Plano! So "Nomen
> Nescio" may have used one of the webposting sites to put at least
> one anonymous message into rgcp.
>
> jkh001 came up with a weak explanation about AOL/AIM proxies. This
> is bullshit. The IP showing is a local Plano one with SW Bell. It has
> nothing to do with random selecting by AOL. So why is jkh001 lying?
> What else is jkh001 lying about? Enquiring minds would like to know.
> MW and GRP probably have scores to settle with you.
>
> >> Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when
> >> what he posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The
> >> answer is obvious
> and it is that jkh001.aim.com has more than most to hide. The real Q is
> why is jkh001 a/k/a Qusz a/k/a who-knows-who-else pretending to be Tim?
> Or is it Tim, having found an early slip-up, covering his tracks by now
> pretending to be the victim of a smear? I have copied this to apas as I
> am out of my depth.
>
> By the by, RufusZ=Rob. Ever pleased to help the incomparable Mr Sloan.
> - Winston Smith (Non scrivetemi, USCF 12xx)


Simple answer: You're a moron. Neither I nor my ISP is in Texas.
Closest I've ever been is driving across the panhandle in 1978. I
don't particularly care whether my identity is known or not, but a day
in which I can frustrate a cretin like you is a day well spent.

Here's a question for you: Do you have a life?


   
Date: 17 Dec 2007 02:47:23
From:
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
On Dec 16, 6:24 pm, Paul <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 16, 02:21 pm, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Non scrivetemi wrote:
>
> Howling snipped.
> apas trimmed, there are enough anons already.
>
> > Simple answer: You're a moron.
>
> My sentiment exactly. Thank you.
>
> > Neither I nor my ISP is in Texas.
> > Closest I've ever been is driving across the panhandle in 1978. I
> > don't particularly care whether my identity is known or not, but a day
> > in which I can frustrate a cretin like you is a day well spent.
>
> Tell me why a day spent frustrating Mr. Roberts would be well spent?
> But seriously Mr. JKH what do you think Judge Chin plans? Could he be
> influenced by a latent threat of being punished forever on Mr. Sloan's
> really fine websites? While I cannot know or guess if Mr. Truong is
> guilty (but seems unlikely he could be so obvious), given your equally
> obvious legal-eagle status, what do you think Mr. Sloan might expect if
> -gasp- he were to prevail against P / T? Against BB? Others, irrelevant.
> More probable, have not Mr. Lafferty and Mr. Roberts overstepped the
> k in what they have put forth? Call me biased, but I never read any
> thing written by FSS more offensive than what Mr. Roberts has uttered
> about a lady. Mr. Sloan, whatever be his merits, is no lady.

Replying to peserve.

It's Paul talking to himself...

Call me biased, but I never read any

> thing written by FSS more offensive than what Mr. Roberts has uttered
> about a lady.

We on St Kitts and Nevis (for which I do NOT sit in her Parliment with
her goverment or on her opposition benches)
were pretty offended when Paul Truong threatened to kill Prime Minster
Douglas. What did I write? I offended a lady?
This is the same man talking to himself...

cus Roberts
Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE


   
Date: 17 Dec 2007 00:24:46
From: Paul
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
On Dec 16, 02:21 pm, [email protected] <[email protected] > wrote:
>Non scrivetemi wrote:

Howling snipped.
apas trimmed, there are enough anons already.

> Simple answer: You're a moron.

My sentiment exactly. Thank you.

> Neither I nor my ISP is in Texas.
> Closest I've ever been is driving across the panhandle in 1978. I
> don't particularly care whether my identity is known or not, but a day
> in which I can frustrate a cretin like you is a day well spent.

Tell me why a day spent frustrating Mr. Roberts would be well spent?
But seriously Mr. JKH what do you think Judge Chin plans? Could he be
influenced by a latent threat of being punished forever on Mr. Sloan's
really fine websites? While I cannot know or guess if Mr. Truong is
guilty (but seems unlikely he could be so obvious), given your equally
obvious legal-eagle status, what do you think Mr. Sloan might expect if
-gasp- he were to prevail against P / T? Against BB? Others, irrelevant.
More probable, have not Mr. Lafferty and Mr. Roberts overstepped the
k in what they have put forth? Call me biased, but I never read any
thing written by FSS more offensive than what Mr. Roberts has uttered
about a lady. Mr. Sloan, whatever be his merits, is no lady.



