|
Main
Date: 30 Sep 2007 05:29:03
From: samsloan
Subject: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
* Subject: Re: Proposed AUG & Forum structure * From: Paultruong@xxxxxxx * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:43:05 EDT * Delivered-to: USCF BINFO System Before we vote on this matter, I ask the board to first review a very serious matter regarding the USCF forums. Without consulting the board, programmer(s) of the USCF forums decided to enable a feature to publicly display the IPs of all members of the USCF forums. Once again, our right to privacy has been compromised. This will put all of our members at risk because of hackers. This will also create serious potential problems for the USCF. This is not the first time programmer(s) of the USCF forums have made important decisions that can negatively effect the entire federation without consulting the board. I strongly believe that this matter has to be resolved before other issues of the forum can proceed. I cannot vote on this matter until this problem is fixed. Best regards, PT
|
|
|
Date: 02 Oct 2007 04:07:59
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
On Oct 1, 7:58 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote: > <[email protected]> wrote in message > > news:[email protected]... > > > > > On Oct 1, 5:06 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jerry, it would really help if you would post this on the USCF Issues > > >> Forum. > > >> Thanks. > > >>> <[email protected]> > >>> ... > >>> Since I have not seen it stated explicitly before, > >>> I call on Paul Truong to resign. > >>> ... > > >>> Jerry Spinrad > > > Perhaps he already has. > > > Such a post would be quickly removed lest anyone second the motion. > > > Ken Sloan has mentioned the conspicuous absence of posts, and clearly > > this is due to censorship. > > > The moderators continue to obstruct any information relating to > > charges against Paul Truong. > > > Oddly enough, the topic of ijuana use is permitted. > > Surely this is an illegal activity and way off topic. > > Bashing Brian M. seems to still be permitted. Jerry's post may have been > pulled. We'll have to see if the courts can recover the lost ones. :-) Is Brian M. aware of Truong's career as "Bob Bennett?" There's a 2003 post with some pretty damning evidence.
|
|
Date: 01 Oct 2007 20:48:50
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
Question: In some earlier postings to this forum, Sam Sloan seemed to have narrowed it down to /either/ Paul Truong /or/ Susan Polgar, who appear to move as one. Now it seems the verdict has come in that it /must have been/ Paul Truong, and not Susan Polgar or any combination of the two. What happened to determine this? What did I miss that convincingly eliminated any possibility of SP's involvement? Was Mr. Sloan mistaken before, or are people just assuming what they want to assume? -- help bot
|
|
Date: 01 Oct 2007 19:46:41
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
I have not posted to the USCF forums, because I do not yet have that privilege. I registered for the forums today so I could follow and participate in any discussion, or object to the lack of discussion. My activation email has not yet been received. Jerry Spinrad On Oct 1, 7:50 pm, [email protected] wrote: > On Oct 1, 5:06 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Jerry, it would really help if you would post this on the USCF Issues > Forum. > > > Thanks. > > >> <[email protected]> > >> ... > >> Since I have not seen it stated explicitly before, > >> I call on Paul Truong to resign. > >> ... > > >> JerrySpinrad > > Perhaps he already has. > > Such a post would be quickly removed lest anyone second the motion. > > Ken Sloan has mentioned the conspicuous absence of posts, and clearly > this is due to censorship. > > The moderators continue to obstruct any information relating to > charges against Paul Truong. > > Oddly enough, the topic of ijuana use is permitted. > Surely this is an illegal activity and way off topic.
|
|
Date: 02 Oct 2007 01:49:05
From: Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
On Sep 30, 5:29 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > * Subject: Re: Proposed AUG & Forum structure > * From: Paultruong@xxxxxxx > * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:43:05 EDT > * Delivered-to: USCF BINFO System > > Before we vote on this matter, I ask the board to first > review a very serious matter regarding the USCF forums. > Without consulting the board, programmer(s) of the USCF > forums decided to enable a feature to publicly display > the IPs of all members of the USCF forums. > > Once again, our right to privacy has been compromised. I hope that Paul Truong will learn the meaning of words: honesty, responsibility, being adult behind the bars. He is a slow learner hence I hope that he will get enough time, the more the better, to learn these phrases well. Wlod
|
|
Date: 01 Oct 2007 17:50:34
From:
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
On Oct 1, 5:06 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote: > Jerry, it would really help if you would post this on the USCF Issues > Forum. > > Thanks. > >> <[email protected]> >> ... >> Since I have not seen it stated explicitly before, >> I call on Paul Truong to resign. >> ... >> >> Jerry Spinrad Perhaps he already has. Such a post would be quickly removed lest anyone second the motion. Ken Sloan has mentioned the conspicuous absence of posts, and clearly this is due to censorship. The moderators continue to obstruct any information relating to charges against Paul Truong. Oddly enough, the topic of ijuana use is permitted. Surely this is an illegal activity and way off topic.