  
Date: 16 Dec 2007 19:06:09
From: Non scrivetemi
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
[email protected] wrote in
<d5a475dc-73d2-4e0d-859b-6fd4305c5938@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com >...
>
> FROM ONE ANON TO ANOTHER
> It's always fun to watch one anon try to figure out who another anon
> is.

What if they are one and the same anon, Mr Parr? In this case they are
not, as I sure am one of them and I am sure not jkh001 a/k/a RFSS.

> JKH is clearly an informed insider. Plano, Texas, you say? That's the
> stomping ground of former USCF president Tim ----- whose prose is
> indeed elegant..

Of course Tim was the obvious suspect, why else did I write "The obvious
suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is elegant enough - could not
know" (about the C\\\\r report)? Trust you to lack subtlety, Mr Parr.
These are a few of jkh001's IPs from recent rgcp posts, go see-
65.91.246.*
68.122.165.*
76.232.53.*
76.208.152.*
76.208.140.*
and all WHOIS to Plano or close to it. But they change by large values
in just a few hours. Even a reassigning dynamic dial-up would not do
that. Too many to be an office-home scenario. And two were open, because
I managed to post via them within 10 minutes of jkh001 posting. Which
is why I know for sure that SOCKS4 is being used, and thus probably but
not definitely (double-bluff?) by someone not near Plano.
It is not all that easy to use SOCKS4 proxies. To find 6+ of them in
one geographical area may be downright hard. Someone very capable is
therefore trying to make it look as if jkh001, and therefore Qusz, is
TR. This someone apparently woke up and created the jkh001 identity
only 2 days after the mass deletions started. Coincidence? Nah, no way.
Check back at the IPs of Qusz and you will see the connection.. There
is even more to it. I discovered via one of Mr Sloan's recent filings
the intriguing-
> Time of posting: 12/10/2007 20:54 -0800
> IP: **.208.145.**
> For a search fee of USD 200 you can learn the first and last
> octets of the originating IP. It is not a known proxy address
> and is likely to be the real IP of the sender.
> Email using your ISP's email address to [email protected]
> cc: [email protected] for a Paypal address to progress
> this. If you are the sender and wish to remain anonymous,
> the payment will guarantee your anonymity is preserved. Do
> not contact the administrator at dizum.com, that is the exit
> remailer and has no access to the originating IP data.

When I check 76.208.145.99 (I made up the "99" and guessed the "76",
easy guess given the tracks) it also resolves to Plano! So "Nomen
Nescio" may have used one of the webposting sites to put at least
one anonymous message into rgcp.

jkh001 came up with a weak explanation about AOL/AIM proxies. This
is bullshit. The IP showing is a local Plano one with SW Bell. It has
nothing to do with random selecting by AOL. So why is jkh001 lying?
What else is jkh001 lying about? Enquiring minds would like to know.
MW and GRP probably have scores to settle with you.

>> Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when
>> what he posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The
>> answer is obvious
and it is that jkh001.aim.com has more than most to hide. The real Q is
why is jkh001 a/k/a Qusz a/k/a who-knows-who-else pretending to be Tim?
Or is it Tim, having found an early slip-up, covering his tracks by now
pretending to be the victim of a smear? I have copied this to apas as I
am out of my depth.

By the by, RufusZ=Rob. Ever pleased to help the incomparable Mr Sloan.
- Winston Smith (Non scrivetemi, USCF 12xx)



   
Date: 16 Dec 2007 19:05:05
From: Solo
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
In article <[email protected] >
"Non scrivetemi" <[email protected] > wrote:
>
> [email protected] wrote in
> <d5a475dc-73d2-4e0d-859b-6fd4305c5938@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>...
> >
> > FROM ONE ANON TO ANOTHER
> > It's always fun to watch one anon try to figure out who another anon
> > is.
>
> What if they are one and the same anon, Mr Parr? In this case they are
> not, as I sure am one of them and I am sure not jkh001 a/k/a RFSS.
>
> > JKH is clearly an informed insider. Plano, Texas, you say? That's the
> > stomping ground of former USCF president Tim ----- whose prose is
> > indeed elegant..
>
> Of course Tim was the obvious suspect, why else did I write "The obvious
> suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is elegant enough - could not
> know" (about the C\\\\r report)? Trust you to lack subtlety, Mr Parr.
> These are a few of jkh001's IPs from recent rgcp posts, go see-
> 65.91.246.*
> 68.122.165.*
> 76.232.53.*
> 76.208.152.*
> 76.208.140.*
> and all WHOIS to Plano or close to it. But they change by large values
> in just a few hours. Even a reassigning dynamic dial-up would not do
> that. Too many to be an office-home scenario. And two were open, because
> I managed to post via them within 10 minutes of jkh001 posting. Which
> is why I know for sure that SOCKS4 is being used, and thus probably but
> not definitely (double-bluff?) by someone not near Plano.
> It is not all that easy to use SOCKS4 proxies. To find 6+ of them in
> one geographical area may be downright hard. Someone very capable is
> therefore trying to make it look as if jkh001, and therefore Qusz, is
> TR. This someone apparently woke up and created the jkh001 identity
> only 2 days after the mass deletions started. Coincidence? Nah, no way.
> Check back at the IPs of Qusz and you will see the connection.. There
> is even more to it. I discovered via one of Mr Sloan's recent filings
> the intriguing-
> > Time of posting: 12/10/2007 20:54 -0800
> > IP: **.208.145.**
> > For a search fee of USD 200 you can learn the first and last
> > octets of the originating IP. It is not a known proxy address
> > and is likely to be the real IP of the sender.
> > Email using your ISP's email address to [email protected]
> > cc: [email protected] for a Paypal address to progress
> > this. If you are the sender and wish to remain anonymous,
> > the payment will guarantee your anonymity is preserved. Do
> > not contact the administrator at dizum.com, that is the exit
> > remailer and has no access to the originating IP data.
>
> When I check 76.208.145.99 (I made up the "99" and guessed the "76",
> easy guess given the tracks) it also resolves to Plano! So "Nomen
> Nescio" may have used one of the webposting sites to put at least
> one anonymous message into rgcp.
>
> jkh001 came up with a weak explanation about AOL/AIM proxies. This
> is bullshit. The IP showing is a local Plano one with SW Bell. It has
> nothing to do with random selecting by AOL. So why is jkh001 lying?
> What else is jkh001 lying about? Enquiring minds would like to know.
> MW and GRP probably have scores to settle with you.
>
> >> Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when
> >> what he posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The
> >> answer is obvious
> and it is that jkh001.aim.com has more than most to hide. The real Q is
> why is jkh001 a/k/a Qusz a/k/a who-knows-who-else pretending to be Tim?
> Or is it Tim, having found an early slip-up, covering his tracks by now
> pretending to be the victim of a smear? I have copied this to apas as I
> am out of my depth.
>
> By the by, RufusZ=Rob. Ever pleased to help the incomparable Mr Sloan.
> - Winston Smith (Non scrivetemi, USCF 12xx)

Who gives a shit?!






































































 
Date: 15 Dec 2007 10:51:32
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
From: "Non scrivetemi" <[email protected] >
Message: This is a Type II anonymous message, sent to you by the
Winston Smith
Project Pboxmix mixmaster server at pboxmix.winstonsmith.info.
If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact
[email protected].
Subject: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
Cc: [email protected]
X-No-Archive: yes
Author-Address-Header: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[email protected] >
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:52:26 +0100 (CET)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!
feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!
news.bananasplit.info!mail2news.mixmin.net
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]