|
| |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 00:58:58
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
<[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On Oct 1, 5:06 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Jerry, it would really help if you would post this on the USCF Issues > >> Forum. >> >> Thanks. >> >>> <[email protected]> >>> ... >>> Since I have not seen it stated explicitly before, >>> I call on Paul Truong to resign. >>> ... >>> >>> Jerry Spinrad > > Perhaps he already has. > > Such a post would be quickly removed lest anyone second the motion. > > Ken Sloan has mentioned the conspicuous absence of posts, and clearly > this is due to censorship. > > The moderators continue to obstruct any information relating to > charges against Paul Truong. > > Oddly enough, the topic of ijuana use is permitted. > Surely this is an illegal activity and way off topic. > Bashing Brian M. seems to still be permitted. Jerry's post may have been pulled. We'll have to see if the courts can recover the lost ones. :-)
|
|
Date: 01 Oct 2007 12:57:04
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
On Sep 30, 7:29 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > * Subject: Re: Proposed AUG & Forum structure > * From: Paultruong@xxxxxxx > * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:43:05 EDT > * Delivered-to: USCF BINFO System > > Before we vote on this matter, I ask the board to first review a very > serious matter regarding the USCF forums. Without consulting the > board, programmer(s) of the USCF forums decided to enable a feature to > publicly display the IPs of all members of the USCF forums. > Since I have not seen it stated explicitly before, I call on Paul Truong to resign. This is one of those perfect cases of hypocrisy. Truong's ticket campaigned on (among other issues) the need for a more civil discussion of chess politics, and as leaders who would be shining examples in the community. Truong is not denying the truth of the accusations (which seems hard to do), but arguing technicalities. His behavior was extraordinarily uncivil and embarrassing. If Truong feels that there is a right to anonymity, he is free to make this protest and then resign. I have yet to see even any apology for his actions. I hope that his allies convince him quietly to step down; there is no way that this issue can be spun so that he will not be seen as a divisive and petty board member. Jerry Spinrad > Once again, our right to privacy has been compromised. This will put > all of our members at risk because of hackers. This will also create > serious potential problems for the USCF. This is not the first time > programmer(s) of the USCF forums have made important decisions that > can negatively effect the entire federation without consulting the > board. > > I strongly believe that this matter has to be resolved before other > issues of the forum can proceed. I cannot vote on this matter until > this problem is fixed. > > Best regards, > PT
|
| |
Date: 01 Oct 2007 21:06:18
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
Jerry, it would really help if you would post this on the USCF Issues Forum. Thanks. <[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On Sep 30, 7:29 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote: >> * Subject: Re: Proposed AUG & Forum structure >> * From: Paultruong@xxxxxxx >> * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:43:05 EDT >> * Delivered-to: USCF BINFO System >> >> Before we vote on this matter, I ask the board to first review a very >> serious matter regarding the USCF forums. Without consulting the >> board, programmer(s) of the USCF forums decided to enable a feature to >> publicly display the IPs of all members of the USCF forums. >> > Since I have not seen it stated explicitly before, I call on Paul > Truong to resign. This is one of those perfect cases of hypocrisy. > Truong's ticket campaigned on (among other issues) the need for a more > civil discussion of chess politics, and as leaders who would be > shining examples in the community. Truong is not denying the truth of > the accusations (which seems hard to do), but arguing technicalities. > His behavior was extraordinarily uncivil and embarrassing. > > If Truong feels that there is a right to anonymity, he is free to make > this protest and then resign. I have yet to see even any apology for > his actions. I hope that his allies convince him quietly to step down; > there is no way that this issue can be spun so that he will not be > seen as a divisive and petty board member. > > Jerry Spinrad > >> Once again, our right to privacy has been compromised. This will put >> all of our members at risk because of hackers. This will also create >> serious potential problems for the USCF. This is not the first time >> programmer(s) of the USCF forums have made important decisions that >> can negatively effect the entire federation without consulting the >> board. >> >> I strongly believe that this matter has to be resolved before other >> issues of the forum can proceed. I cannot vote on this matter until >> this problem is fixed. >> >> Best regards, >> PT > >
|
|
Date: 30 Sep 2007 09:36:59
From: ww
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
Would you nerds stop posting your reks in scv?
|
|
Date: 30 Sep 2007 07:25:09
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Truong complains about the "hacker" who proved that he is The Fake Sam Sloan
|
by mcurtis on Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:50 am #71855 A bank robber complains that CCTV violates his right to privacy. Also the exploding dye packs endangered his life. Someone else must have registered that gun in my name, after all my name and address are a mater of public record. Someone else must have transferred my fingerprints to that gun.
|
|