On Dec 15, 12:52 pm, "Non scrivetemi"
<[email protected] > wrote:
> Who then, pray, is [email protected]? Enquiring minds need to know by Jan. 2.
> This genuis started posting in October or maybe the last days of September
> -
> so only after Trollgar was blown. Since I am a passerby and not E, one
> might think jkh001 must be Jim. But the IPs resolve to SW Bell hubs in TX
> (Plano/
> Dallas). jkh knows all there is to know about law, USCF dramatis personae,
> giving the St Kitts Delegate the bird, even the undistributed Cowper report
> (available if incredibly the suit progresses to discovery) that suggests PT
> is the victim of a conspiracy including a computer expert (not honorary,
> but
> with honor). The obvious suspect in TX - the only one whose prose is
> elegant
> enough - could not know all of these. So I do not know who jkh is, honest.
> But I do know that jkh's recent slip revealed he was the acerbic Rev.
> Lecter
> Calvin Abu Hyndoo Qusz, Jr. and therefore the mad Perfesser. It may just be
> possible he was the funnier SlamStoan (successor to obese Tom.) Maybe Liam
> The First (very much alive), before ork.net closed down the forged address.
> Identify (via the real AC) jkh001, I think lots of mysteries will be
> solved,
> phone (615) 736 5151 if you think you know who jkh001 is. Before the (fake)
> Rev. Walkers come up with more worthless speculation, it is obvious jkh001
> is not PT. With all respect, PT is incapable of writing as jkh001 writes.
> Yes, jkh001 is using redirects (SOCKS4 proxies) and is not in Texas at all.
> Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when what he
> posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The answer is
> obvious.
> - Winston Smith (Non scrivetemi)
>
> Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>...
>
> > Got the who, the where, the what, the why, and the when.
>
> > You can blame ONE individual for this ENTIRE mess, and it's NOT the "Fake
> > Same Sloan." Many are guilty, but it all falls from one domino.
>
> > If this ONE individual were removed from chess, or even suspended for three
> > years, about 99 percent of the problems we now face would be solved. Most
> > of what we see here is a case of basically decent people doing really bad
> > things out of really bad judgement, egged on by one case of PURE EVIL that
> > is sending them over the edge.
>
> > The snake will live unless its head is chopped off (figuratively). Samuel
> > H. Sloan appears to be playing into the hands of the snake, whether or not
> > he realizes it.
>
> > What the snake never realized is that activists and whistleblowers are just
> > like them: if you remove one of us, a stronger one will take its place.
> > Samuel H. Sloan is not getting the job done, as his pending legal disaster
> > indicates, which is why I still have my eye on this. If I don't get the job
> > done, someone with more time and money than me will. It's really just a
> > matter of time at this point, and a question of fallout.
>
> > We have the smoking gun, but we do not know what started the process that
> > led to it being fired. The imposter is a decoy, a pawn, designed to deflect
> > a much larger evil.
>
> > If the ringleader vacates chess before I finish and get to court, I might
> > pull back, but indications are that this snake is all-in. If the snake does
> > resign, I recommend moving forward, as a return show of good faith.
>
> > The snake should make no mistake: mate is on the board. Mine, at least.

Again replying to preserve this.

Sam Sloan


 
Date: 15 Dec 2007 10:28:57
From: J.D. Walker
Subject: Re: So who the Sam Hill is [email protected]?
Non scrivetemi wrote:

> phone (615) 736 5151 if you think you know who jkh001 is. Before the (fake)
> Rev. Walkers come up with more worthless speculation, it is obvious jkh001
> is not PT. With all respect, PT is incapable of writing as jkh001 writes.
> Yes, jkh001 is using redirects (SOCKS4 proxies) and is not in Texas at all.
> Why would jkh take such extreme measures to hide his identity, when what he
> posts is rediculously polite and does not justify it? The answer is
> obvious.

I have no idea who jkh001 is,, and I do not believe I have ever
speculated on his/her identity. If you are actually going to do
something to aid the cause of justice, more power to you. However,
judging from the quality of the presentation in your message, I have a
few doubts about your chances of success.
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.

"By the way, where is the Promised Analysis of the Mottershead
Report?"